1-20 of 579 results for primarymember:"Mark Garnier"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.299 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- primarymember:"Mark Garnier"
- We searched for
- primaryMember_ses:300686
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what criteria will be used to determine which children and young people will be eligible for an Education, Health and Care Plan under the proposed reformed SEND system.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what criteria will be used to determine which children and young people will be eligible for an Education, Health and Care Plan under the proposed reformed SEND system.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what her planned timetable is to introducing the Education for All Bill.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what her planned timetable is to introducing the Education for All Bill.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what criteria will determine whether a child or young person receives support through an Individual Support Plan; and what steps she will take to ensure consistency in access to that support between local areas.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what criteria will determine whether a child or young person receives support through an Individual Support Plan; and what steps she will take to ensure consistency in access to that support between local areas.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what safeguards will be put in place for children and young people who, following a review at a transition point, move from an Education, Health and Care Plan to an Individual Support Plan.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what safeguards will be put in place for children and young people who, following a review at a transition point, move from an Education, Health and Care Plan to an Individual Support Plan.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the principal factors driving the increase in the number of Education, Health and Care Plans; and what proportion of the associated increase in expenditure she attributes to unmet need at an earlier stage.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the principal factors driving the increase in the number of Education, Health and Care Plans; and what proportion of the associated increase in expenditure she attributes to unmet need at an earlier stage.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the added value concept introduced by the Financial Conduct Authority in its proposed cryptoasset perimeter guidance (CP26/13) appears in the Regulated Activities Order or any of its exclusions.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the added value concept introduced by the Financial Conduct Authority in its proposed cryptoasset perimeter guidance (CP26/13) appears in the Regulated Activities Order or any of its exclusions.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions her Department has had with the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Victims, Violence Against Women and Girls, and International Justice on the potential correlation between dangerous driving and coercive control.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions her Department has had with the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Victims, Violence Against Women and Girls, and International Justice on the potential correlation between dangerous driving and coercive control.
The Department works across Government to tackle violence against women and girls, including with the Ministry of Justice. As part of this work, Lilian Greenwood, then Minister for Local Transport, discussed dangerous driving as a means of coercive control with Alex Davies-Jones MP, then Minister for Victims, in October 2025.
The Government's ‘Freedom from Violence and Abuse: a cross-government strategy’ includes a commitment to work to disqualify violence against women and girls offenders who have used vehicles as part of their offending behaviour or criminal acts, using existing powers. This reflects evidence that vehicles can be used in individual cases as a means of control, intimidation, harassment or abuse.
The Government has further committed to working with National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) on a strategy designed to look at opportunities to target violence against women and girls through roads policing. This important work is part of the Roads Policing Innovation Programme, a commitment under the Government's wider Road Safety Strategy.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of introducing a Graduated Driving Licence on (a) road collisions and (b) fatalities of younger car drivers.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of introducing a Graduated Driving Licence on (a) road collisions and (b) fatalities of younger car drivers.
The Department for Transport has indicated that it will not be possible to answer this question within the usual time period. An answer is being prepared and will be provided as soon as it is available.
Many commentators have commented about public sector productivity underperformance. EY tells us that the public sector has underperformed to the point where it has cut GDP growth by 3% since 2019. The Institute for Government highlights an average of nearly 1% underperformance every year for that same period. Morgan Stanley reminds us that in the last year private sector productivity was up 1.8%, but public sector underperformance dragged it back into negative territory. Despite that, public sector pay was up over 6% last year, against private sector pay up just 2.8%. Why are the Government rewarding poor performance and does the Chancellor think that is sustainable?
Many commentators have commented about public sector productivity underperformance. EY tells us that the public sector has underperformed to the point where it has cut GDP growth by 3% since 2019. The Institute for Government highlights an average of nearly 1% underperformance every year for that same period. Morgan Stanley reminds us that in the last year private sector productivity was up 1.8%, but public sector underperformance dragged it back into negative territory. Despite that, public sector pay was up over 6% last year, against private sector pay up just 2.8%. Why are the Government rewarding poor performance and does the Chancellor think that is sustainable?
