Skip to main content

1-20 of 8,178 results for member:"Robert Neill"

Type

+ Early day motions (299) + Prayers (17)
-
Fatal prayers (14)
-
Non-fatal prayers (3)
+ Legislation (1) + Bills (1) + Public bills (1) + Private members' bills (1)
-
Ballot bills (1)
+ Members' contributions (2,902)
-
Business questions (18)
-
Maiden speeches (1)
-
Oral answers to questions (146)
-
Oral question time interventions (4)
+ Oral questions (442)
-
Prime Minister's questions (40)
-
Topical questions (96)
-
Points of order (4)
-
Proceeding contributions (2,308)
+ Parliamentary committees (27) + Committee proceedings (27)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (8)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (17)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (190) + Debates (120)
-
Adjournment debates (45)
-
Backbench debates (15)
+ Committee proceedings (27)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (8)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (17)
-
Debates on select committee reports (5)
-
e-petition debates (1)
-
Estimates days (4)
+ Legislative debates (43)
-
Debates on bills (29)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (8)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
-
Opposition days (4)
+ Formal proceedings (2)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (2)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Statements (56) + Oral statements (3)
-
Select Committee statements (3)
-
Written statements (53)
-
Urgent questions (2)
+ Written corrections (9)
-
Ministerial corrections (9)
+ Parliamentary questions (5,248)
-
Business questions (18)
+ Oral questions (442)
-
Prime Minister's questions (40)
-
Topical questions (96)
-
Urgent questions (2)
-
Written questions (4,786)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

It is a pleasure to follow my hon. Friend the Member for Cities of London and Westminster (Nickie Aiken), who reminded me that, as a young girl, she lived in Bromley. I am delighted to see her here.

Like my hon. Friend, I started my career in local government, and it...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2024
Reference
750 cc1216-1221
House
House of Commons

Madam Deputy Speaker, as we leave the House together, may I start by wishing you the very best for the future? I remember, as a keen young Opposition spokesman, being your shadow when you were Local Government Minister, and I could never have had a more charming or skilful opposite...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2024
Reference
750 cc1155-7
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way on the topic of being nice?

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2024
Reference
750 c1170
House
House of Commons

I appreciate that this is perhaps one of the most contentious bits of legislation that we have to deal with in the wash-up, but I want to thank the Minister for the constructive approach that he has always adopted towards the business, and in particular for the way that he...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2024
Reference
750 c1170
House
House of Commons

Mr Speaker, I hope to catch your eye later in today’s proceedings in order to thank you and others, but now I will confine my remarks to this measure and to congratulating the hon. Member for Blackpool South (Chris Webb).

This is a sensible measure, and I am delighted to see...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2024
Reference
750 c1140
House
House of Commons

With characteristic modesty, my hon. Friend has not mentioned his own very significant contribution on the Justice Committee and as a Minister, and the contribution that he and his family have made to the justice system. Everybody knows the work that he, his brother and his father do to deal...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2024
Reference
750 c1142
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if she will hold discussions with the Association of Optometrists on the adequacy of funding for the special schools eye care service.

Asked by
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 May 2024
Reference
26397
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that the special schools eye care service has adequate funding to enable the long-term commissioning of those services.

Asked by
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 May 2024
Reference
26398
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if she will hold discussions with the Association of Optometrists on the adequacy of funding for the special schools' eye care service.

Asked by
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 May 2024
Reference
26399
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. Friend agree that this important debate, which touches upon not only public safety but the whole way in which our justice system operates, is best dealt with in a calm fashion? It is perfectly reasonable to adopt contingency measures, which we hope are often not needed,...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2024
Reference
750 c876
House
House of Commons

This has been a wide-ranging debate, because it is a wide-ranging Bill, and it has touched on a number of difficult, sometimes sensitive and complex topics. However, the tone of the debate does the House a great deal of credit. I appreciate the tone and approach taken by both Front-Bench...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2024
Reference
750 cc364-5
House
House of Commons

I am always happy to talk about it. It is my conviction that a single piece of legislation purely on one-punch manslaughter is not the answer. If there were to be legislation, it should be a wholesale reform of the law of homicide. The Law Commission recommended a reform of...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2024
Reference
750 c366
House
House of Commons

I entirely agree with my hon. Friend. “Significant” is a good starting point for the work that we need to do. The intellectually rather convoluted approach that we have to joint enterprise at the moment

is really not tenable. A jury will understand “significant”. If we are to have an...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2024
Reference
750 c366
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Gentleman’s sentiments. Many of these matters will require consideration —and, on the homicide angle, the involvement, I hope, of the Law Commission. It could be asked to revisit its report of 2006. In fact, I hope that will be done, whatever the party in government....

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2024
Reference
750 cc367-8
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for those reassurances, but some of us have marked misgivings about the whole concept, which speaks a little more of gimmickry than anything likely to ease the real pressures on our prisons. That said, I can see that it might be a tool in...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2024
Reference
750 c303
House
House of Commons

I have a lot of sympathy with the points the shadow Minister is making. It is right that there should be a power—I think we all agree—to prevent vile offenders from showing the cowardly behaviour of not facing the relatives and hearing their sentence in person. However, the Professional Trades...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2024
Reference
750 c307
House
House of Commons

The Lord Chancellor will know that there is particular concern about the growth of the remand population in our prisons, which causes great disruption. He will also know that the senior presiding judge and others are taking innovative measures to list remand cases, but will the Lord Chancellor confirm that, to support that, there will be no financial cap on sitting days in the Crown courts?

Asked by
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
750 c135
House
House of Commons

The Minister is right to recognise the work that is being done on the victims code, and I appreciate the Government’s taking on board a number of the recommendations made by the Justice Committee when we engaged in pre-legislative scrutiny of that Bill.

The Minister will know, however, that there is a particular issue with delays in cases of rape and serious sexual offences, where cases are taken out of the list because prosecuting counsel are not available—they simply cannot be found. She rightly referred to the increase in fees for solicitors and defence counsel. Does she agree that there is now just one piece of the jigsaw that needs to be put in place: to bring the fees for prosecuting counsel in those cases up to the same level as those for defence counsel? That would take about £1.5 million. Will she sit down with the Attorney General and talk with her about how we can do that swiftly?

Asked by
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
750 c117
House
House of Commons

The Attorney General rightly refers to the work done in relation to domestic violence. The most serious offences of violence against women and girls are rape and serious sexual offences. As she will know, there are concerns that once victims have come forward, there are delays in their cases being heard, largely because of the difficulty in getting suitably experienced barristers to prosecute them. Does she accept that one of the main drivers of that is the fact that legal aid fees were increased for defence barristers, but prosecution fees have lagged behind? There is a gap of around £500 in the brief fee between prosecuting and defending. Does she agree that we must plug that gap urgently, to get suitable counsel prosecuting as well as defending those cases?

Asked by
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 May 2024
Reference
749 c683
House
House of Commons

This is a perfectly rational, sensible and pragmatic response to the pressures in our prisons, and the Minister should take credit for it. However, I do ask him to reconsider the point about the transparency of data—precisely because it is a sensible thing to do, there is no reason why...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2024
Reference
749 c578
House
House of Commons