Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,613 results for member:"Lord Faulks"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, the Minister referred to the removal of foreign national offenders and how that was to be a priority. I am sure that the House welcomes that, but I did not hear an answer to the question from the noble Lord, Lord Wolfson, about the changes in the application...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c575
House
House of Lords

I too support this amendment. I took part in the debate initiated by the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, in January 2020 when it appeared that the then Government were leaning towards adopting the recommendation that now appears from the Sullivan report. All the Back-Bench speakers on that occasion were...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc590-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think we generally agree that our country needs our Armed Forces, including the reserves and the cadets, more than ever. We need to encourage people to join, and we need to look after them when they do. We ask them to risk their lives on our behalf....

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc686-7
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for allowing me to intervene. He is right up to a point, in the sense that it is true that, provided we remain a member of the European convention, there is potentially a remedy if there is considered to be a breach of the convention...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c688
House
House of Lords

May I simply say this one thing? Until we had the Human Rights Act, we were a member of the European convention. We did not initially even have the right to go to Strasbourg. We then allowed those who wanted to bring an action to go to the Strasbourg court,...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c689
House
House of Lords

I promise the Minister that this is the last intervention that I will make. It is to deal with the point made by the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton. Her understanding was that the Government cannot derogate. I understand the Minister’s answer to the noble Baroness, Lady Goldie, that we want...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c689
House
House of Lords

I will give it one more go; it is probably my lack of clarity. Do the Government have the right to derogate at all? That was the issue that was being raised; maybe I have misunderstood it. The Minister’s understandable answer is that the Government have the right to derogate...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c690
House
House of Lords

The Minister referred to the interim custody orders, and how the Bill is going to put beyond doubt the validity of interim custody orders, and the reappraisal and reconfirmation of the Carltona principle. This is a reference to how the first-instance judgment in Dillon was going to allow Gerry Adams...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2026
Reference
856 c295
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in the King’s Speech we were told that the Government are going to pursue a foreign policy

“based on a calm assessment of the national interest”.

The Prime Minister often reassures us that he intends to act in the national interest. I would have thought that went without saying. But...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2026
Reference
856 cc204-5
House
House of Lords

Further to the question from the noble Lord, Lord West, I understand that the amount that Lord Mandelson is to receive is much less than he asked for. The Minister said that that was to save costs. In many cases, there is surely a commercial reason for settling, but, given...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
854 c778
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my name is on the series of amendments that the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, has spoken to, and I will make a few brief comments in support of them. Before I do, I shall make a few observations about Amendment 394. The noble Lord, Lord Davies, has not...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 cc370-2
House
House of Lords

The prosecuting authorities have decided in these cases, for whatever reason, that they think it appropriate to bring a prosecution, to bring the matter before a court where a jury determines what is right. We trust juries—I know that it is a contentious issue at the moment as to what...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c373
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the right to protest is an interesting concept. We all agree, on all sides of the House, that there is a right to protest. But, as with most rights—the right to free speech or the

right to assemble, for example—in English common law it is not part of...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 cc36-7
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Faulks

377: After Clause 142, insert the following new Clause—

“Lawful or reasonable excuse defence for public order offences

(1) This section applies to any offence that makes conduct unlawful unless there is an excuse for it and specifies either that the excuse must be a lawful excuse or that it...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 cc62-116
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this group of amendments was due to be heard last Wednesday. We were sent away just before midnight but reassured that they would be heard first thing on Monday. Well, it is 9.30 pm; I suppose that is first thing.

Amendment 377 is an important amendment, supported by the...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 cc116-7
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all those who took part in this debate. I think the issues have rather narrowed between those who have taken part in it. For the first time during the course of these debates on this issue, we had some drafting points from the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 cc122-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for being a little late into the Chamber; things moved much more rapidly than I think any of us anticipated. I spoke about this issue at some length, I fear, at Second Reading, in setting out what I thought were the difficulties legally in this area....

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 cc1031-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c1087
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Leader referred to a “clear legal mandate” that would be needed by our troops if they were to act in the defensive way in which the Government have said that they may be able to do. I looked at the summary of the Government’s legal advice, which...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 cc1052-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I enter this debate to support the three previous speakers. I declare an interest as the chair of the Independent Press Standards Organisation, which regulates almost all local media. In that capacity, I have had the opportunity to visit a large number of regional newspapers, to talk to...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc140-1GC
House
House of Lords