Skip to main content

1-20 of 3,071 results for member:"Nick Boles"

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (1) + Bills (1) + Public bills (1) + Private members' bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (1)
+ Members' contributions (1,141)
-
Business questions (1)
-
Maiden speeches (1)
-
Oral answers to questions (429)
-
Oral question time interventions (2)
+ Oral questions (115)
-
Prime Minister's questions (12)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Points of order (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (594)
+ Parliamentary committees (42) + Committee proceedings (42)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (20)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (21)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (138) + Debates (101)
-
Adjournment debates (40)
-
Backbench debates (6)
+ Committee proceedings (42)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (20)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (21)
-
e-petition debates (1)
+ Legislative debates (45)
-
Debates on bills (26)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (19)
-
Opposition days (2)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
+ Statements (19) + Oral statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (1)
-
Written statements (18)
-
Urgent questions (2)
+ Written corrections (14)
-
Ministerial corrections (14)
+ Parliamentary questions (1,908)
-
Business questions (1)
+ Oral questions (115)
-
Prime Minister's questions (12)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (2)
-
Written questions (1,790)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Observations on petitions (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That this House calls on the Government, if it is granted a flexible extension to Article 50 by the European Union, to work to a 14-day timetable for passing the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill, and to bring to an immediate end the flexible extension as soon as the Bill...

Primary sponsor
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Early day motions
Date
24 October 2019
Reference
57
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend does not want to answer the question from the right hon. Member for Wantage (Mr Vaizey), so I will. If the Letwin amendment passes, and the Government bring forward the Bill at the start of next week and that Bill passes before 31 October, we will...

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2019
Reference
666 c609
House
House of Commons

It is a great pleasure to ask a question of my old friend the Lord Chancellor. I fear that he may not have received complete information from his officials, because his immediate predecessor did ask for a call for evidence and for No. 10 approval of a call for evidence. It is true that the previous Prime Minister resigned before that request could be approved, but the previous Lord Chancellor did make it clear that he thought a call for evidence was justified. To be clear about the reasons why: it is not that Government are going to take a position on a possible change of law, but only the Government can gather the information about the effect of the current law so that Parliament can decide whether that law needs to be changed.

Asked by
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 c1622
House
House of Commons

Having lost in court, the Attorney General is keen to try his hand at another test—an election. Perhaps I can help him. In paragraph 41 of the unanimous judgment, the Supreme Court refers to

“Two fundamental principles of our constitutional law”,

saying:

“The first is the principle of Parliamentary sovereignty: that laws enacted...

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 September 2019
Reference
664 cc662-3
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c212
House
House of Commons

Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker. I am not sure whether the hon. Member for Stone (Sir William Cash), with his great distinction, is nevertheless blessed with the application called Twitter—if he is not, I am sure someone in his office is—but if he is, he will have...

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c212
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c235
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for allowing me to intervene briefly. He has just paid tribute to the cross-party work to secure the Bill—hopefully—this evening. Does he agree that it is crucial—and I know that the hon. Member for Carmarthen East and Dinefwr (Jonathan Edwards), who is also part of...

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c235
House
House of Commons

I rise to support the motion in the name of my friend, the right hon. Member for West Dorset (Sir Oliver Letwin).

On the morning of 7 February 2017, I woke up in an isolation room at King’s College Hospital, where I was receiving chemotherapy. My blood counts were rock bottom...

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
664 cc112-3
House
House of Commons

rose—

12.45 pm

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2019
Reference
663 c993
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. As you know, I am a relatively new Member, but I thought that the determination of what was or was not in scope was for you, Sir, not for us.

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2019
Reference
663 c994
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Dame Rosie. I know we have very important subjects that Members are keen to debate, so I do not want to detain you, but could you advise me how we can indicate our reaction to the grossly offensive attack by the President of the United...

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2019
Reference
663 c231
House
House of Commons

Motion that this House has considered the functioning of the existing law relating to assisted dying. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Nick Boles
Answering member
Edward Argar; Imran Hussain
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Backbench debates
Date
4 July 2019
Reference
662 cc1411-1451
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the functioning of the existing law relating to assisted dying.

Six years ago this week, on a sunny July day like today, my father made a decision. At home in Devon, in the bed that he shared with my stepmother for more than...

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2019
Reference
662 c1412
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for her question. It is incredibly important to understand all the concerns raised, perhaps especially those from such groups. What I think drives that very understandable concern is the fear that although a law might start off tightly constrained, there will be what people refer...

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2019
Reference
662 cc1412-3
House
House of Commons

I will give way to the hon. Member for West Ham (Lyn Brown) first.

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2019
Reference
662 c1413
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady makes a very good point. All I would say is that the law could operate only with independent assessment—both by doctors and by a High Court judge, under the proposal in the most recent Bill—that would be clear that the person could not show any signs of...

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2019
Reference
662 c1413
House
House of Commons

Let me make a little progress.

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2019
Reference
662 c1413
House
House of Commons

I will give way to the hon. Lady first.

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2019
Reference
662 c1413
House
House of Commons

I could not agree more with the hon. Lady. The truth is that this is not in any way an alternative to the best possible palliative care; it is a complement to the best possible palliative care. We want to ensure that all those who want to choose to live...

Member
Nick Boles (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2019
Reference
662 c1414
House
House of Commons