1-20 of 1,353 results for member:"James Wild"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.343 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- member:"James Wild"
- We searched for
- member_ses:465009
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what the average waiting time was for cases handled by the Housing Ombudsman in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what the average waiting time was for cases handled by the Housing Ombudsman in each of the last five years.
The average waiting time for cases handled by the Housing Ombudsman in each of the last five financial years is:
Determined Cases Average Months to Determine
2021/22 2,238 5
2022/23 2,371 6
2023/24 4,908 11
2024/25 6,115 7
2025/26 8,791 8
The current oldest case is 22 months since it formally entered the Ombudsman's jurisdiction for investigation. The Service expects no case to be older than 18 months by 31st March 2027.
The caseworker-to-complaint ratio within the Housing Ombudsman service is 39:1.
The backlog of cases that exceed 12 months since they formally entered the Ombudsman's jurisdiction for investigation is set out below.
Backlog of Unresolved Cases
2023/24 283
2024/25 0
2025/26 2,458
Current 2,235
The proportion of complaints which were resolved within target timeframes in each of the last five is below.
Determined Within: 6 Months 12 Months
2022/23 N/A 100%
2023/24 54% 87%
2023/24 18% 62%
2024/25 46% 89%
2025/26 53% 78%
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what the current backlog of unresolved cases at the Housing Ombudsman is, and how that figure compares to each year since 2020.
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what the current backlog of unresolved cases at the Housing Ombudsman is, and how that figure compares to each year since 2020.
The average waiting time for cases handled by the Housing Ombudsman in each of the last five financial years is:
Determined Cases Average Months to Determine
2021/22 2,238 5
2022/23 2,371 6
2023/24 4,908 11
2024/25 6,115 7
2025/26 8,791 8
The current oldest case is 22 months since it formally entered the Ombudsman's jurisdiction for investigation. The Service expects no case to be older than 18 months by 31st March 2027.
The caseworker-to-complaint ratio within the Housing Ombudsman service is 39:1.
The backlog of cases that exceed 12 months since they formally entered the Ombudsman's jurisdiction for investigation is set out below.
Backlog of Unresolved Cases
2023/24 283
2024/25 0
2025/26 2,458
Current 2,235
The proportion of complaints which were resolved within target timeframes in each of the last five is below.
Determined Within: 6 Months 12 Months
2022/23 N/A 100%
2023/24 54% 87%
2023/24 18% 62%
2024/25 46% 89%
2025/26 53% 78%
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what proportion of complaints to the Housing Ombudsman were resolved within target timeframes in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what proportion of complaints to the Housing Ombudsman were resolved within target timeframes in each of the last five years.
The average waiting time for cases handled by the Housing Ombudsman in each of the last five financial years is:
Determined Cases Average Months to Determine
2021/22 2,238 5
2022/23 2,371 6
2023/24 4,908 11
2024/25 6,115 7
2025/26 8,791 8
The current oldest case is 22 months since it formally entered the Ombudsman's jurisdiction for investigation. The Service expects no case to be older than 18 months by 31st March 2027.
The caseworker-to-complaint ratio within the Housing Ombudsman service is 39:1.
The backlog of cases that exceed 12 months since they formally entered the Ombudsman's jurisdiction for investigation is set out below.
Backlog of Unresolved Cases
2023/24 283
2024/25 0
2025/26 2,458
Current 2,235
The proportion of complaints which were resolved within target timeframes in each of the last five is below.
Determined Within: 6 Months 12 Months
2022/23 N/A 100%
2023/24 54% 87%
2023/24 18% 62%
2024/25 46% 89%
2025/26 53% 78%
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what the longest recorded time is for a complaint currently being handled by the Housing Ombudsman.
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what the longest recorded time is for a complaint currently being handled by the Housing Ombudsman.