I can reassure the hon. Gentleman that we are focused on driving public sector productivity to reach the efficiency targets I talked about. We are holding each Department to account on that. As I said earlier, we are seeing great progress in the NHS, which is making a huge contribution to our productivity gains as a Government.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, when he expects to review the proposed 40% prudential risk weighting for cryptoassets, including non-UK stablecoins; and what international (a) regulatory developments and (b) market conditions would trigger such a review.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, when he expects to review the proposed 40% prudential risk weighting for cryptoassets, including non-UK stablecoins; and what international (a) regulatory developments and (b) market conditions would trigger such a review.
The Government's objective is to deliver a UK cryptoasset regime that appropriately balances the protection of consumers from detriment with a regulatory environment that supports innovation and growth.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), as the independent expert regulator, is responsible for setting the prudential regime for regulated cryptoasset firms and ensuring firms hold appropriate financial resources and manage risks effectively.
The Government continues to maintain close dialogue with the FCA, including on international regulatory and market developments.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he plans to update the Financial Collateral Arrangements (No. 2) Regulations 2003 to ensure that tokenised assets receive the same legal treatment as traditional counterparts.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he plans to update the Financial Collateral Arrangements (No. 2) Regulations 2003 to ensure that tokenised assets receive the same legal treatment as traditional counterparts.
It is important that our legal framework supports digital innovation. As set out in the Wholesale Financial Markets Digital Strategy, the government is committed to providing legal clarity where it is needed.
We are engaging with the sector to understand what barriers to tokenisation exist in law. The regulators are also seeking to provide clarity to support the equivalent treatment of tokenised and non-tokenised assets, both prudentially and as eligible collateral where risks are comparable.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of the Financial Conduct Authority's proposed added value test in the Cryptoasset Permitter Guidance on the development of UK decentralised finance infrastructure.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of the Financial Conduct Authority's proposed added value test in the Cryptoasset Permitter Guidance on the development of UK decentralised finance infrastructure.
The Government's objective is to deliver a UK cryptoasset regime that appropriately balances the protection of consumers from detriment with a regulatory environment that supports innovation and growth. The Government continues its close engagement with the Financial Conduct Authority to that end.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that the Financial Conduct Authority's proposed perimeter guidance on cryptoassets does not treat developers and maintainers of decentralised finance protocols as regulated financial intermediaries.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that the Financial Conduct Authority's proposed perimeter guidance on cryptoassets does not treat developers and maintainers of decentralised finance protocols as regulated financial intermediaries.
The Government's objective is to deliver a UK cryptoasset regime that appropriately balances the protection of consumers from detriment with a regulatory environment that supports innovation and growth. The Government continues its close engagement with the Financial Conduct Authority to that end.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he is working with the Financial Conduct Authority to ensure that its proposed approach to decentralised finance does not reduce innovation by restricting access to DeFi protocols.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he is working with the Financial Conduct Authority to ensure that its proposed approach to decentralised finance does not reduce innovation by restricting access to DeFi protocols.
The Government's objective is to deliver a UK cryptoasset regime that appropriately balances the protection of consumers from detriment with a regulatory environment that supports innovation and growth. The Government continues its close engagement with the Financial Conduct Authority to that end.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps he is taking to ensure the consultation entitled Discussion paper on key elements of the Scale Policy has regard to clause (a) 40, sub-section 28L and (b) 45 of the Pension Schemes Act.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps he is taking to ensure the consultation entitled Discussion paper on key elements of the Scale Policy has regard to clause (a) 40, sub-section 28L and (b) 45 of the Pension Schemes Act.
The ‘Discussion Paper on the key elements of the Scale Policy’ was published in July and seeks industry views on how scale can be demonstrated, as well as greater detail on the current operation of default arrangements and investment strategies in multi-employer defined contribution (DC) schemes. These responses, along with further targeted stakeholder engagement, will support the development of detailed regulations for the scale policy, which we will consult on in 2027.
As part of the detailed policy design, the Government is committed to balance the desired outcomes across innovation, competition, scale, scheme governance and of course the vital objective of better member outcomes.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment has been made of the potential impact on peoples' retirement savings of replacing the Lifetime ISA with the proposed First-Time Buyer ISA.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment has been made of the potential impact on peoples' retirement savings of replacing the Lifetime ISA with the proposed First-Time Buyer ISA.
