Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,773 results for legtitle:"Scotland Bill 2015-16"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
CHAP 11 2016; 2016 c. 11

Returned from the Commons with the amendments agreed to.

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
769 c2518
House
House of Lords
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
769 c2520
House
House of Lords

Queen's recommendation signified. Money resolution. Ways and means resolution. Programme motion (no. 3) on proceedings on consideration of Lords amendments and subsequent stages. Agreed to on question. Lords amendments considered. The Deputy Speaker announced that Lords amendment 22 engaged Commons financial privilege. Lords amendment 1, discussed with Lords amendments 2...

Lead member
David Mundell
Department
Scotland Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 cc1683-1695
House
House of Commons
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 c1714
House
House of Commons

Hear, hear!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 c1684
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 c1683
House
House of Commons

This is a truly significant day for Scotland. If this Bill completes its parliamentary progress, it will add to the already extensive responsibilities of the Scottish Parliament a range of important new powers. It provides even greater opportunities for the Scottish Government to tailor and deliver Scottish solutions to Scottish...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 c1683
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Secretary of State for giving way. When this important work was being done, there were obvious and big

consequences for England. Which Minister or Ministers spoke for England during the negotiations?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 c1683
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend has asked that question before. This legislation has been debated on the Floor of this House and on the Floor of the other place. Extensive scrutiny of the Bill has taken place. Indeed, there has been the opportunity to scrutinise the fiscal framework as well, so...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 c1684
House
House of Commons

Going back to the previous intervention, it was obvious from the voices on the Scottish National party Benches that all the other Ministers, especially those from the Treasury, spoke for interests other than those of Scotland. Is it not time to move away from this form of devolution, whereby we...

Member
Angus Brendan MacNeil (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 c1684
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman’s colleagues may agree with him, but I do not think that the people of Scotland do. The people of Scotland made it very clear in September 2014 that they wanted to remain part of our United Kingdom, but they wanted a Scottish Parliament with enhanced powers, which...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 cc1684-6
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State’s description of the road traffic changes had me mesmerised. I could have listened to him all evening. We thank him for that.

It is a great pleasure to speak on behalf of the official Opposition. I am not going to pretend that the passage of the Bill...

Member
Ian Murray (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 cc1686-1690
House
House of Commons

I am delighted to follow the hon. Member for Edinburgh South (Ian Murray). It is a calumny that he has been described as negative. He spent much of his time at the Dispatch Box trying to be positive about the Scotland Bill. Parts of his speech were positive and we...

Member
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 cc1690-3
House
House of Commons

I will not detain the House for long, but I want to respond briefly to some of the points that have been made.

I add my best wishes to all Members of the Scottish Parliament who are leaving at this election, particularly my colleagues and others who were elected to the...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 cc1693-4
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Under section 5 of the European Communities (Amendment) Act 1993—the Maastricht Act of Parliament —there is a requirement on the Government:

“Before submitting the information required in implementing Article 103(3) of the Treaty…to report to Parliament for its approval an assessment of the medium...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 c1694
House
House of Commons

As the Minister knows, that provision concerns convergence criteria, and stability and growth factors. The trouble is that the document we have been given, entitled, “2014-15 Convergence Programme for the United Kingdom: submitted in line with the Stability and Growth pact”, contains in pages 141 to 145 a detailed assessment...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 c1694
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 c1695
House
House of Commons

Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker. I just wanted to mention the ministerial code. After all, it is incumbent on Ministers to give accurate information to Parliament, and I wish to register that point.

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 c1695
House
House of Commons

Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker. I wonder whether it would be sufficient for Ministers to report orally to the House on how they propose to amend the figures, which are clearly wrong.

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 c1695
House
House of Commons