1-20 of 80 results for primarymember:"Martin Bell"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.316 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- primarymember:"Martin Bell"
- We searched for
- primaryMember_ses:299099
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Supplementary on recruitment to infantry regiments.
Supplementary on recruitment to infantry regiments.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
23 April 2001
Subjects
Armed forces; Army; Recruitment
Date
23 April 2001
Reference
367 c10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, what estimate he has made of the impact on the weekly pensions of men aged 60 to 64 who, had they been women, would have qualified to receive the state pension, of allocating to them the funds for the proposed increase...
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, what estimate he has made of the impact on the weekly pensions of men aged 60 to 64 who, had they been women, would have qualified to receive the state pension, of allocating to them the funds for the proposed increase...
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answered by
Lord Rooker
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
8 March 2001
For answer on
14 March 2001
Answered on
14 March 2001
Mr. Martin Bell: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what estimate he has made of the impact on the weekly pensions of
men aged 60 to 64 who, had they been women, would have qualified to receive the state pension, of allocating to them the funds for
the proposed increase to existing pensioners. [153500]
Mr. Rooker: A man cannot draw State Retirement Pension before he reaches State pension age. Therefore no estimate has been made.
Subjects
Men; State retirement pensions
Date
14 March 2001
Reference
153500; 364 c605W
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on KFOR and whether there will be support for Government for peacekeeping operation for as long as it takes.
Supplementary on KFOR and whether there will be support for Government for peacekeeping operation for as long as it takes.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
12 February 2001
Subjects
Armed forces; Peacekeeping operations; Kosovo; KFOR
Date
12 February 2001
Reference
363 c6
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on the award of political honours.
1st supplementary on the award of political honours.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
7 February 2001
Subjects
Honours
Date
7 February 2001
Reference
362 c925
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Prime Minister, If he will list his official engagements for Wednesday 7th February. (Question not printed)
To ask the Prime Minister, If he will list his official engagements for Wednesday 7th February. (Question not printed)
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answered by
Tony Blair
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Tabled on
24 January 2001
For answer on
7 February 2001
Answered on
7 February 2001
Subjects
Honours
Date
7 February 2001
Reference
362 c925; 147673
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, if the proposed increase to be paid to existing state pensioners were to be applied to men aged 60 to 65 years, how much that pension would be for (a) 2001-02 and (b) 2002-03.
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, if the proposed increase to be paid to existing state pensioners were to be applied to men aged 60 to 65 years, how much that pension would be for (a) 2001-02 and (b) 2002-03.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answered by
Lord Rooker
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
25 January 2001
For answer on
5 February 2001
Answered on
5 February 2001
Mr. Martin Bell: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if the proposed increase to be paid to existing state pensioners
were to be applied to men aged 60 to 65 years, how much that pension would be for (a) 2001-02 and (b) 2002-03. [147845]
Mr. Rooker: Men currently do not receive a basic State Retirement Pension before the age of 65 years and entitlement is dependent
upon the individual's National Insurance record. It would not be dependent upon the numbers of pensioners.
Subjects
Pensions; State retirement pensions; Uprating
Date
5 February 2001
Reference
147845; 362 c365W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what plans he has to equalise, between men and women, the age at which the concessionary bus pass is available.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what plans he has to equalise, between men and women, the age at which the concessionary bus pass is available.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answered by
Keith Hill
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
25 January 2001
For answer on
2 February 2001
Answered on
2 February 2001
Mr. Martin Bell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what plans he has to equalise, between
men and women, the age at which the concessionary bus pass is available. [147844]
Mr. Hill: The law currently provides for equalisation in respect of travel concessions on the same basis, and to the same timetable,
as for national pensions--that is, over a transitional period of 10 years starting in 2010.
The matter is however presently the subject of a case currently before the European Court of Human Rights, and we will consider our
position in the light of developments.
Subjects
Bus services; Concessions; Fares; Equality; Pensioners
Date
2 February 2001
Reference
147844; 362 c313W
House
House of Commons
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on Far East Prisoners of War
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on Far East Prisoners of War
Lead member
Martin Bell
Answering member
Lord Moonie
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Adjournment debates
Subjects
Compensation; Japan; Prisoners of war; World War II; Veterans
Date
31 October 2000
Reference
355 c184-90WH
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on possibility of a new inquiry into the crash of the Chinook helicopter on Mull of Kintyre in 1994.
Supplementary on possibility of a new inquiry into the crash of the Chinook helicopter on Mull of Kintyre in 1994.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
30 October 2000
Subjects
Accidents; Inquiries; Chinook helicopters; Mull of Kintyre
Date
30 October 2000
Reference
355 c499
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress is being made in fitting flight data recorders to Lynx, Puma and Sea King helicopters.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress is being made in fitting flight data recorders to Lynx, Puma and Sea King helicopters.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answered by
Lord Moonie
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
11 July 2000
For answer on
19 July 2000
Answered on
19 July 2000
Mr. Martin Bell: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what progress is being made in fitting flight data recorders to Lynx,
Puma and Sea King helicopters. [130472]
Dr. Moonie: Both the Royal Navy and Army Lynx aircraft are to undergo major upgrades: for the Royal Navy aircraft this will be
through the Mark 8 Enhancement package, and for the Army aircraft through the Future Lynx programme. In both of these programmes,
the aircraft will be fitted with a Health and Usage Monitoring System which includes Cockpit Voice and Flight Data Recorders
(CVFDR). Work has been taking place to assess how to fit the equipment to the aircraft, and we aim to place a contract in the spring
of 2001.