The average waiting time for cases handled by the Housing Ombudsman in each of the last five financial years is:
Determined Cases Average Months to Determine
2021/22 2,238 5
2022/23 2,371 6
2023/24 4,908 11
2024/25 6,115 7
2025/26 8,791 8
The current oldest case is 22 months since it formally entered the Ombudsman's jurisdiction for investigation. The Service expects no case to be older than 18 months by 31st March 2027.
The caseworker-to-complaint ratio within the Housing Ombudsman service is 39:1.
The backlog of cases that exceed 12 months since they formally entered the Ombudsman's jurisdiction for investigation is set out below.
Backlog of Unresolved Cases
2023/24 283
2024/25 0
2025/26 2,458
Current 2,235
The proportion of complaints which were resolved within target timeframes in each of the last five is below.
Determined Within: 6 Months 12 Months
2022/23 N/A 100%
2023/24 54% 87%
2023/24 18% 62%
2024/25 46% 89%
2025/26 53% 78%
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what the caseworker-to-complaint ratio is within the Housing Ombudsman service.
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what the caseworker-to-complaint ratio is within the Housing Ombudsman service.
The average waiting time for cases handled by the Housing Ombudsman in each of the last five financial years is:
Determined Cases Average Months to Determine
2021/22 2,238 5
2022/23 2,371 6
2023/24 4,908 11
2024/25 6,115 7
2025/26 8,791 8
The current oldest case is 22 months since it formally entered the Ombudsman's jurisdiction for investigation. The Service expects no case to be older than 18 months by 31st March 2027.
The caseworker-to-complaint ratio within the Housing Ombudsman service is 39:1.
The backlog of cases that exceed 12 months since they formally entered the Ombudsman's jurisdiction for investigation is set out below.
Backlog of Unresolved Cases
2023/24 283
2024/25 0
2025/26 2,458
Current 2,235
The proportion of complaints which were resolved within target timeframes in each of the last five is below.
Determined Within: 6 Months 12 Months
2022/23 N/A 100%
2023/24 54% 87%
2023/24 18% 62%
2024/25 46% 89%
2025/26 53% 78%
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of HM Revenue and Custom’s readiness to implement the vaping products duty stamp scheme on schedule.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of HM Revenue and Custom’s readiness to implement the vaping products duty stamp scheme on schedule.
The Government is introducing Vaping Products Duty and the Vaping Duty Stamps scheme to make vaping less accessible to young people and non-smokers, while raising revenue to support vital public services, including the NHS and smoking cessation initiatives. The Vaping Duty Stamps scheme will provide HMRC with greater oversight of the vaping market and strengthen its ability to target fraud and criminality.
HMRC remains confident that both the Vaping Products Duty and the Vaping Duty Stamps scheme will go live on 1 October 2026.
However, recognising industry feedback that some businesses may struggle to implement all of the changes required by then, HMRC has recently decided to extend the "transitional stamp" arrangements of the scheme for an additional three months.
This means businesses who are not ready to use the full digital features of the scheme can instead use a highly secure stamp without digital elements until the end of the year. This will support legitimate businesses to meet their legal requirements. The full digital scheme will be in operation for businesses who are ready to integrate with it.
Every new vaping product must be duty paid and must carry either a transitional stamp or a digitally enhanced stamp from 1 October.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of extending permitted development rights for agricultural reservoirs.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of extending permitted development rights for agricultural reservoirs.
Reservoirs are reasonably necessary for agricultural purposes and can already be developed under an existing Permitted Development Right. We recognise that navigating planning flexibilities can be challenging, therefore we intend to update the relevant Planning Practice Guidance in the coming months with additional guidance to make it easier for farmers to utilise the Permitted Development Right in practice.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, when HM Revenue and Customs plan to issue retailer-facing guidance on their requirements under the vaping products duty stamp scheme.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, when HM Revenue and Customs plan to issue retailer-facing guidance on their requirements under the vaping products duty stamp scheme.
HMRC published retailer-facing guidance on 9 July 2026.
