Skip to main content

1-20 of 6,570 results for member:"Charles Clarke"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My intervention follows the hon. Gentleman's answer to the hon. Member for Colchester (Bob Russell). The hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) stated that the Conservative Opposition, if they were in government, would never impose unitary government. Did I understand that right? Is he saying that if the...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2010
Reference
507 c221
House
House of Commons

For three reasons. First, as I said, it will be a new council—that is important—all-out elected in 2011, with new chief officers and a new situation. Secondly, I believe that there will be genuine economies in various areas as a result of a unitary authority with services working together. Thirdly,...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2010
Reference
507 c246
House
House of Commons

I am glad the hon. Gentleman has made that clear. I thought that with great subtlety he had ducked the point and not carried it through. I thought there had been a shift of policy, so I am glad he has clarified that. The reason for unitary local government is...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2010
Reference
507 c247
House
House of Commons

I am delighted that this debate is taking place. First of all, and following the remarks of the Chair of the Select Committee, it is important to say that it directly affects the constituents of just three constituencies—my constituency of Norwich, South, and the constituencies of Norwich, North and of...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2010
Reference
507 c245-6
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has said that he will use his powers to block the proposal in whatever way he can. Does he accept that in so doing, he will be explicitly going against the positions of the Liberal Democrat candidate in Norwich, South and the leader of the Liberal Democrat...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2010
Reference
507 c252
House
House of Commons

I put a simple challenge to the Opposition parties. Let us add up the votes cast on general election day for the candidates in Norwich, South and Norwich, North, according to their attitude on unitary status. I predict we will find that the overwhelming majority of votes have been cast...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2010
Reference
507 c248
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman talks about attitudes to this issue and the idea of having a convention, so does he concede that the leader of the Liberal Democrat group on Norwich city council, Councillor Brian Watkins, and his colleagues, and my Lib Dem political opponent at the general election, Simon Wright—this...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2010
Reference
507 c239
House
House of Commons

I beg your pardon. The Tory county council has decided to ask the director of planning, Mike Jackson, to take the decisions because it wants to run away from the responsibilities. It is extraordinary. My final point is that Norwich is already among the top five shopping centres in the...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2010
Reference
507 c247-8
House
House of Commons

Can my right hon. Friend confirm that, in the city of Norwich at the moment, public workers work either for the county or for the city, so there are two separate human resources functions, two separate finance functions and two separate PR functions? People in planning are working entirely in...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2010
Reference
507 c232-3
House
House of Commons

With respect to the hon. Gentleman, I think that I am in a better position to comment on that than he is, as far as the city of Norwich is concerned. The challenge I put to him and his Front Benchers is that they look to the general election when...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
506 c214-5WH
House
House of Commons

I do not concede that in any way. For a long time, Labour's view in Norwich has been that it is better for local elections to coincide with general elections because turnout is higher in general elections, and that is what we, as a Labour party, generally favour. These orders...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
506 c213-4WH
House
House of Commons

Fifteen minutes into his speech, the hon. Gentleman has not identified one single respect in which the proposal for a unitary Norwich could damage his constituents' interests. Will he address that?

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
506 c209WH
House
House of Commons

I apologise for having a cold today; I hope it does not spread to too many Opposition Members. Perhaps I may begin with the fundamentals of the argument, which are that the case for unitary local government is very strong. It is accepted all across Scotland, Wales and urban England,...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
506 c212WH
House
House of Commons

I have not seen the remarks that the hon. and learned Gentleman refers to, so I will not comment on them. I agree that Ministers should take responsibility for their decisions. I have carried that through in my own political career; it is important not to offload on civil servants....

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
506 c213WH
House
House of Commons

I was trying to make the point that, if Members argue that there are effects on their own constituents outside Norwich, or for that matter outside Exeter, it is incumbent upon them to explain what those impacts are. I have not yet heard—not just today, but ever—any serious argument that...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
506 c223-4WH
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman confirm that, in the case of Norwich, this process was initiated some years ago, when the Liberal Democrats ran Norwich city council and strongly supported the process? It remains the case that the Liberal Democrats in Norwich support the proposal of a unitary Norwich authority, based...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
506 c221WH
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
506 c205WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has not so far addressed in what respect the proposals would damage the interests of his constituents. I can see why he may have a general argument about the unitary pattern for Norfolk—he is entitled to make that case—but which specific interests of his constituents would be...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
506 c206WH
House
House of Commons

Is the hon. Gentleman saying he believes that a Norfolk county council covering 85 per cent. of its current area would deliver significantly worse services?

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
506 c225WH
House
House of Commons

The Petition of persons resident in the Norwich South parliamentary constituency, Declares that they are concerned about the recommendations of the Badman Report, which suggests closer monitoring of home educators, including a compulsory annual registration scheme and right of access to people's homes for local authority officials; further declares that...

Lead member
Charles Clarke
Type
Paper petitions
Date
8 December 2009
Reference
502 c273
House
House of Commons