Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,746 results for member:"David Howarth"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what recent assessment he has made of the level of qualifications required for teachers at (a) post-16 colleges and (b) sixth forms attached to secondary schools; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1585W;508 c1585-6W; 319472
House
House of Commons

I accept that there is all sorts of interesting research on first past the post, but all this seems to be entirely missing the point that first past the post can never be fair or proportionate, is always biased in one direction or another and is capable of producing illegitimate...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1218
House
House of Commons

The hon. and learned Gentleman is right; it is a jemmy in the door, which we intend at some stage to use. I give way for the final time.

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1217
House
House of Commons

The Conservatives support the system for the obvious reason that occasionally, and in some decades for very long periods, it gives them absolute power. They prefer a system that gives them absolute power, which they exchange with the Labour party now and then, to a system that is fair to...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1217
House
House of Commons

I am all in favour of making the electoral system fairer. That is why I oppose the amendment, because the only way to make the first-past-the-post system fairer is by abolishing it and replacing it with a better system. I concede that, as the Secretary of State said, the AV...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1216-7
House
House of Commons

That is a very good metaphor. In fact, that proposal combined with the other Conservative proposal to reduce the number of Members of Parliament would make the existing system even less proportionate.

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1216
House
House of Commons

The timing of this discussion is quite extraordinary. The day after the Prime Minister announced a programme that appears to include a referendum on electoral reform, the Government will have to troop through the Lobby to oppose that very policy. It seems to be a pattern that the Labour party...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1216
House
House of Commons

But Europe has PR.

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1204
House
House of Commons

I agree with the Minister. The idea that fiddling with boundaries based on out-of-date information can make the first-past-the-post system fairer is absurd. The only way to get a fair electoral system is to have a more proportionate system. The first virtue of a representative body, such as the House...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1217
House
House of Commons

That is a very good point. I noticed that yesterday the Crime and Security Bill went through the other place without having to be sent back to this place. That Bill could have been used for the same purpose, but was not. That is a catastrophe as well. It seems...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1208
House
House of Commons

The way in which the Bill has been handled throughout has been catastrophic. The Government delayed the Committee stage in this House, randomly extended it and failed to secure the Bill in the House of Lords, for which they are entirely to blame. Especially on items such as the referendum...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1207-8
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is entirely right. Do we have just another political manoeuvre, whereby the Government appear to be in favour of something without actually doing it? I regret wasting the time of a large number of hon. Members, which need not have happened. I approve of other amendments in...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1209
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I was tempted along that route by the Secretary of State's opening remarks, which were more general. I shall end this part of my remarks by saying that we were excluded from the process and therefore have no loyalty to it. I regret that the...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1209
House
House of Commons

The answer is yes, and that would also apply to the reforms of this place itself. Changing the electoral system is important for democracy throughout our system— One hour having elapsed since the commencement of proceedings on consideration of Lords amendments, the debate was interrupted (Order, 7 April). The Deputy...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1218
House
House of Commons

This really is the last intervention.

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1218
House
House of Commons

We on the Liberal Democrat Benches are content with the amendment. Lords amendment 6 agreed to.

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1214
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman confirm that in the current wash-up, the Government and the Conservative party are doing the negotiating, and excluding all other parties? How can he explain his remark about minority parties having disproportionate power when, for example, the Government have no majority in the House of Lords?

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c314WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to speak under your chairmanship, Mr. Fraser, although this is the last time, as both of us are leaving the House. I thank the hon. Member for Reading, West (Martin Salter) for negotiating his way to this debate. He said a lot of things, many of...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c310-1WH
House
House of Commons

One of the problems with such research is defining "business" as including all sorts of businesses. I would be interested in finding out the sorts of business that people were engaged in and the kinds of position they held. Should we despair of the present situation in politics and of...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c311-2WH
House
House of Commons

I, too, very much welcome the Bill. The hon. Member for Huntingdon (Mr. Djanogly) is right to say that it has taken a long time to reach this stage, although he is not right to say that the Bill has been particularly rushed, given the vast amount of discussion about...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c1012-3
House
House of Commons