Skip to main content

1-20 of 109 results for legtitle:"Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2012"

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That the draft regulations and orders laid before the House on 19 and 30 January be approved. Relevant documents: 39th and 40th Reports from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, considered in Grand Committee on 27 February. Motion agreed.

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 February 2012
Reference
735 c1303
House
House of Lords

Draft Jobseeker's Allowance (Domestic Violence) (Amendment) Regulations 2012. Draft Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2012. Draft Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2012. Draft Pensions Act 2008 (Abolition of Protected Rights) (Consequential Amendments) (No. 2) (Amendment) Order 2012. Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question (formal).

Lead member
Lord Freud
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
29 February 2012
Reference
735 c1303
House
House of Lords

Draft Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2012. Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Debated with draft Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2012, and draft Pensions Act 2008 (Abolition of Protected Rights) (Consequential Amendments) (No. 2) (Amendment) Order 2012. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.

Lead member
Lord Freud
Answering member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c82-97GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will focus on the Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order, particularly its implications for people of working age. As someone who is always quick to criticise the Government when I think they are doing the wrong thing, it is only proper to acknowledge and applaud the Government when...

Member
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c88-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was talking about child benefit, which was an issue raised by the noble Baroness, Lady Lister. She referred to the relationship between child benefit and tax thresholds. As you move towards the universal credit system, that is the way you keep the incomes of the poorest in...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c95-6GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may deal first with the point made by the noble Baroness, Lady Lister, although I am sure that my noble friend Lord Sassoon will provide a much more sparkling answer. My answer is that, as we look forward into a world where the poorest are supported by universal...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c95GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a lot easier to spend £6.6 billion extra than to remove it. I accept that noble Lords are pleased that we are sticking to the CPI to September figure—the 5.2 per cent—even though it is a high figure. It is important for the Government to do...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c92-4GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may intervene. I am sorry, but I did not know whether the Minister was about to wind up, so perhaps I could revert to a couple of the questions which are left outstanding. In relation to the savings credit and passported benefit, the issue is that if there...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c94-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am happy to add that to my long list of things that I will be taking to the Deputy Prime Minister from time to time. I am pleased to make a short intervention in this debate. I, too, was massively relieved that the full uprating undertaking was...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c89-91GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall take up the point on which my noble friend concluded, and that is about the certainty which the Government have provided for those with pensions. The Government have done what they said they intended to do in terms of providing the triple lock, to which I...

Member
Lord German (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c91-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, at the start, we acknowledge that the Government have rejected the voices within their ranks that would have watered down even the full CPI increase for these upratings. The order before us deals with the most out-of-work benefits, but it of course does not deal with changes to...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c85-8GC
House
House of Lords

That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2012. Relevant document: 40th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments. That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c82GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2012, the Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2012 and the Pensions Act 2008 (Abolition of Protected Rights) (Consequential Amendments) (No. 2) Order 2012 were laid before the House on 30 January 2012, and I am satisfied that they are compatible with the...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c82-5GC
House
House of Lords

To save the Minister getting up and down, I would appreciate a comment on the point that I made about child benefit. Perhaps it is more appropriate for the noble Lord, Lord Sassoon. What is the logic of putting so much emphasis on increasing personal tax allowance in real terms...

Member
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c95GC
House
House of Lords

Are they expected in February?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c96GC
House
House of Lords

Yes, so we are expecting them reasonably soon. I can say to the noble Lord—I cannot give anything away and I have only anecdotal feedback—that I am looking forward very much to these figures. I know that he will want, as he has in the past, to say that the...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c96-7GC
House
House of Lords

I tried to avoid getting to my feet but there is an outstanding issue related to the Work Programme and the reports on that.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c96GC
House
House of Lords

My concentration has been completely broken as to that point.

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c96GC
House
House of Lords

Because there was no impact assessment with the orders and the issues around the Work Programme, can we have an update on its performance?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c96GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for reminding me. Because the Work Programme is a payment-by-results system, you see the results later than with those programmes paid for on a pro forma basis. I am not sure of the exact date but I think that we are looking to publish the...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2012
Reference
735 c96GC
House
House of Lords