Skip to main content

1-20 of 387 results for member:"Lord Lemos"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Honourable Friend, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Sentencing, Human Rights and Technology (Jake Richards MP) has today made the following statement:

"In April 2025, the then Lord Chancellor announced the authorisation of PAVA spray for use by a specially trained and selected group of staff in the three public...

Member
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
HLWS316
House
House of Lords

The Government recognise the critical role litigation funding plays in supporting access to justice and the need for such arrangements to be fair, transparent and commercially viable for funders. To support these aims, the Government have accepted the Civil Justice Council’s two key recommendations. First, we will legislate to mitigate the effects of the PACCAR judgment. Secondly, we will introduce proportionate regulation of litigation funding agreements. We will implement these changes when parliamentary time allows.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c233
House
House of Lords

We are committed to legislating. I hear the noble Lord’s concern about that, but I want to reassure the House that we are committed to legislating when parliamentary time allows. We are working urgently to identify a new legislative vehicle to take this forward. Legislation will clarify that litigation funding agreements are not damages-based agreements, and this will mitigate the effects of the PACCAR judgment.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c234
House
House of Lords

I do recognise that, and I know the history of Sir Alan Bates’ involvement in this. Sir Alan Bates has spoken openly about how, without a litigation funding agreement, he and the sub-postmasters would not have had their day in court. We agree with Sir Alan that third-party funding is crucial for enabling ordinary people to access justice. The access to justice point is the centre of why we think this is important, and I know that is what noble Lords feel too. With group and consumer claims, third-party funding under a litigation funding agreement is often the only option people have to bring a claim. I note the comments of the noble Lord, Lord Carlile, about access to legal aid as well. I want to reassure the noble Lord, Lord Arbuthnot, that we understand the importance of it in relation to the sub-postmasters and to Sir Alan Bates.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c234
House
House of Lords

That is why we think light-touch regulation is important here. Transparency is important for consumers in these situations. I see the noble Baroness smile. I know the phrase “light touch” receives a hollow laugh—I used to be a financial services regulator myself. The Government do feel that there is a need to get this on to a proper regulatory footing. I can say a lot more about this; I promise not to be boring. I suspect a lot of the questions I am going to be asked are about urgency and getting on with it. As well as what I have said about finding the appropriate

legislative vehicle, I will go back to Minister Sackman to have a discussion about this. As the noble Baroness knows, I have had rather a busy week. It is above my pay grade to give a commitment, but I will press the case. If I get anywhere, I will buy the noble Lord, Lord Carlile, a cup of tea, and if he likes the answer, he can buy me a glass of champagne.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c234
House
House of Lords

Bottomless quicksands are best avoided. I know the history of all this and the legislation the previous Government proposed. As I have made clear, we will legislate. The noble and learned Lord knows I cannot give him a date, but I will do my best to move this forward with Minister Sackman.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c235
House
House of Lords

Yes, I do. I can tell the noble and learned Baroness what is holding this up: it is people like me and other Ministers competing for legislative time. I am sorry to say I am going to be arguing with myself, but I promise to take noble Lords’ side on this. I understand the issues about access to justice. I take them very seriously and I will do my best.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c235
House
House of Lords

No, it is not being blocked by the Treasury. Sorry, I must not be too bold and assertive—I appreciate that that is not my role. But no, it is not blocked by the Treasury. The Treasury has no say in this. We are looking for an appropriate legislative vehicle. The noble Lord, Lord Wilson, told me last night at dinner that it is more fun if I am rambunctious at the Dispatch Box.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c235
House
House of Lords

I almost always agree with my noble friend, but on this occasion, I would suggest a tentative correction. Actually, the previous Government did put forward legislation, as the noble and learned Lord, Lord Keen, mentioned. But we are committed to doing that, and as my noble friend says, there are some competitive pressures. I know something about competition for legislation. I know a lot less about competition law, but I am learning fast.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c236
House
House of Lords

My Right Honourable Friend the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (Rt Hon Alex Norris MP) has made the following statement:

"This Government inherited a prison system on the brink of collapse. In July 2024, men’s prisons were operating at 99 percent capacity. At one point, there were fewer...

Member
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
HLWS309
House
House of Lords

Lords second reading. Agreed to on question. Lords motion that the bill be committed to a Committee of the Whole House and instruction on order of clauses to be taken. Amendment to the motion debated and withdrawn. Original motion agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Lemos
Answering member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 cc26-116
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope all noble Lords had a good break over the summer. As your Lordships might perhaps have noticed, we have been beavering away at the Ministry of Justice. If you get a call from No. 10, as I did on the last day before Recess, be careful...

Member
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 cc26-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for participating in this debate today. I think all noble Lords will agree with me that it has been an immensely powerful debate, with a deep sense of reflection and consideration, and I greatly welcome the sense of consensus and collaboration that has...

Member
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 cc108-114
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Lemos

Member
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 c114
House
House of Lords

I beg to move.

Amendment to the Motion

Member
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 c114
House
House of Lords

My Lords, you are not quite done with me yet. This is quite an unusual Motion and, as I understand it, it is about not only this Bill but the general scrutiny of legislation in the House of Commons. The entirety of the Bill was considered in a Commons Public...

Member
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 cc115-6
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the risks to public safety arising from the early release of prisoners, including registered sex offenders, under the current early release scheme.

Asked by
Baroness Sugg (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 August 2026
Reference
HL2601
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the risks to public safety arising from the early release of prisoners, including registered sex offenders, under the current early release scheme.

Asked by
Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 August 2026
Reference
HL2710
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of changes to jury trials proposed in the Courts and Tribunals Bill on the Crown Court backlog.

Asked by
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 August 2026
Reference
HL2538
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government when they intend to make further progress with the Courts and Tribunals Bill.

Asked by
Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 August 2026
Reference
HL2714
House
House of Lords