Skip to main content

1-20 of 7,737 results for member:"Lord Beith"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, there has been unanimity around this Chamber in welcoming the fact that we are debating the rule of law in the week in which we honour and commemorate a great upholder of the rule of law, Lord Mackay of Clashfern. There is also a degree of unity around...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc368-370
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Lord can withdraw his amendment, we need to give the noble Baroness the opportunity to indicate what she wants to do with her amendment to his amendment.

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2026
Reference
857 c727
House
House of Lords

Just to be clear, the noble Lord is moving Amendment 83. Amendment 86 is in this group, and the noble Lord is free to speak to it, but he is moving Amendment 83.

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2026
Reference
857 c728
House
House of Lords

Lords announcement on conduct of proceedings in Grand Committee.

Lead member
Lord Beith
Type
Non-legislative formal proceedings
Date
18 June 2026
Reference
857 c117GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if there is a Division in the Chamber while we are sitting, the Committee will adjourn as soon as the Division Bells are rung and resume after 10 minutes.

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2026
Reference
857 c117GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes of Cumnock, is taking part remotely and I invite him to contribute now.

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c97
House
House of Lords

Lords announcement on conduct of proceedings in Grand Committee.

Lead member
Lord Beith
Type
Non-legislative formal proceedings
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 c465GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if there is a Division in the Chamber while we are sitting, this Committee will adjourn as soon as the Division Bells are rung and resume after 10 minutes.

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 c465GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is a Division in the Chamber. The Committee will adjourn and return in 10 minutes.

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 c478GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the process leading up to advising on Royal Assent is one in which the UK Government examines island legislation to see if it has unintended effects in the United Kingdom. Is that process being gone through and, if so, how, given that we do not know what the Government’s position would be on such fundamental questions as whether assisted dying would be provided within or outside the National Health Service, and all the dependencies rely on specialist medical help from hospitals in England?

Asked by
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 March 2026
Reference
853 c1146
House
House of Lords

I will speak briefly to my amendment in this group because it is my duty shortly to chair the Committee. To broaden the debate that the noble Baroness, Lady Cass, introduced, I simply say that there is clearly a need to establish that this post can have confidence and a...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2026
Reference
853 c861
House
House of Lords

I call the noble Lord, Lord Davies of Gower, to move Amendment 13. I must advise that if it is not moved, I cannot call Amendment 14.

Clause 9: Guidance on fly-tipping enforcement in England

Amendment 13

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc641-597
House
House of Lords

Has the Minister assessed the impact of the new timetable on east coast main line punctuality? There have been some very severe delays, which are mainly infrastructure-related and therefore the responsibility of Network Rail, a different nationalised company. It appears that the new timetable does not give space to deal with delays when they arise.

Asked by
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 February 2026
Reference
852 c1292
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Shinkwin, and the noble Baroness, Lady Campbell of Surbiton, will be taking part remotely. I remind the Committee that unless they are leading a group, remote speakers speak first after the mover of the lead amendment in a group and may therefore speak to...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 January 2026
Reference
852 c519
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister realise that, since the new timetable was introduced on the east coast main line, there has been no room to deal with delays such as those caused by broken rails, signal failures and points failures, none of which can be blamed on LNER as they are all the responsibility of Network Rail. Are lessons going to be learned about the introduction of this timetable, which took several years to bring about but reduced services from stations such as Berwick and Durham and left real problems coping with delays?

Asked by
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 January 2026
Reference
852 c125
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord has moved the amendment, and the opportunity is there for other Members to speak to it.

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 December 2025
Reference
851 c794
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord talked about bureaucratic impediments. A later amendment of mine addresses the bureaucratic impediment that if you are a resident in England and Wales who lives a few miles from a general practice in Scotland, and you are registered with that practice, you are disqualified from the scope...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2025
Reference
850 c2072
House
House of Lords

What I am talking about is a group of people who live in England, are ordinarily resident in England, but who happen to be registered with a general practice in Scotland. That has no impact on what the Scottish situation would be in other respects—that is a matter for the...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2025
Reference
850 c2090
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is a curious diffidence over so important a part of the Bill as Clause 1. I shall not say much about it, except that, although the amendments are worth studying to see whether they do improve how Clause 1 can operate, they seem to stem from a...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 November 2025
Reference
850 c1342
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Beith

45: Clause 4, page 14, line 10, after “crime” insert “, with a view to protecting them”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment is intended to clarify that the purposes of sentencing specifically include the protection of victims of crime.

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 November 2025
Reference
850 c1396
House
House of Lords