Skip to main content

1-20 of 339 results for member:"Lord Hogan-Howe"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I shall speak to just two amendments, Amendments 393B and 394. Amendment 393B is the amendment that the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, has introduced about anonymity. Noble Lords will not be surprised to hear that I do not agree with him. However, I shared with him a few...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 cc365-7
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Lord sits down, could he just consider one thing? He made some very strong points. One thing that concerns the officers—although the noble Lord is quite right to identify that there have been relatively few criminal charges over the period—and the reason they are not persuaded by...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 cc357-373
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for giving way. I understand and accept the distinction that she makes. Over the past 20 or 30 years, the concern for the police officers involved is that, on every occasion that the decision has been made, it has been wrong so far as the jury...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c378
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 385, moved by the noble Lord, Lord Jackson, and Amendment 386 from the noble Lord, Lord Bailey. On Amendment 385, masks on cyclists are a difficult area. We all know that cyclists wear masks for reasons of keeping their mouth warm when it...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have added my name to this amendment, which the noble Lord, Lord Davies, set out the case for very well. It is linked particularly to the Chris Kaba case.

I will try to address the points made by the noble Viscount, Lord Hailsham. He made a fair point....

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 cc327-335
House
House of Lords

I am not going to try to argue the case; I am making my argument, and the noble Viscount is making his. The other regulatory bodies do not have something called the IOPC, a body that is charged with investigating this type of thing. That is fine, but it imposes...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 cc329-336
House
House of Lords

May I address that simple point? To be clear, in these cases, the IOPC is the investigating body. It is in full possession of the information it has gained—interviews, evidence from the scene, et cetera—so it is in a good position to query criminal charge or, at that stage, query...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c338
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise mainly to support the Government. It seems to me that they are broadly taking steps to stop intimidation of the public, not to stop intimidation of the Government, which is what those who support the right to protest seem to be suggesting. The amendments, on the...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c40
House
House of Lords

By that time they will already be in a cell, facing the fact that they have been arrested. It is best to avoid that prospect and the dispute you might end up in with a crowd when having to make that decision. The police need as smooth a transition as...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 cc40-1
House
House of Lords

I avoided having that conversation, because it is a good point. I introduced my points by saying that if a decision is made to impose a ban on masks, a reasonable excuse may be difficult to enforce. I am not expressing an opinion on the noble Lord’s very good point...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c41
House
House of Lords

I will finish here because this is Report, but 50 metres is too short, although I think vicinity works. I agree with the noble Baroness on clarity; I am not against that, but you have to leave the police some flexibility given the circumstances they face. I do not think...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c41
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have added my name to Amendment 371A from the noble Lord, Lord Walney, because it addresses a difficult area—something that falls short of terrorism and which causes problems for legislators, policing and the courts. Terrorism is fairly well understood. It is the application or the threat of...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c75
House
House of Lords

That is quite right, and thank you for that correction, although, clearly, they were not found guilty.

Secondly, the civil case is about prohibition. The High Court has decided that it does not prefer the Government’s judgment that Palestine Action should

be a proscribed group. I find that constitutionally quite odd. I...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 cc75-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have added my name to my noble friend Lord Faulks’ amendment and I support it. To repeat a point I made on an earlier amendment, the police generally need simplicity, not complexity. Generally, Ziegler created complexity in what, in that case, was the simplest of offences. It...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 cc117-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not support the amendment. The noble Lord, Lord Pannick, made the point that there will obviously be regulations, because people do have fears about accessing the DVLA database.

At the moment, the only database that facial comparisons are made against is that of suspects, which is a...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 cc133-4
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Hogan-Howe

326: Clause 121, page 167, line 16, after “both”, insert “and up to 12 points on any relevant driver’s licence”

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 c1291
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I listened carefully to what the Minister said. The noble Lord, Lord Russell, is quite right that there is a need for a joined-up response, but I did not hear it. It is a fair challenge to the people who are opposing the Government to get their act...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 c1291
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak to the amendments I propose. There are three sets affecting two themes. Amendment 343 is about the registration scheme for cyclists, and the two other groups—Amendments 326 to 328, and Amendments 330 to 332—are about creating a system to award points for offences committed...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 cc1272-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have added my name to this amendment because it is trying to achieve consistency in law. At the moment, the law protects a retail worker more, when in fact those who provide services are doing exactly the same thing. Broadly, they deal with the public and they...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 cc1365-1348
House
House of Lords

May I check whether my assertion is accurate or whether I am wrong? Would someone enforcing an age limit in a betting office not

be protected by the retail workers’ protection but someone enforcing an age restriction in an off-licence would be? It seems to me that the distinction is...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 c1368
House
House of Lords