Skip to main content

1-20 of 327 results for member:"Lord Roper"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

How will the results of the intergovernmental panel affect the position that the Government and their European Union partners are developing for next year’s framework convention conference in Paris?

Asked by
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 April 2014
Reference
753 c1035
House
House of Lords

My Lords, like the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig, I want merely to express my gratitude to my noble friend the Minister for having brought forward an amendment which, as he explained, goes somewhat further than the amendment we considered on Report. Like others who have been involved in...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 April 2014
Reference
753 c965
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in view of the remarks made by my noble friend the Minister in his intervention in the speech of the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig, saying that he intends to accept the principle of Amendment 9, I can be a good deal briefer than I would otherwise...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2014
Reference
753 cc556-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, from these Benches, I add our condolences to the family of the soldier of 22 Engineer Regiment who died yesterday.

The matter of the Statement is obviously serious and the Government have been absolutely right to act in accord with the precautionary principle. I wonder whether my noble friend...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2014
Reference
752 cc1534-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, was surprised to read these words. I had looked in the draft regulations to see whether there is anything within them which would help us. There is not. There is a reference to allowable costs in paragraphs 13 to 15, but that merely refers us back...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2014
Reference
752 c350GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the Government’s amendments to these various clauses. They are a very full response to the report of our Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee of last December, which was responded to by the noble Lord, Lord Astor, in his letter to the committee published earlier this...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2014
Reference
752 c364GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak briefly to this group of amendments but my remarks apply also to a later group. Comments made on this issue will, inevitably, cross from one group to the other.

Many of us have benefited from the advice which the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Drones received from...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2014
Reference
752 cc86-7GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I might just ask the noble and gallant Lord one question. In the report by Ben Emmerson that I quoted there is a reference to the way the United Kingdom considers targeting intelligence. It says:

“The United Kingdom has informed the Special Rapporteur that during its operations in Afghanistan targeting...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2014
Reference
752 c90GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for omitting to thank my noble friend Lord Hodgson for these interesting amendments and my noble friend Lady Miller, and the noble Baroness, Lady Stern, for their contributions. I turn to a point made by my noble friend Lord Hodgson in moving the amendment when he...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2014
Reference
752 c113GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for that intervention. He is, of course, a very old friend. However, I feel that the Minister and the noble Lord, Lord Dannatt, in their interventions in the earlier debate, made it absolutely clear that there was no question of any American remotely...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2014
Reference
752 c115GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is obviously right about that. I was really treating the somewhat narrower point on the earlier amendment which we had been considering rather than the wider range of activities which could take place and which was very much discussed when we were looking at the question of...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2014
Reference
752 c116GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I believe we should give consideration to Part 1 at this time, and that it should remain in the Bill. I am therefore unable to support the suggestions by the noble Lord, Lord Rosser, that these clauses do not stand part of the Bill. His points about the...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
752 c15GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would be grateful if my noble friend in replying to this debate could give us more information on why Clause 2 is necessary and what sort of financial assistance we are discussing here.

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
752 c35GC
House
House of Lords

Before my noble friend sits down, could he explain—I thought I understood this but now understand it less—whether the reference in Clause 2 to “a contractor” is to the GOCO contractor or to an individual company that is supplying goods to the Ministry of Defence? That is not totally clear.

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
752 c37GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in many cases, they have been in schedules to proposals for referendums. This time, they will merely come back as a statutory instrument, which this House will have no chance of amending unless a subsequent amendment to the Bill is accepted.

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2014
Reference
751 c1521
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Roper

9: Clause 1, page 1, line 3, at end insert—

“( ) The holding of a referendum under subsection (1) is subject to the condition set out in section (referendum condition) below being met.”

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2014
Reference
751 c894
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 9 is included in the group we are discussing, along with Amendment 74, and is not part of the second group headed by Amendment 2 as it appears in the groupings list, because Amendment 2 was pre-empted by your Lordships’ decision on the previous amendment.

Amendment 9, together...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2014
Reference
751 cc894-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord is right. We will come to his amendments with their new numbers, which I think are 42A and 43A. I was going to refer to them a little later—Amendments 5, 6 and 7, like my Amendment 2, having been pre-empted. Those amendments refer to reports...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2014
Reference
751 cc895-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am extraordinarily grateful for the support from all parts of the House for this cross-party Back-Bench amendment asking for the Bill to include an obligation to provide objective information on these critical matters. Given the time, I hope noble Lords will forgive me if I do not...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2014
Reference
751 c910
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I can help the House. This morning, when we carried Amendment 1, Amendments 2 to 7 were pre-empted on the same basis, because they would have been introduced into the Bill at the place where subsection (1) was previously. The same thing has now occurred because of...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2014
Reference
751 c953
House
House of Lords