Skip to main content

1-20 of 146 results for member:"Lord Boyce"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I also find the Minister’s answer about the Type 26 build rate disappointing, particularly given how long it is before the first Type 26 comes into service. It will certainly see our frigate force level drop to being unacceptably low before the new ships come online. Will the Minister say what level our frigate numbers will sink to before the new ships become operational? That also includes the Type 31.

Asked by
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 March 2022
Reference
820 c1084
House
House of Lords

My Lords, given the length of time before the Type 45 numbers will be up to operational scratch, with concomitant effect on our destroyer frigate force levels, will the Minister say what is being done to improve the in-service dates of the Type 31 and Type 26, whose build rate is lamentably slow? Speeding it up will certainly help mitigate the force level problem.

Asked by
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 February 2022
Reference
819 c214
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister not agree that, notwithstanding Brexit, at the working level the relationships between our Armed Forces and those of other European countries, whether bilateral, trilateral or multilateral, are extremely strong and should be nurtured at all costs?

Asked by
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 February 2022
Reference
819 c8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with and support in principle the agreement we are debating. It will strengthen our strategic position in the Indo-Pacific and help to bolster our relationship with the Five Power Defence Arrangements, which is, in my view, necessary in the light of China’s increasing assertiveness in the...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc170-2GC
House
House of Lords

Thank you for allowing me to intervene. Can I return to the Nassau agreement for a moment? I am aware that we are talking about not nuclear weapons but nuclear propulsion, but I quote the Explanatory Memorandum:

“The US-UK Agreement for Co-operation on the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defense...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 c182GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, can the Minister say how many countries have committed to acquiring the Type 26 and Type 31 frigates? How many ships are involved? Has this led to a drop in the unit price cost of those ships and will the foreign orders affect the in-service dates of the ships that are for the Royal Navy?

Asked by
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2021
Reference
816 c1271
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I oppose this amendment. Fundamentally, I believe that it would be seriously detrimental to the chain of command. I have some questions. Will membership be voluntary? Would there be a subscription? Would all Armed Forces members be expected to join?

I want to focus particularly on the purpose mentioned...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2021
Reference
815 c407GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 66A. I will not cover all the ground covered on the overseas Bill; I merely want to say that

I look forward to what the Minister has to say about delivering what she said at the time. Aspects of the welfare of our...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2021
Reference
815 c317GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports; I have two cadets annually as my Lord Warden cadets. I am most grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Lingfield, for securing and initiating this important debate.

There can be no doubt that the sea, Army and RAF...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2021
Reference
814 cc109-110GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government are to be commended for the robust stance taken last week in sanctioning HMS “Defender” to passage, perfectly legitimately, through the international separation zone waters past Crimea, and for us not to succumb to Russian bullying and lying. Does the Minister agree that we should be acting in a similarly robust way in the north, allowing our warships to operate in international waters in the Arctic and the Barents Sea and not allowing Russia to claim such waters as their private seas by default—which will be doubly important as the north-eastern passage to the Far East becomes more accessible? I feel that the Minister’s answer to the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay of St Johns, was not sufficiently robust on that matter.

Asked by
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 2021
Reference
813 c544
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my interest as patron of the Submariners Association. The Minister’s Answer was welcome. Will she pay tribute to the crews of the current Vanguard class, who are having to work extraordinarily and unbelievably hard, with significant sacrifice for themselves and their families, to keep their ageing submarines going to ensure that the continuous at-sea deterrent is sustained? They will have to continue to do so for another 10 years until the Dreadnought class comes into operational service.

Asked by
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 June 2021
Reference
813 c230
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as a submariner I echo the opening part of the Statement and its sentiments regarding condolences to the Indonesian navy and the families of the ship’s company of the submarine KRI Nanggala following its loss. I am sure your Lordships share these sentiments. Considerable fundraising efforts are well...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2021
Reference
811 c2339
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the integrated review, and its accompanying Defence Command Paper and industrial strategy paper, have gone some way to addressing the mistakes made in the awful 2010 defence review and the somewhat less disastrous 2015 strategic defence review. What is particularly to be welcomed is that the threat has...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2021
Reference
811 cc2006-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment 6. The Bill sets out to make better provision about legal proceedings for our Armed Forces when they are or have been engaged on overseas operations. The Bill’s significant emphasis on presumption against prosecution as a way of relieving some of the stress...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 April 2021
Reference
811 c1170
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 13 is about the six-year time limit imposed by the Bill on those who have been engaged on overseas operations, and the ability of such servicepeople to bring any grievances against the MoD after that time. As we have already heard, this would have the perverse effect...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 April 2021
Reference
811 c1221
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as speakers ahead of me, and especially my noble friend Lord Dannatt, spoke eloquently in support of this amendment, I will not tax your Lordships’ patience by repeating all that has been said. However, I wish to reinforce the point that we need something of a more permanent...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 April 2021
Reference
811 c1247
House
House of Lords

My Lords, speakers this afternoon have been, and will be, covering the involvement of Admiral of the Fleet, His Royal Highness The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, in myriad organisations, institutions and good causes. I will cover just one, the Royal Navy, a service to which he was palpably devoted...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 April 2021
Reference
811 c1064
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this comprehensive industrial strategy is very much to be welcomed. I focus on the shipbuilding aspects to seek clarification from the Minister on a couple of points. It would seem that opening competition for building of warships is to be nuanced, to use the expression used by the...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2021
Reference
811 c844
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we should all broadly welcome the defence Command Paper, which puts our Armed Forces in a much better position than they found themselves in after the last two defence reviews. Noble Lords will note the emphasis on a stronger global maritime strategy and persistent forward presence, which should...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2021
Reference
811 c807
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Browne, on this because I agree with the thrust of his comments. The Bill sets out to make statutory provision about legal proceedings for our Armed Forces when they are or have been engaged in overseas operations, which,...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2021
Reference
810 c1527
House
House of Lords