A proposal to fit CVFDRs to our Sea King and Puma fleets is under consideration.
Subjects
Equipment; Helicopters; Military aircraft; Safety; Lynx helicopters; Sea King helicopters
Date
19 July 2000
Reference
354 c183W; 130472
House
House of Commons
Supplementary that BBC World Service in radio and television is Britains greatest diplomatic asset.
Supplementary that BBC World Service in radio and television is Britains greatest diplomatic asset.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
18 July 2000
Subjects
Foreign relations; BBC World Service; Overseas broadcasting
Date
18 July 2000
Reference
354 c210
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on reexamination of the verdict on the two pilots of the RAF Chinook that crashed in the Mull of Kintyre in 1994.
1st supplementary on reexamination of the verdict on the two pilots of the RAF Chinook that crashed in the Mull of Kintyre in 1994.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
12 July 2000
Subjects
Accidents; Crew; Inquiries; Helicopters; Chinook helicopters; Mull of Kintyre
Date
12 July 2000
Reference
353 c866
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Prime Minister, What plans he has to visit the Tatton constituency. - No immediate plans to do so.
To ask the Prime Minister, What plans he has to visit the Tatton constituency. - No immediate plans to do so.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answered by
Tony Blair
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Tabled on
28 June 2000
For answer on
12 July 2000
Answered on
12 July 2000
Subjects
Accidents; Crew; Inquiries; Helicopters; Chinook helicopters; Mull of Kintyre
Date
12 July 2000
Reference
353 c866; 128675
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on compensation for former British prisoners of war held by the Japanese which is a matter not of money but of honour.
Supplementary on compensation for former British prisoners of war held by the Japanese which is a matter not of money but of honour.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
3 July 2000
Subjects
Compensation; Japan; World War II; Prisoners of war
Date
3 July 2000
Reference
353 c14-5
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the crash of RAF Chinook helicopter ZD576.
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the crash of RAF Chinook helicopter ZD576.
Lead member
Martin Bell
Answering member
Lord Moonie
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Adjournment debates
Subjects
Accidents; Air force; Inquiries; Helicopters; Safety; Chinook helicopters; Mull of Kintyre
Date
27 June 2000
Reference
352 c155-76WH
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on whether troops in Sierra Leone have significant armour to protect them.
Supplementary on whether troops in Sierra Leone have significant armour to protect them.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
5 June 2000
Subjects
Armed forces; Peacekeeping operations; Sierra Leone
Date
5 June 2000
Reference
351 c14
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what plans he has to give British nuclear test veterans access to their records.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what plans he has to give British nuclear test veterans access to their records.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answered by
Lord Moonie
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
23 May 2000
For answer on
5 June 2000
Answered on
5 June 2000
Mr. Martin Bell: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has to give British nuclear test veterans access to their
records. [123963]
Dr. Moonie: I assume the hon. Member is referring to official Service records, including medical records. It has always been the
case that ex-Service personnel may request the details contained in such records though it has been usual for medical information to
be passed to an individual's GP or legal representative. In the case of nuclear test veterans, they are also entitled to request any
information held relating to their exposure to radiation during their participation in the UK's nuclear test programme in the 1950s
and 1960s.
Subjects
Access; Disclosure of information; Nuclear weapons; Radiation exposure; Medical records; Testing; Veterans
Date
5 June 2000
Reference
123963; 351 c19W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Prime Minister, If he will list his official engagements for Wednesday 17th May. (Question not printed).
To ask the Prime Minister, If he will list his official engagements for Wednesday 17th May. (Question not printed).
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answered by
Tony Blair
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Tabled on
3 May 2000
For answer on
17 May 2000
Answered on
17 May 2000
Subjects
Japan; Prisoners of war; World War II; Ex gratia payments
Date
17 May 2000
Reference
350 c332; 121180
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on gratuity for former Far East prisoners of war.
1st supplementary on gratuity for former Far East prisoners of war.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
17 May 2000
Subjects
Japan; Prisoners of war; World War II; Ex gratia payments
Date
17 May 2000
Reference
350 c332
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will provide details of the indicated airspeed of RAF Chinook 2D576 during the last 40 seconds of flight as it approached the Mull of Kintyre on 2nd June 1994. - Inc figure.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will provide details of the indicated airspeed of RAF Chinook 2D576 during the last 40 seconds of flight as it approached the Mull of Kintyre on 2nd June 1994. - Inc figure.
Asked by
Martin Bell
(Independent (affiliation))
Answered by
Lord Spellar
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
18 April 2000
For answer on
3 May 2000
Answered on
3 May 2000
Mr. Martin Bell: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will provide details of the indicated airspeed of RAF Chinook ZD576
during the last 40 seconds of flight as it approached the Mull of Kintyre on 2 June 1994. [120101]
Mr. Spellar: The Board of Inquiry considered data extracted from the aircraft's systems, the Air Accident Investigation Board
technical report, the flight path simulations from Boeing Helicopters and a separate investigation from Defence Research Agency
Bedford, together with witness evidence. The Board concluded that it was most likely that while coasting in at the Mull of Kintyre
the aircraft was established in a steady climb, with an airspeed of about 150 knots, until approximately four seconds before impact.
Subjects
Accidents; Chinook helicopters; Mull of Kintyre
Date
3 May 2000
Reference
349 c112W; 120101
House
House of Commons