The Government recognises that the Lifetime ISA (LISA) is not working for everyone and that its dual purpose of supporting both home ownership and retirement saving can create complexity for savers. The Government is therefore consulting on a new FTB ISA product, setting out options for a simpler product focused on supporting first-time buyers.
The Government is carefully considering responses to the FTB ISA consultation, including the fiscal impact of different design. Any decisions on the detailed design of the product, including matters affecting Exchequer costs, will be taken in the round and announced in the usual way.
The published FTB ISA consultation confirmed that until the new product is offered it will be possible to open a LISA. After the new product is introduced, it will not be possible to open a LISA, but existing LISA holders, including those currently using the LISA for retirement, will continue to be able to use their accounts in line with the existing rules. More information can be found here First Time Buyer ISA consultation - GOV.UK.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate his Department has made of the cost savings which will result from ending the retirement savings function of the Lifetime ISA under the new First-Time Buyer ISA.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate his Department has made of the cost savings which will result from ending the retirement savings function of the Lifetime ISA under the new First-Time Buyer ISA.
The Government recognises that the Lifetime ISA (LISA) is not working for everyone and that its dual purpose of supporting both home ownership and retirement saving can create complexity for savers. The Government is therefore consulting on a new FTB ISA product, setting out options for a simpler product focused on supporting first-time buyers.
The Government is carefully considering responses to the FTB ISA consultation, including the fiscal impact of different design. Any decisions on the detailed design of the product, including matters affecting Exchequer costs, will be taken in the round and announced in the usual way.
The published FTB ISA consultation confirmed that until the new product is offered it will be possible to open a LISA. After the new product is introduced, it will not be possible to open a LISA, but existing LISA holders, including those currently using the LISA for retirement, will continue to be able to use their accounts in line with the existing rules. More information can be found here First Time Buyer ISA consultation - GOV.UK.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will publish an economic impact assessment comparing the proposed First-Time Buyer ISA with the Lifetime ISA.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will publish an economic impact assessment comparing the proposed First-Time Buyer ISA with the Lifetime ISA.
The Government recognises that the Lifetime ISA (LISA) is not working for everyone and that its dual purpose of supporting both home ownership and retirement saving can create complexity for savers. The Government is therefore consulting on a new FTB ISA product, setting out options for a simpler product focused on supporting first-time buyers.
The Government is carefully considering responses to the FTB ISA consultation, including the fiscal impact of different design. Any decisions on the detailed design of the product, including matters affecting Exchequer costs, will be taken in the round and announced in the usual way.
The published FTB ISA consultation confirmed that until the new product is offered it will be possible to open a LISA. After the new product is introduced, it will not be possible to open a LISA, but existing LISA holders, including those currently using the LISA for retirement, will continue to be able to use their accounts in line with the existing rules. More information can be found here First Time Buyer ISA consultation - GOV.UK.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Government plans to use the powers in the Financial Services and Markets Bill 2026 to establish a mutual recognition framework for digital assets, including stablecoins, to support the UK's competitiveness as a global financial centre.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Government plans to use the powers in the Financial Services and Markets Bill 2026 to establish a mutual recognition framework for digital assets, including stablecoins, to support the UK's competitiveness as a global financial centre.
The Government acknowledges the potential benefits of recognising compatible jurisdictions’ regulatory regimes, including promoting growth and competitiveness by supporting cross-border activity.
The Financial Services and Markets Bill will enable HM Treasury to establish bespoke Overseas Recognition Regimes, where doing so will benefit the UK. The Government will consider using these powers for digital assets, where appropriate, subject to an assessment of the compatibility of the relevant jurisdiction’s regulatory and supervisory framework.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, following the conclusion of the consultation entitled ‘Trust-based pension schemes: Trustees and governance, building a stronger future’, what steps he will take to ensure any guidance to pension fund trustees remains voluntary.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, following the conclusion of the consultation entitled ‘Trust-based pension schemes: Trustees and governance, building a stronger future’, what steps he will take to ensure any guidance to pension fund trustees remains voluntary.
Trustees of occupational pension schemes must act in accordance with their legal and fiduciary duties and in the interests of scheme members. The consultation ‘Trust-based pension schemes: Trustees and governance, building a stronger future’ seeks views on trustee standards, governance and administration and does not alter those duties.