Skip to main content

1-20 of 6,901 results for member:"David Winnick"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Because Question 1 was closed, there was no opportunity to follow up that particular point about the west midlands. Is it possible to put it on the record that, if there had been an opportunity, Labour Members—certainly me and other hon. Members from...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
624 c1115
House
House of Commons

Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker. In order that there should be no misunderstanding, because the right hon. Member for New Forest West

(Sir Desmond Swayne) gave the strong impression that I was not standing, I was desperately trying to catch your eye. If I may say so,...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
624 c1116
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Sir Edward, for calling me to speak.

I am pleased to follow the hon. Member for East Worthing and Shoreham (Tim Loughton), who made some valid points. Because of time, I will simply concentrate on the Willenhall Crown post office in the Walsall Borough. A second attempt is being...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 cc439-440WH
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when she plans to respond to the letter of 6 March 2017 from the hon. Member for Walsall North concerning a constituent, ref T1183944.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2017
Reference
71193
House
House of Commons

Considering how this may be misrepresented abroad, particularly in Russia, is it not important to emphasise that this is first and foremost a matter of human rights, and certainly not a matter confined only to those who happen to be gay? Is it not interesting that this is being discussed...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2017
Reference
624 c787
House
House of Commons

Is the Prime Minister at all concerned that, having tried her best to build a reputation for political integrity both as Home Secretary and Prime Minister, she is now seen, after all the denials that there would be a snap election, simply as a political opportunist?

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2017
Reference
624 c685
House
House of Commons

If the Prime Minister had said when she took office that her Government wanted a general election, there would have been less controversy than there is now, but there has been denial at every opportunity. The Prime Minister or those who speak for her denied that there would be a...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2017
Reference
624 c700
House
House of Commons

I will not, due to the lack of time. The reason given by the Prime Minister for the general election—Brexit—is a feeble, flimsy excuse that is taking in no one.

My hon. Friend the Member for Wolverhampton South West (Rob Marris) said that the Government should not be complacent about getting...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2017
Reference
624 c700
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, when she plans to respond to the letter of 7 March 2017 from the hon. Member for Walsall North on behalf of a constituent, on internet speeds.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 April 2017
Reference
69743
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when she plans to respond to the letter of 7 March 2017 from the hon. Member for Walsall North on behalf of a constituent, on police dogs.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 April 2017
Reference
69742
House
House of Commons

I do not regret any of my votes opposing military intervention in Syria, because at various times we were asked to oppose one side or the other, but if there had been no military

retaliation in response to the chemical attack, is there not a case that it would have...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2017
Reference
624 c559
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, with reference to the letter from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State of 20 February 2017 to the hon. Member for Walsall North, reference MC421056/ON, which stated that a decision would be reached on the public inquiry into land...

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 March 2017
Reference
69380
House
House of Commons

Given the reference of some Members to the British people, is it not important to recognise that a large majority of this country’s people are not fanatically for or against the UK being in the European Union? If we want to bring the people together, as the Prime Minister says...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2017
Reference
624 c273
House
House of Commons

Everyone wants to see territory liberated from the murderers of the so-called Islamic State, but is the Foreign Secretary aware of the deep concern over the recent air strikes, which have caused the death of so many innocent civilians, including children? There was no attempt to save the children. Is he aware of how important it is to try to minimise civilian tragedies, and will he make representations accordingly?

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 March 2017
Reference
624 c126
House
House of Commons

We recognise the immense bravery of all concerned yesterday, but should we not also recognise that, unfortunately, terror attacks are likely to continue for years to come and, needless to say, this country is not unique in Europe, let alone elsewhere, in having such onslaughts against us. Arising from what...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2017
Reference
623 c939
House
House of Commons

Those of us who were here at the time remember how difficult it was to restore the reputation of this House after the expenses scandal. Is there not a wider issue here about how the public look upon what they describe as the political class and about the feeling, justified...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2017
Reference
623 c645
House
House of Commons

That this House considers it would be more appropriate for messages from HM the Queen to be notified accordingly at the despatch box rather than by the current ceremonial practice of a whip coming into the Chamber carrying their wand of office, a stick and then walking to the table...

Primary sponsor
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
20 March 2017
Reference
1085
House
House of Commons

I recognise and respect what the Secretary of State has told the House, and we all appreciate her keeping the House up to date. I again say that this is not a question of any kind of vendetta against Mr Murdoch, but it would be simply unacceptable for the amount...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2017
Reference
623 c561
House
House of Commons

That this House believes that it is not at all necessary for a Committee to be appointed to draw up reasons to be assigned for disagreeing to the House of Lords in its amendments, as on 13 March 2017, Official Report, column 82; and further believes that such a procedure...

Primary sponsor
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
15 March 2017
Reference
1075
House
House of Commons

That this House recognises that police officers often place themselves in the way of harm to protect their communities, sometimes making the ultimate sacrifice and leaving behind families and loved ones; is deeply concerned that the Police Pension Regulations 1987 do not allow police widows or widowers the opportunity to...

Primary sponsor
Tim Farron (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
14 March 2017
Reference
1063
House
House of Commons