Skip to main content

1-20 of 102 results for member:"Lord Kirkhill"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I rise with considerable pleasure to thank the noble Earl, Lord Dundee, for introducing this debate. We do not talk about the Council of Europe often enough in this Chamber. Indeed, we do not talk about external organisations often enough. The debate gives us an opportunity to say...

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 cc339-340
House
House of Lords

My Lady Chairman—is that the correct form of address?

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2012
Reference
740 c41GC
House
House of Lords

I fully accept that definitive assessment.

My view is that Defra has been playing around with this for many a long day without real purpose. It is clear that primary legislation is required to ban the use of wild animals in circuses. What we are told—and one has to accept it...

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2012
Reference
740 cc41-2GC
House
House of Lords

My goodness me. Given my noble friend’s advanced age, he gets up on his feet rather more quickly than I do. I must admit that the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth of Drumlean, stopped me in the Corridor the other day and said, “Lord Gilbert, that is a splendid contribution you...

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2012
Reference
740 c42GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join other noble Lords in congratulating the noble and learned Lord, Lord Irvine of Lairg, on securing this debate. Nowadays, when we discuss fundamental rights, we inevitably have to talk about the European Convention on Human Rights. This convention is by no means the only international instrument...

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2011
Reference
727 c1522-4
House
House of Lords

Deputy Chairman, it might be convenient for the Minister if I very briefly intervened to make a few remarks.

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2009
Reference
711 c467GC
House
House of Lords

Thank you. It is the arthritis of old age. These are the problems that occur if you live long enough. I declare an interest in that many decades ago I was a Dunfermline Building Society manager. I do not intend to repeat the few remarks which I made in the...

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2009
Reference
711 c467GC
House
House of Lords

Why? I have a gammy leg at the moment, if you don’t mind.

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2009
Reference
711 c467GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on a point of clarification, I did not quite understand why those members of the pension scheme might have a preference ahead of others. Can the Minister briefly develop that point for me?

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c629
House
House of Lords

My Lords, unashamedly using the order, I want to say a few words at this stage about the Dunfermline Building Society. I declare an interest in that for a number of years I was its Aberdeen manager 30-odd years ago. The Dunfermline Building Society is not, and was not, Scotland’s...

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c617-8
House
House of Lords
My Lords, will the Minister confirm that when he mentions NHS Direct, that includes NHS 24 in Scotland?
Asked by
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 April 2009
Reference
710 c219
House
House of Lords

Before my noble friend responds, I wonder whether the Committee agrees that fewer interventions from the noble Lord, Lord Lester of Herne Hill, might be more beneficial to the rest of us in Committee in trying to assess the Minister’s reply. We cannot get past the opening remarks from the...

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2008
Reference
704 c1082
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I put it to the Minister that my noble friend Lord Foulkes is correct in emphasising that the Government are interpreting a piece of EU legislation in a certain way. Other countries do not always take that stance. The outcome is certainly deleterious to the United Kingdom’s smaller football clubs.
Asked by
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
22 January 2007
Reference
688 c896
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendment, as I indicated on previous occasions. The emphasis is correct in that there should be an opt-in; that seems to me to be a straightforward way of implementing this sort of regulation. Given that the second working group no longer exists, the Minister might...

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c316-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendment tabled by the noble Baroness, Lady Byford. She is right to raise the issue today. She is correct also in suggesting that this clause should be in the Bill. Despite what the noble Lord, Lord Lipsey, said, it is clear that self-regulation is not...

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2006
Reference
685 c1027
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the noble Baroness and agree with all her remarks. As I said more than once in Committee, I am a prohibitionist. I think—and there is some evidence to show that my thoughts are right—that travelling circuses train animals cruelly, at least initially. When moving about the...

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2006
Reference
685 c1001
House
House of Lords

The Duke of Montrose and Lord Kirkhill agree with that remark.

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2006
Reference
683 c27GC
House
House of Lords

I very much support the amendment. I am conscious of the fact that my noble friend Lord Lipsey has made significant improvement. But the information that I receive from time to time suggests that the welfare of retired greyhounds, in particular, is entirely inadequate. There are a lot of ruthless owners and ruthless disposals...

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2006
Reference
682 c224GC
House
House of Lords

I apologise for interrupting but I wondered whether I might crave the indulgence of the Committee for a moment. Yesterday, I averred that I had said in a phrase ““circus animal trainer”” and I held to that. The noble Earl, Lord Peel, pointed out to me that I had not used the word ““circus”” before ““animal trainer””....

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2006
Reference
682 c201GC
House
House of Lords

A circus trainer—that was my statement. Every circus trainer has admitted in his autobiography that he has trained animals using cruel methods. It is on the record.

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2006
Reference
682 c178GC
House
House of Lords