The guidance explains what is required of both retailers and wholesalers for Vaping Products Duty and the Vaping Duty Stamps scheme. Retailers can find this guidance by searching “Handling wholesale or retail vaping products in the UK” on GOV.UK.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what contingency measures HM Revenue and Customs has developed in the event that the digital duty stamp system for vaping products is not fully operational by 1 October 2026.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what contingency measures HM Revenue and Customs has developed in the event that the digital duty stamp system for vaping products is not fully operational by 1 October 2026.
Vaping Products Duty and the Vaping Duty Stamp scheme will be fully operational on 1 October 2026. Recognising industry feedback that some businesses may struggle to implement all of the changes required on day one of the scheme, HMRC has recently decided to extend the "transitional stamp" arrangements of the scheme for an additional three months.
This means businesses who are not ready to use the full digital features of the scheme, can instead use a highly secure stamp without digital elements until the end of the year. This will support legitimate businesses to meet their legal requirements. The full digital scheme will be in operation for businesses who are ready to integrate with it.
Every new vaping product must be duty paid and must carry either a transitional stamp or a digitally enhanced stamp from 1 October.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what plans she has to expand the use of dynamic abstraction licensing to support water resource management across catchments.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what plans she has to expand the use of dynamic abstraction licensing to support water resource management across catchments.
Defra is taking steps to move towards a more dynamic abstraction licensing system.
The Environment Agency (EA) supports innovative approaches to abstraction that ensure the rights of other abstractors are protected, while safeguarding the environment. Defra and the EA are facilitating an MHCLG Cambridge Growth funded trial of smart agricultural abstraction in East Anglia this year. The trial will use new technologies to monitor water flows and abstraction, maximising water availability. The EA are also developing digital systems to enable more responsive abstraction management. The Government plans to bring abstraction and impoundment regulation into the Environmental Permitting Regulations, providing a more flexible legislative framework.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what plans her Department has for future rounds of the Water Management Grant.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what plans her Department has for future rounds of the Water Management Grant.
Defra recognises the importance of improving on farm water resilience and efficiency, particularly given the increasingly dry conditions. Defra officials are reviewing lessons from previous rounds of the Water Management Grant, drawing on stakeholder feedback and considering how any future offer might be streamlined. Future arrangements for the grant are being considered, any updates will be provided in due course.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of the duration of abstraction licences for farms.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of the duration of abstraction licences for farms.
Time limits are a legislative requirement for abstraction licences. The Environment Agency (EA) issues licences with time limits from 6 to 18 years in line with its approach to managing water abstraction. Applicants can apply for a long duration licence for up to 24 years. The EA are reviewing the criteria to make it easier to apply for a long duration licence. The Government plans to move abstraction and impoundment regulation into the Environmental Permitting Regulations to improve how we use water resources; new permits will be issued without time limits.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps her Department is taking to support increased on-farm water storage capacity to capture high winter flows for use during periods of lower water availability.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps her Department is taking to support increased on-farm water storage capacity to capture high winter flows for use during periods of lower water availability.
The Government encourages the use of reservoirs to store high winter flows. The Environment Agency (EA) have committed to review its approach to abstraction at high flows and its approach to long duration licences.
We are also taking the following measures to support the development of new on farm reservoirs to capture high-flow water after heavy rainfall:
- The EA supported Water Resources East to create a leaflet to help farmers developing on-farm storage.
- Our Local Resource Options studies are enabling small groups of farmers and growers to identify future water resilience projects in their areas including irrigation reservoirs.
- Defra officials are also working closely with MHCLG to clarify planning practice for permitted development rights to support the creation of on farm reservoirs.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps his Department is taking to support the establishment of additional Agricultural Water Abstractor groups.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps his Department is taking to support the establishment of additional Agricultural Water Abstractor groups.
