Skip to main content

1-20 of 314 results for member:"Lord Strasburger"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government on which dates in the past two years they have met representatives of (1) Stubhub, or (2) Viagogo; for each such meeting who represented the Government; and for each such meeting what was discussed.

Asked by
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
HL1121
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her reply. Over the last year, Government Ministers have repeatedly told this House that all service providers must get on with implementing last year’s Supreme Court ruling, but it seems that the NHS did not get the memo. The cases of Sandie Peggie and the Darlington

nurses show that the NHS still expects female nurses to undress in front of males. Will the new Health Secretary be any better than the previous one at getting the NHS to obey the law?

Asked by
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 June 2026
Reference
856 c630
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government which government departments have not yet fully implemented the Supreme Court judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers.

Asked by
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
1 June 2026
Reference
856 cc630-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will address the impact of Brexit on one of our largest economic sectors—the creative arts sector—and reflect on what that impact tells us about the direction of our economy and the changing mood of the country. In the years since Brexit, not only has our cultural life...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2026
Reference
856 cc89-91
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his reply. A quarter of all women have experienced male violence at least once in their lives. That is one reason why biological males are excluded from women’s safe spaces—except, that is, in government. For more than a year, the Government have failed women by not restoring their single-sex spaces. The Empire State Building was built in a year and 45 days, but that does not seem to be enough time for the Government to sort out some toilets. Either the Government do not really care about the safety of women and girls or they are just incompetent. Which is it?

Asked by
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
855 c931
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government when they intend to implement the Supreme Court judgement in the For Women Scotland case within Government departments to ensure full compliance with the law.

Asked by
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
855 cc931-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have prepared a full speech on three amendments in this group and the Government’s behaviour regarding the proscription of Palestine Action. I have signed Amendments 420, 422A and 422B, which, if agreed, would prevent the naked politicisation of terrorist legislation ever happening again. However, I recognise that...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c906
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was going to speak on Amendments 400 and 407 in this group, but my noble friend Lady Doocey made such an excellent contribution that I will skip my speech on Amendment 400. I want to say, though, that I am not quite sure what the point is...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 cc391-2
House
House of Lords

Thank you. Amendment 407 asks us to make a practical decision about policing and tackling violence against women and girls. It is not—I repeat, not—about taking sides in a culture war. Recording biological sex in every case is about getting the basics right: honest crime figures, sound operational decisions and...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 cc388-393
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak to Amendment 369A in my name, which we have just been discussing, and to Amendments 372A, 372B, 372C and 373, to all of which I have added my name. Regarding Amendment 369A, Clause 133 seeks to create a new offence of concealed identity at...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 cc25-30
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Strasburger

369A: Clause 133, page 176, line 10, leave out subsection (2) and insert—

“(2) It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to show that they had a reasonable excuse for wearing or otherwise using the item at the material time.”

Member's explanatory statement

This...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c52
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who contributed to this very thoughtful debate. I point out that Clause 133 already contains three reasonable excuses for the offence, but I do not understand why it contains those three and no others. For example, we have not had a convincing explanation...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c52
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are talking today about live facial recognition at protests and why the police must not be allowed to use it until Parliament has agreed a clear and democratic code of practice. At its heart, Amendment 374 is about power and trust. Live facial recognition is not just...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 cc104-5
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, could he give the House some indication of when the day will come when we have a debate on some meaningful proposals? Could he also tell the House whether those proposals will cover the use of this technology by the private sector—which is happening a...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c109
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the DVLA driver database must not be turned into a ready-made line-up for facial recognition systems. This is about more than data protection; it is about the basic relationship between citizen and state. People did not hand over their photographs to the DVLA so that the Government could...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 cc78-133
House
House of Lords

My Lords, given the hour I do not want to detain the House for much longer. In fact, I have deleted the first page of my speech accordingly, and I will address the comments of the noble Baroness, Lady Lawrence, in a moment.

First, this amendment insists that all future incident...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 cc151-121
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government with which organisations they are consulting regarding the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s Code of Practice for Services, Public Functions and Associations.

Asked by
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 2026
Reference
853 cc736-9
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his reply. By law, the Secretary of State has only two choices: to either lay the code before Parliament or send it back to the EHRC. She has dithered for five months over this binary decision about 11 pages that are at issue. If kicking the can down the road were an Olympic sport, this Government would be favourite for the gold medal. But this is serious: thousands of organisations are desperately waiting for the code of practice to make sure that they comply with the law. When will they get it?

Asked by
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 2026
Reference
853 c737
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they consider any specific issues relating to who can lawfully access women's single-sex facilities to be open to interpretation, and if so which issues.

Asked by
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 February 2026
Reference
HL13766
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Baroness Smith of Malvern on 19 January (HL Deb col 5), what steps they expect public and private bodies to take to review their policies in line with the For Women Scotland Supreme Court judgement before the publication of the updated Code...

Asked by
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 February 2026
Reference
HL13767
House
House of Lords