Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,095 results for member:"Natascha Engel"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I must draw the House’s attention to the fact that financial privilege is engaged by Lords amendments 11 and 33. If the House agrees to them, I will cause an appropriate entry to be made in the Journal.

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
624 c1149
House
House of Commons

With this it will be convenient to consider Lords amendments 2 to 147.

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
624 c1149
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman’s thunder.

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
624 c1137
House
House of Commons

We now come to my favourite piece of parliamentary procedure, so in my last session in the Chair, I am delighted to ask the Whip to move the motion for the Reasons Committee.

Motion made, and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 83H(2)), That a Committee be appointed to draw up...

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
624 c1147
House
House of Commons

I must draw the House’s attention to the fact that financial privilege is engaged by Lords amendments 23, 138 and 139. If agreed by the House, I will cause an appropriate entry to be made in the Journal. I also remind the House that certain of the motions relating to...

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
624 c1158
House
House of Commons

With this it will be convenient to discuss the following:

Government amendments (a) to (d) in lieu of Lords amendment 1.

Lords amendments 2 to 11.

Lords amendment 12, and Government motion to disagree.

Lords amendment 209, and Government motion to disagree.

Lords amendment 210, and Government motion to disagree.

Government amendments (a) to (g) in...

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
624 cc1158-9
House
House of Commons

With the leave of the House, we shall take motions 4 to 11 together.

Motion made, and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 118(6)),

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c219
House
House of Commons

Order. I am sure the hon. Gentleman means the leader of the Labour party, or the right hon. Member for Islington North.

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2017
Reference
624 c956
House
House of Commons

Order. I have a couple of things to say. Interventions are getting extremely long. Members are also referring to each other directly—we do not do that; we speak through the Chair. The whole tone of the debate until now has been very good, and I really do not want that...

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2017
Reference
624 c958
House
House of Commons

Order. We are in danger of ranging far outside the Second Reading of the Bill and getting bogged down into specifics about individual parties. I understand why and where that is coming from, but if we could keep more closely to the Bill, that would be fantastic.

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2017
Reference
624 c962
House
House of Commons

Order. The hon. Gentleman must ask for the leave of the House, as it is the second time he has spoken. I am sure that he will be given it.

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2017
Reference
624 c969
House
House of Commons

If the Minister would like to respond, he is welcome to do so.

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2017
Reference
624 c852
House
House of Commons

If the Minister would like to respond to that, it would be very helpful.

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2017
Reference
624 c852
House
House of Commons

I thank all hon. Members for their points of order, and I thank the hon. Member for Stockton North (Alex Cunningham) for raising this point. It is important, and I am grateful to the Minister for having responded so positively to it. We will leave it there for now.

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2017
Reference
624 c852
House
House of Commons

Order. If Members leaving the Chamber do so a little more quietly, we can hear the Minister. Thank you.

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2017
Reference
624 c732
House
House of Commons

I think the hon. Lady has very successfully done so herself. As she can see, on the Treasury Bench is the Leader of the House, who will, I am sure, take up the matter with her. I thank her for the point of order and for giving me notice of...

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2017
Reference
624 c740
House
House of Commons

The amendment has been selected.

5.10 pm

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2017
Reference
624 c570
House
House of Commons

Order. Before I call the next speaker, I should like to inform Members that if they speak for no more than eight minutes, everyone will get in. That would allow everyone to speak for eight minutes in the next debate as well. So if we could all stick to an...

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2017
Reference
624 c450
House
House of Commons

Thank you. As in the previous debate, if Members stay within an eight-minute limit, everyone will be able to get in and there will be plenty of time for wind-ups. That is not an imposed limit, just guidance for Members.

3.29 pm

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2017
Reference
624 c486
House
House of Commons

May I remind hon. Members that the eight-minute limit does include interventions? If everybody takes this much time, I am afraid that the last Member who wants to speak will not get to do so.

3.41 pm

Member
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2017
Reference
624 c490
House
House of Commons