The Government continues to encourage the establishment and strengthening of Water Abstractor Groups (WAGs). These groups bring together abstractors within a catchment to share information, coordinate abstraction and increase agriculture’s input into local, regional and national planning, in particular informing regional water resources groups’ planning. Funding from Defra for the Regional Groups to improve agricultural water resources planning has helped increase the number of WAGs from 8 to 14, with a further three forecast for 2026/27.
Defra & the Environment Agency have supported the production of booklets on how to form WAGs.
Defra Farming are also offering a new Farming Collaboration fund which is open to new and existing groups for funding to support sharing expertise, stronger bargaining power and better business resilience all of which are shared aims of WAGs.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to support research to identify a cure for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to support research to identify a cure for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
The Department commissions research through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and invests over £1.8 billion a year on applied health and care research. The NIHR welcomes funding applications for research into any aspect of human health including Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) and clinical trials for therapeutics. Applications are subject to peer review and judged in open competition, with awards being made on the basis of the importance of the topic to patients and health and care services, value for money, and scientific quality.
Since 2002, the NIHR has made available over £43 million of funding for research to address key evidence gaps on variant CJD including the development of a treatment for variant CJD, a diagnostic test for sub-clinical variant CJD, and decontamination of surgical instruments.
Recognising the devasting impact of CJD on patients and their loved ones as well as the current lack of a treatment, Department officials met with the Director of the Medical Research Council’s Prion Unit in October 2024 to discuss possible clinical trials for a candidate therapeutic, namely prion protein monoclonal antibody therapy, for CJD. The researchers were advised to explore the NIHR Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme as a route of funding.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 13 July 2026 to Question 15445 on Department of Health and Social Care: Public Expenditure, if she will set out which capital programmes have been identified as having flexibility for the redeployment of capital...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 13 July 2026 to Question 15445 on Department of Health and Social Care: Public Expenditure, if she will set out which capital programmes have been identified as having flexibility for the redeployment of capital...
Capital budgets are managed flexibly within the Department's overall capital expenditure limits to maximise delivery against agreed priorities and outcomes.
The Department does not routinely identify specific programmes in advance for the redeployment of capital funding. Decisions are taken in-year based on delivery performance, emerging pressures, and departmental priorities. Where there is a need to reprofile expenditure between financial years, this must be considered and agreed with HM Treasury through the Supplementary Estimates process.
The Central Government Supply Estimates set out the budgets approved by Parliament, including the net budget for NHS Providers and the Department’s Programme and Administration expenditure. The Department has no plans to publish any additional breakdown beyond that information.
Twice in one day!
Twice in one day!
The Minister failed to respond to any of the questions asked by the shadow Minister, my hon. Friend the Member for Reigate (Rebecca Paul), so I will try again: some companies have expressed an interest in the business, so what discussions is the Minister, or his colleagues, having with potential...
The Minister failed to respond to any of the questions asked by the shadow Minister, my hon. Friend the Member for Reigate (Rebecca Paul), so I will try again: some companies have expressed an interest in the business, so what discussions is the Minister, or his colleagues, having with potential...
Passengers on the Fen line from King’s Lynn are suffering repeated cancellations and an unacceptably poor level of service. Now that the Government control both the track and the trains, will the Transport Secretary intervene and demand a robust action plan to sort out this poor performance?
Passengers on the Fen line from King’s Lynn are suffering repeated cancellations and an unacceptably poor level of service. Now that the Government control both the track and the trains, will the Transport Secretary intervene and demand a robust action plan to sort out this poor performance?
As I said earlier, publicly owned operators are performing better, on average, when it comes to reliability and cancellations. On the particular issue with the Fen line that the hon. Gentleman raises on behalf of his constituents, I will seek more information about what is causing the problems there and what plans the local operators have to improve the situation for him and his constituents.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of introducing Enhertu for use in the NHS.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of introducing Enhertu for use in the NHS.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for South Basildon and East Thurrock on 29 June 2026 to Question 11564.