Skip to main content

1-20 of 124 results for member:"Lord Denham"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

There is slight unhappiness that the noble Lord, who is probably speaking for longer than the permitted limit, will not stay for the end.

Member
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2014
Reference
754 c1814
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2012
Reference
737 c73
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when on Monday and Tuesday of last week your Lordships debated a Motion not dissimilar from today’s, most noble Lords opened their remarks by saying that in their view this House badly needed a reform, but not that one. Much the same could be said about today. I...

Member
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2012
Reference
737 c88
House
House of Lords

My Lords, having been a Member of your Lordships’ House for an inordinate length of time, I have often had it said to me that I must have seen a lot of changes in the House over the years. I always give the same reply, that what amazes me is...

Member
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2010
Reference
719 c1684-5
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chairman of Committees whether he will place in the Library of the House the agendas of Procedure Committee meetings to ensure that non-members of the committee have an opportunity to make their views known to members in advance of meetings.

Asked by
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
3144; 718 c350WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am going to limit what I say to Part 5 of the Bill, "The House of Lords", and, of that, only Section 67 which deals with the elected hereditary Peers and their replacement. Having looked at that part of the Bill itself, I then took up the...

Member
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c990-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the negotiations went on throughout the course of the Bill. I was around at the time. I am so sorry; the noble Lord, Lord Steel, may wish to confuse himself like this, but it just simply is not true. This was an honourable meeting between parties to try...

Member
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c991-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, would the noble Baroness really be prepared to see the agreement broken between the Government and the Opposition on hereditary Peers?

Member
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1027
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Lord leaves Part 5, I believed that the whole package offered by the Government to hereditary Peers would be honoured until the final and definitive stage of reform had taken place. Where did I go wrong?

Member
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1051
House
House of Lords

The whole point is that this was a promise given by the Government that caused me to vote for getting the Bill through quickly, which I would not otherwise have done. The Government are reneging on that promise. I cannot understand how they can do that.

Member
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1051
House
House of Lords

I am not interested in what the noble Lord, Lord Steel, said. I would like an answer from the Government.

Member
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1051
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness said that she would like to see the elections for hereditary Peers end. She was in on all the agreements and ways the promises were made. Would she really sleep happy in her bed tonight if she let those promises be broken?

Member
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1027
House
House of Lords
My Lords, will the noble Baroness the Leader of the House bear in mind the wise words of the noble Lord, the first Viscount of Falkland: ""If it is not necessary to change, it is necessary not to change"?"
Asked by
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
718 c838
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have been listening to the responses of the noble Lord, Lord West of Spithead, with great interest, but I do not think he has replied to the question put by my noble friend Lady Neville-Jones about releasing documents to the press before they are made available to...

Member
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2009
Reference
709 c580
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is the noble Baroness aware that my Question was partly aimed at noble Lords who ask supplementary questions and who are strictly limited by Standing Order to two points but all too often offend? However, if Ministers, who are not so limited and are only excused from answering more than two points, would stick voluntarily to that limit, questioners themselves would be more selective and therefore shorter.
Asked by
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
10 June 2008
Reference
702 c478
House
House of Lords
Whether she will remind Ministers of the guidance in the Companion to the Standing Orders that they need only answer two points in response to each supplementary oral question, and of the case for keeping supplementary answers short.
Asked by
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
10 June 2008
Reference
702 c478
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the post office in the Central Lobby of the Palace of Westminster is one of those under threat of closure.

Asked by
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 April 2008
Reference
2978; 700 c246WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that the noble Lord the Lord Chairman of Committees will not be misled by the tone of some of the speeches into being unaware of the real feeling of disquiet among many of your Lordships about what has taken place. Decisions have been taken on matters...

Member
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 March 2008
Reference
700 c736
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:How many, and which, regularly funded theatre-based producing companies in the regions were supported by Arts Council England (ACE) in 2007–08; and how many, and which, ACE plans to support, subject to an appeal process, in 2008–09.

Asked by
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 February 2008
Reference
1228; 699 c58-9WA
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the annual subsidy per seat actually sold in the producing theatres funded by Arts Council England in London and the regions, for the last year for which figures are available; and what is the total seat capacity of those theatres.

Asked by
Lord Denham (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 January 2008
Reference
1231; 698 c117WA
House
House of Lords