Skip to main content

1-20 of 4,039 results for member:"Baroness Noakes"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

In Committee, it is normal to address the amendments and not opposition parties’ policy documents.

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c109GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have some experience of ring-fencing as, in my capacity as the chairman of the risk committee of a major bank, I oversaw the implementation of ring-fencing. At that time, it was a significant risk to the bank that we would not be in compliance with the ring-fencing...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c113GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I understand the point that the noble Lord is trying to make, but I argue that the risk of the taxpayer picking up the tab is now considerably lower, which means that it is reasonable to re-examine whether ring-fencing should be an ongoing part of the regime.

I was...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c114GC
House
House of Lords

Not content.

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 c50GC
House
House of Lords

I am merely keeping to what I said on the first Committee day.

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 c50GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Noakes

152: Clause 37, page 43, line 10, leave out “section 408A” and insert “sections 408A or 408B”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment requires the Treasury to consult the regulators about regulations which designate countries or territories for recognition.

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 c54GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving this amendment, I will speak also to Amendment 153 and the Clause 37 stand part notice.

I am instinctively suspicious of Clause 37 because I think that the best people to judge whether overseas financial services firms should be able to operate in the UK, and to...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 cc54-6GC
House
House of Lords

Before I decide what to do with my amendment, I ask the Minister—because I may not have been paying attention—whether he explained why there is a requirement to consult the regulators for powers under new Section 408A but not under new Section 408B.

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 c60GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister is stacking up rather a lot of letters that need to be written.

I thank all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate. It raises important issues. The Minister said, in relation to consultation, that the Treasury would summarise the evidence. That is not the same as being...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 c60GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister referred to the four workstreams that the Chancellor set up last year. Can he say when firms might feel any difference?

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 c18GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Noakes

142F: After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—

“Offices for regulatory evaluation

(1) The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 is amended as follows.

(2) After section 1RB (requirements in connection with public consultations), insert—

“FCA Office for Regulatory Evaluation

1RC FCA Office for Regulatory Evaluation

(1) The FCA must establish and maintain...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 cc38-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Bowles of Berkhamsted, the noble Lord, Lord Vaux of Harrowden, and my noble friend Lord Bridges of Headley for adding their names to this amendment.

Last week, we debated the need for more extensive regulatory evaluation in order to hold the...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 cc40-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have taken part in this short debate. I know that it is, in part, a repeat of debates we have

held already in Committee, but it is bringing together such an important issue, which is the strength of the accountability mechanisms for...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 cc44-5GC
House
House of Lords

Not content.

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 c45GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister and I had a meeting on this last week, so I am surprised that he is raising the issue today. I notified on Friday that I would be continuing the line that I had taken on the first Committee day.

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 c45GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will just comment briefly. I completely agree with the notion that wholesale markets and retail markets should be dealt with separately for the reasons that have been given. I am less than clear that a structural solution, such as the one proposed by my noble friend Lord...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 c15GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken today and the previous day. These amendments all relate to the secondary competitive and growth objective. I think that we share the same desire to have an effective secondary competitive and growth objective, which my lead amendment, in particular, was...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c469GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have Amendment 118 in this group. As the noble Baroness, Lady Bowles, noted, it is aimed at the same target as her Amendment 117. Both of us are focusing on the regulators needing to have some specific and serious concerns about regulatory breaches before triggering a Section...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc480-1GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister made great play of the importance of proportionality, on which I think there would be considerable agreement. The Bill removes the requirements to have regard to the regulatory principles, including, importantly, the proportionality paragraphs, for anything other than the five-year plan. It is therefore incumbent on the Government...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c483GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Noakes

119: After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—

“Cost benefit panels

(1) The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 is amended as follows.

(2) In subsection (4) of section 138IA, insert after paragraph (a)—

“(aa) keep under review the cumulative impact of rules issued by the FCA including those covered by...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc483-5GC
House
House of Lords