Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,331 results for member:"Lord Clinton-Davis"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What happens if the Minister’s optimism is somewhat misplaced? Does he agree that, in the event that he is wrong, this country must go its own way? In particular, might he form the view that the country is best served by being in the EU? I have been a member...

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2017
Reference
778 c1323
House
House of Lords

Is not the reality that the Secretary of State for Transport is more anxious to prolong the dispute than to find a solution?

Asked by
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 December 2016
Reference
777 c1550
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is it not quite wrong that any citizen should be left in any doubt about this issue, as people undoubtedly are? Will the Minister personally vouch that this issue will be cleared up? People should not be left in any doubt at all.

Asked by
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2016
Reference
777 c1128
House
House of Lords

I speak following the very courageous and relevant speech that we have just heard. I do not think that there can be any possible objection to strengthening the law, which is what is proposed. There can be no dispute at all that corrupt relationships between the police and newspapers are...

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2016
Reference
777 cc233-4
House
House of Lords

Will the Minister indicate how long she envisages the inquiry will take and how many witnesses will come forward?

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2016
Reference
777 c236
House
House of Lords

The understanding is that Gatwick and Heathrow will both be expanded, but this decision is really about Heathrow. Although it

has been provisionally selected, we still have to wait, and there is considerable uncertainty about the future. Meanwhile, Paris, Frankfurt and Schiphol will not wait, and British aviation will, regrettably,...

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2016
Reference
776 c144
House
House of Lords

Will the Minister assure the House that no minors are being treated illiberally or will be in the future?

Asked by
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 October 2016
Reference
774 c2341
House
House of Lords

How long have the Government and others had to make up their minds about London’s additional runways? Does the Minister believe that it is possible for some sort of decision to be advanced rather than, as I fear it will be, regarded as something that can be withdrawn?

Asked by
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 October 2016
Reference
774 c1783
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Spicer, on his unremitting campaign for the best interests of British aviation. Is it not clear that the longer a decision on this vital issue is delayed, the worse it will be for British aviation? In my view, a decision should have been made long ago, and the Government are playing for time. The more we encounter delay, the more British aviation will suffer while its rivals manage to march forward unremittingly.

Asked by
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 September 2016
Reference
774 c853
House
House of Lords

When do the Government expect to make a decision on this issue? It has been delayed for so long, and every delay results in grievous loss to this country in world markets. What are the Government going to do about it?

Asked by
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 July 2016
Reference
773 c1887
House
House of Lords

To deny those who came here at the turn of the century was abhorrent. Later on, before the Second World War, people came here as refugees and they were accepted. Of course, there was a minority of people who denied their status but they were not heard. The compelling voice...

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2016
Reference
769 c1329
House
House of Lords

I speak as a former European Commissioner. It is absolutely essential that we remain in the European Union, expressing our point of view and being able to judge whether something that has been put forward is in our interests. We can say what we like there. To say that we...

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2016
Reference
769 c51
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
22 February 2016
Reference
769 c7
House
House of Lords

For 30 years, I was president of BALPA, and I notice that the union is very well represented in the Committee today. I beg the Minister to think again about the Bill. Every speech that has been made so far has indicated that the Government ought to think again. We...

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2016
Reference
768 cc2013-4
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether, in the light of the World Health Organisation’s analysis in the Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity, they support the proposal of the National Health Service to introduce a sugar tax.

Asked by
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
3 February 2016
Reference
768 cc1791-3
House
House of Lords

The World Health Organization and the NHS, both distinguished bodies, have proclaimed that a sugar tax is desirable, necessary and should be introduced as soon as possible. In that light, do the Government have any plans to revise their previous position and introduce proposals for a sugar tax by no later than April of this year?

Asked by
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 February 2016
Reference
768 c1791
House
House of Lords

The amount of complacency about changes in legal aid is absolutely bewildering. I speak as somebody who, in earlier life, was much involved with criminal legal aid. At the moment, there will be immense difficulties in recruiting young solicitors to do this work. I hold the view that it is...

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2016
Reference
768 c1553
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have to impose a sugar tax on fizzy drinks.

Asked by
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 January 2016
Reference
768 cc270-2
House
House of Lords

If we had a league of government U-turns, this one would surely head the list. Not so long ago, the Prime Minister said that a sugar tax was not worth while. Now, urged on by experts and MPs of all parties, he says that it is not a bad idea. What should we now do? My view is that we should follow the example of Mexico. Why wait for many months when the evidence is very clear? Why do the Government not act immediately?

Asked by
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 January 2016
Reference
768 c270
House
House of Lords

The Minister is fast earning a reputation for escaping entirely from responsibility. Purely for political purposes, the Government have dithered and dithered. Other airports in Europe, as has already been said, thrive while British aviation disappears. Is it not it more important than anything that while the Government adopt their present stance, the country suffers?

Asked by
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2015
Reference
767 c2071
House
House of Lords