Skip to main content

1-20 of 9,049 results for member:"Paul Goggins"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Education what arrangements he is making to extend the provision of foster care up to age 21.

Asked by
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Answering body
Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 January 2014
Reference
901754; 573 c94W
House
House of Commons

One issue that merits greater consideration than the half page given by the commission is the proposal for a temporary exemption from air passenger duty for new long-haul routes from airports outside London. Such an exemption would help airports such as Manchester to develop new routes to China. Will the...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 December 2013
Reference
572 c634
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State indicated earlier that he was planning a consultation on mesothelioma victims. Does he accept that the review that his Department recently carried out simply did not fulfil the requirements of section 48 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012?

Asked by
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 December 2013
Reference
572 c618
House
House of Commons

May I remind the Secretary of State that in the mid-1990s some schools in my constituency had roofs that leaked

and fewer than 10% of their pupils got five or more good GCSEs? Will he acknowledge that at the core of the many improvements that have taken place since has...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 December 2013
Reference
571 c790
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for South Swindon (Mr Buckland), who has once more shown his expert understanding and knowledge of this issue. I also compliment the hon. Member for Chatham and Aylesford (Tracey Crouch), who has again shown her utter determination to ensure that the...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2013
Reference
571 cc682-4
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is very knowledgeable about these issues and he makes an important point. I am saying that the date should be put back to at least February 2010, and there are arguments for going back further. I hope that we will have an opportunity to examine those arguments...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2013
Reference
571 c683
House
House of Commons

I am happy to be the conduit for a conversation between the Minister and my hon. Friend the Member for North Durham. I hope that we will be able to have a sensible discussion about this in Committee. Whatever the start date is, it should predate July 2012.

My third point...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2013
Reference
571 cc683-6
House
House of Commons

The Amnesty report contains a section on inquests. Has the Secretary of State been offered any explanation of why the Attorney-General in Northern Ireland, who has ordered the reopening of more than 40 historic inquests, now seems to believe that they should be abandoned?

Asked by
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
27 November 2013
Reference
571 c242
House
House of Commons

Let me tell the Secretary of State that since April the arrears of those tenants in Wythenshawe in my constituency who are affected by the bedroom tax have increased by £500,000 and that more than 1,000 families have fallen behind with their rent for the very first time. Will he take this opportunity to apologise to my constituents for the hardship that policy has created?

Asked by
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c19
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. You will be aware of the growing concern that exists about the conduct of G4S and Serco, and whether they should be allowed to continue with their bids to run probation services. Last Wednesday, I asked you whether the Justice Secretary intended to...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Points of order
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c45
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Have you had any indication from the Justice Secretary on whether he intends to come to the House and make a statement to clear up the confusion regarding the announcement by G4S yesterday that it has been overcharging for services it is contracted...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Points of order
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1256
House
House of Commons

What discussions has the Secretary of State had with his colleagues across government about the need for urgent additional investment in social care? Surely he appreciates that the savage cuts to local authority social care budgets have only added to the pressure on accident and emergency units.

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2013
Reference
570 c815
House
House of Commons

The Justice Secretary intends all those who are given short prison sentences to be supervised on release. How many will be allocated to the national probation service, and what funding is he making available?

Asked by
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
12 November 2013
Reference
570 c799
House
House of Commons

It is pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Dartford (Gareth Johnson). I am sure he will be pleased that he seemed to evoke a range of responses from different parts of the House.

Whether the Justice Secretary likes it or not, we are debating two issues here this evening. First,...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2013
Reference
570 cc691-3
House
House of Commons

That is reassuring to an extent, but my point is that risk is dynamic—it changes—and that the assessment carried out prior to release might be different from that carried out a month after release or six months after release. There is not the fluidity in the system that would allow...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2013
Reference
570 c693
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for that intervention. The truth is, of course, that because the Justice Secretary started with a model of how he wants effectively to privatise 70% of what the probation service currently delivers, he has to squeeze all that risk into that larger...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2013
Reference
570 c693
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend, who is a great expert on this issue. I am happy to admit that he and I have not always agreed on every point about probation over the years, but he well understands that service, what happens on the front line and the difficult...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2013
Reference
570 cc693-4
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman and I have discussed those issues in Committee and in the Chamber, and I know that he has speaks genuinely, but the crucial question relates to who commissions the service. If a local probation trust that understands the local need asks G4S to do the job, fair...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2013
Reference
570 cc694-6
House
House of Commons

Indeed. It is regrettable, in a way, that the Government took custody plus off the statute book rather than trying to build it up, and even work on a cross-party basis.

We are told repeatedly that the cost of supervising the 50,000 offenders who leave prison having served short sentences will...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2013
Reference
570 cc696-7
House
House of Commons

That is a very real concern and I am glad that my hon. Friend has had the chance to put that point on the record and introduce it into the debate. Groups with specific and additional needs—vulnerable female offenders or mentally ill offenders, for instance—will not be an attractive proposition...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2013
Reference
570 c697
House
House of Commons