Skip to main content

1-20 of 392 results for primarymember:"Lord Marsh"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, does the Minister not agree that it is time we looked at this situation again? There were many arguments with the then Prime Minister about nationalisation of the railway industry. The fact is that Britain is one of the very few countries in the world whose railway system is not state-owned.
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2008
Reference
703 c1509
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister agree that, although it might be quite romantic to know about Gypsies, caravans and all that lovely stuff, they can be a massive problem for people who live in rural areas?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 2008
Reference
703 c1244-5
House
House of Lords
My Lords, having been employed by this organisation, my view is that there is very little justification for believing that politicians make a better deal of running large companies than the people who spend their professional lives doing it.
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 June 2008
Reference
702 c1136
House
House of Lords
My Lords, this is a very interesting subject to practically everyone in the country. Would it be useful if a study was undertaken to find out how many people selling or buying a house think of undertaking a study themselves?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 May 2008
Reference
701 c670
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister agree—I will understand if he would not dare do so—that in addition to cyclists running into lorries there is the serious problem of pedestrians being hit by cyclists?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
699 c546
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I have been around this building for 45 years or so. Does not the Minister agree that the reality of this is that every time there is a major demonstration, it moves across on to that tiny patch of earth and is followed by the police with their horses? It is not a delicate place that everybody can enjoy, but one where the police have a serious problem.
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 February 2008
Reference
698 c944
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is the Minister aware that a much greater threat to many parts of the countryside is what are known as Travellers? Do the Government have the same degree of authority in getting some sort of Ordnung on the way in which those people behave? The local people dare not.
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
4 December 2007
Reference
696 c1606
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister believe and accept that public servants, who have no method of replying, should be constantly told how dreadfully they have behaved? Is this not happening increasingly more than it should in this House?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 November 2007
Reference
696 c1022
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the noble Lord agree that this may be a useful time to look again at whether the railway system as such should not be considered as something that the state ought to control?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 November 2007
Reference
696 c1026
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister not agree that some of this friction, which undoubtedly exists across the system, is due to the fact that this country’s network is virtually the only one that is not state owned? Does he not accept that there is at least a case for saying that we should look again at privatisation?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 October 2007
Reference
695 c698
House
House of Lords
My Lords, did the Minister say that these people are not refugees? If they are not, what are they?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
695 c3
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister agree that there is frequently a discrepancy in pay between fund managers and people who raise the money and other people because if you want to keep them, they are much more expensive than part-time directors?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
694 c789
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister have any idea at all what the Lord Chancellor thinks of this?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 June 2007
Reference
693 c92
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister agree that this does not sound the same as the doctrine of collective responsibility, which is at least turning up at the edges?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 2007
Reference
691 c7
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is the Minister aware that it took 28 years to pay off the debts from the Montreal Olympics, and that Montreal was left with a lot of equipment which has become absolutely useless? Given that we seem to have serious problems with arithmetic, does he not think that the matter ought to be reconsidered?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
22 March 2007
Reference
690 c1344
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is the Minister aware that a group of us spent a lot of time discussing this issue with the former Prime Minister Mrs Thatcher and that she was warned in many of those sessions? The Government ought not, therefore, to be terribly frightened; the proposal did not come from them in the first instance, which is unusual. Do they not now agree that the decision to privatise the entire railway system was a major mistake and that such a measure is unknown in almost every other European passenger railway system of any size, yet we continue with it and everyone hears the complaints? Is it not high time that we had a serious examination? A long time has passed; there is a lot of experience. Perhaps the Government could start the examination witha survey of what passengers think of the current system.
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2007
Reference
690 c1138-9
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister agree that, given the tragic deaths of five young people over the past six days, it might be an interesting idea and helpful to invite the relatives to participate in this? After all, they know rather more about it than any of us.
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 March 2007
Reference
690 c1001
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the basic issue is not about trees. It seems to be about the management of the railway, although it is not right to lay any particular claims about other people. Has the time not now come when it would be worth having another examination of the effects of the former Government’s decision on the structure of British Rail?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
689 c1595
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister think that there is a relationship between this problem and the growth in the practice of contracting staff into the health service on short service contracts?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
689 c1169-70
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is this not part of a general problem? Are not PSA tests a major expense for the health service? What sort of progress is being made when there seems to be so much waste?
Asked by
Lord Marsh (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 February 2007
Reference
689 c469-70
House
House of Lords