Skip to main content

1-20 of 73 results for member:"Lord Methuen"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Is the Minister aware that, due to the inefficiency of the Stortext system used by the Treasury Solicitor’s Department to pay its accounts with firms such as costs lawyers, some of these small firms have outstanding accounts going back to May? This compares unfavourably with HMRC, which pays its accounts with minimum delay.

Asked by
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 2013
Reference
750 c1257
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether the Treasury Solicitor's Office is paying its small suppliers within the time recommended by Government guidelines; and, if not, why not.[HL2619]

Asked by
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 October 2013
Reference
HL2619; 748 c204WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as chairman of the trustees of an almshouse trust, we have been considering going the alternative way of incorporation. We welcome the measures and shall be examining them at our meeting on 7 December. We think that this is a much better way to go than the current...

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2012
Reference
741 c81GC
House
House of Lords

Is the Minister aware that Rolls-Royce, in order to fund its suppliers, has lent them £500 million, because the banks are not doing so?

Asked by
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 2012
Reference
740 c400
House
House of Lords

On what basis is the Committee Office funded and why, with this huge influx of new Members, could more resources not be given to it to enable these additional committees and the existing ones to be adequately funded?

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2012
Reference
736 c1182
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think it may be appropriate that I speak to my amendment at this stage. In so doing, I declare my interests as a member of the British Group of the IPU, although I have not attended any of its delegations, and as a participant in the Lord...

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2010
Reference
720 c928-9
House
House of Lords

As an amendment to the above Motion, at end to insert ““but with the addition of the following words at the end of the first sentence in paragraph 22- ““whether or not the House is sitting.””, and with the omission of the words ““(if the House is sitting)”” in the...

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2010
Reference
720 c946
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Krebs, for initiating this debate and for his excellent chairmanship of the sub-committee. I also thank our secretariat and special adviser for all they did to support us in producing the report. It was a very interesting inquiry exploring a highly innovative...

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2010
Reference
720 c665-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome this debate, introduced by the noble Lord, Lord Broers, on the Science and Technology Committee’s original and follow-up reports on internet security and the Government’s responses to these reports. I, too, am disappointed by the generally unenthusiastic response of the Government to the initial report and...

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 October 2008
Reference
704 c471-3
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:What progress has been made in determining the cause of the crash landing of British Airways Boeing 777 aircraft G-YMMM at Heathrow Airport on 17 January.

Asked by
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 May 2008
Reference
3344; 701 c82-3WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, can the Minister be categoric as to whether the Reading terminus is being seriously considered, or is it merely pie in the sky?

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2008
Reference
697 c933
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the Crossrail Bill for the benefits that it will bring to all parts of the metropolis and its businesses. However, I am disappointed that the more ambitions Superlink scheme did not find favour with the promoters, as I think that in the longer term it would...

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2008
Reference
697 c920
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I had the pleasure of serving under the chairmanship of the noble Lord, Lord Harrison, on these two Bills. It is the second time that I have served on such a committee. Last year, I served on the Select Committee which looked at the Leicester, Maidstone and Liverpool...

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2007
Reference
696 c1395
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome this debate drawing attention to the growth in passenger and freight traffic, and I look forward to hearing more about the Government’s paper, Delivering a Sustainable Railway. I am particularly interested in the proposed infrastructure changes at Reading and Birmingham. It is interesting to note that...

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2007
Reference
696 c1365-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister agree that Crossrail would be much more effective if it was extended as I suggested?

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2007
Reference
696 c1383
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank the noble Lord, Lord Renton, for introducing this debate on the report. I served on the previous Information Committee as well as on this one. The joint meetings between the Information Committee and the Commons Administration Committee entailed a lot of work. In fact, the...

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
695 c684-6
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether, if the proposed road pricing schemes for the cities of Leicester, Nottingham and Derby are authorised, they will ensure that the planned Kegworth Parkway railway station serving the above cities on the Midland main line route from the east Midlands to London is built and operational...

Asked by
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 June 2007
Reference
4280; 693 c45WA
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is the Minister aware that Staffordshire County Council intends to shut all its council-run homes? Do the Government support this move?
Asked by
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 March 2007
Reference
690 c320-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome this debate on the report the Merits Committee on the management of secondary legislation, produced under the guidance of our chairman, the noble Lord, Lord Filkin. I came on to the committee at its inception in 2003, not knowing precisely what I had let myself in...

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2006
Reference
687 c815-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is the Minister aware of a 1930s scheme called the grand contour canal, which I think was at the 600-foot contour? It was devised to take water all around England, providing both water distribution and navigation—or recreation, in this day and age. It would have covered the entire country to...

Member
Lord Methuen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2006
Reference
682 c281
House
House of Lords