Skip to main content

1-20 of 825 results for member:"Lord Timpson"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords question for short debate on what assessment they have made of the effectiveness of partnership working between prisons and local housing authorities in preventing homelessness and rough sleeping among prisoners released early.

Lead member
Lord Farmer
Answering member
Lord Timpson
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
858 cc731-751
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by thanking the noble Lord, Lord Farmer, for his Question, and for the opportunity to discuss these critical issues that are close to his and all our hearts. The noble Lord has long argued that, if people are to leave crime behind, we must make sure...

Member
Lord Timpson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
858 cc748-751
House
House of Lords

In the two years since being in government, we have made significant progress to support IPP prisoners. We have reduced the number of never-released IPP prisoners by 21% and the number of IPP offenders in the community by 70%. IPP recalls fell by 31% in 2025 compared to 2024, and we have also changed the law through the Sentencing Act. Around 100 IPP offenders became eligible for earlier licence termination when these changes were implemented on 1 June.

Answered by
Lord Timpson (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
858 c692
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness will not be surprised that everybody I meet in prisons and probation, and around the whole justice sector, is ambitious for IPP prisoners. We are committed to ensuring that they get the support they need to progress. I am still ambitious, so that is why we are supporting the hardest to reach, especially IPP prisoners, those who we know are really stuck in the system. We are trialling a new IPP advocate role and giving IPP prisoners more experiences so they can progress, with specialists working with them, and when they go to approved premises, they are staying there longer and have more support. All these initiatives will help, but we need to remain ambitious, because I know, as many of us do, that IPP prisoners can get through. Having employed many of them myself, I believe in second chances and that they can get through.

Answered by
Lord Timpson (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
858 c692
House
House of Lords

It is possible that some of these offenders may have been given a discretionary life sentence and therefore would still be subject to the parole process and therefore still in prison if they had not the met the statutory release test. It is also possible that some of these offenders may have been given standard determinate sentences and therefore could have been released by now. However, all IPP offenders are subject to review by the independent Parole Board, which has, in some cases repeatedly, found them unsafe to be released.

Answered by
Lord Timpson (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
858 c693
House
House of Lords

The noble and learned Lord is incorrect: 896 IPP prisoners have never been released; that is 11% down on last year. My view is that we need to get them into the right prison. Two years ago, only 70% of them were in the right prison; now 91% are in the right prison, and we need to support them so they can get out. Prisons like HMP Grendon, which is a therapeutic community, do good work with IPP prisoners, and HMP Warren Hill has specialist units to support them. I want them to progress as quickly as possible but as safely as possible, so when they are out, they can stay out and do so safely.

Answered by
Lord Timpson (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
858 c693
House
House of Lords

I am glad the noble Baroness thinks that the new Prime Minister will be perfect. I was pleased to see the noble Baroness yesterday outside the Ministry of Justice with a number of ex-IPP prisoners and their families. I reiterate the

important role that families play in the justice system. There are 193,000 children affected by parental imprisonment and a number of those are children whose parents are on IPP sentences. Some have come home and are then recalled back into custody. One of the key elements for people reforming and not reoffending is family ties. Yes, they need a job and somewhere safe to live, and we want them to be well, but families have a really important role, which is why we need to keep supporting the families of IPP prisoners.

Answered by
Lord Timpson (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
858 c693
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for his kind words, and I look forward to seeing a number of noble Lords at the IPP Peers meeting on Monday. I will take away the point on the progression board that he mentions. However, I reiterate that we need prisons that work and a Probation Service that works. One of the things that I been focused on is performance in the justice system. I am pleased to inform Members of your Lordships’ House that 70% of our prisons and 90% of our probation regions are now performing better than they were. Self-harm and assaults on staff are down. To me, all that shows that we are getting to the right place, which will make it easier for often complex prisoners to get on so they can get out and stay out.

Answered by
Lord Timpson (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
858 c694
House
House of Lords

The last IPP prisoner I met was in HMP Birmingham—I think I was there three weeks ago. He was back on recall and facing further charges. The nature of the conversation was quite troubling, because I learned from him that he felt safer in prison than in the community. Also, he did not think that open prisons were always that good for long-term complex prisoners, which surprised me because I am a big fan of open prisons, having recruited lots of people from them. I went away with the challenge of how we ensure that IPP prisoners, when they go to open conditions, are not brought back. Too many go there quite quickly and then come back.

Answered by
Lord Timpson (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
858 c694
House
House of Lords

The noble and learned Lord is right to bring this up because they are often the most complex individuals in our whole prison estate. The level of self-harm among this cohort can be pretty terrifying. There are a significant number of IPP prisoners in secure mental health hospitals, and that is the right place for them. However, we need to ensure that we have them in the right prison. As I mentioned, HMP Grendon and HMP Warren Hill are therapeutically informed environments, and the Phoenix wing we are starting next month in HMP Aylesbury is a specialist wing where we are trying things we have never tried before. The people we call our “red rated” are those who are the furthest away from release and they are often the most challenging IPP prisoners. We need to get progression support around them and give them hope, because we need them to believe that they can get out—too many times they have seen people go to progression panels and not get out. We need to make sure we do what we can to give them hope.

Answered by
Lord Timpson (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
858 c695
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to address the continued detention of individuals serving Imprisonment for Public Protection sentences beyond their original tariff periods.

Asked by
Baroness Ludford (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
858 cc692-5
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government in how many of the prisons located in Wales are inmates provided with facilities to play or study the game of chess.

Asked by
Lord Wigley (Plaid Cymru)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
HL1866
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government how many women have ceased to hold their existing roles as a result of changes to vetting requirements introduced through the prison service instruction and probation service instruction Security Vetting: PSI 07/2014, PI 03/2014, in each year since its implementation.

Asked by
Bishop of Gloucester (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
HL1805
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they conducted an Equality Impact Assessment of the prison service instruction and probation service instruction Security Vetting: PSI 07/2014, PI 03/2014 for (1) prisons, (2) HM Prison and Probation Service, and (3) providers of probation services.

Asked by
Bishop of Gloucester (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
HL1801
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have conducted an Equality Impact Assessment of the prison service instruction and probation service instruction Security Vetting: PSI 07/2014, PI 03/2014; what assessment was made of the impact of the framework on women; and what conclusions were reached.

Asked by
Bishop of Gloucester (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
HL1802
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they made, during the development of the prison service instruction and probation service instruction Security Vetting: PSI 07/2014, PI 03/2014, of the potential impact on individuals already employed by (1) prisons, (2) HM Prison and Probation Service, and (3) providers of probation services.

Asked by
Bishop of Gloucester (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
HL1803
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government how many women employed by organisations providing services to probation under contract have been refused vetting clearance under the prison service instruction and probation service instruction Security Vetting: PSI 07/2014, PI 03/2014.

Asked by
Bishop of Gloucester (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
HL1804
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether victims of serious medical malpractice resulting in convictions for wounding with intent have the same statutory rights to make representations to the Parole Board as victims of violent crime; and if not, whether they have any plans to extend such rights to these victims.

Asked by
Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 2026
Reference
HL1433
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that victims of Ian Paterson are formally notified of, and given the opportunity to make representations regarding, any decisions relating to his early release or change of custodial category.

Asked by
Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 2026
Reference
HL1434
House
House of Lords

Today, I am laying before Parliament the HMPPS 2025/26 Annual Report on the IPP Sentence, pursuant to Section 67 of the Victims and Prisoners Act 2024.

This Report sets out the activity across HMPPS for the financial year of 2025/26 to support those serving the IPP sentence in prison to work...

Member
Lord Timpson (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
HLWS208
House
House of Lords