1-20 of 1,357 results for primarymember:"Michael Moore"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.274 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.006 seconds
- Search query
- primarymember:"Michael Moore"
- We searched for
- primaryMember_ses:302472
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
The single market of the United Kingdom is vital to the fish processors and agricultural producers of
Berwickshire, the coat hanger manufacturers of Jedburgh and the world-class knitwear manufacturers of Hawick, among others, so does my right hon. Friend agree that one of the major achievements of the Smith commission was to bring more powers to Scotland, but preserve that single market?
The single market of the United Kingdom is vital to the fish processors and agricultural producers of
Berwickshire, the coat hanger manufacturers of Jedburgh and the world-class knitwear manufacturers of Hawick, among others, so does my right hon. Friend agree that one of the major achievements of the Smith commission was to bring more powers to Scotland, but preserve that single market?
Yes, absolutely. I particularly enjoyed joining my right hon. Friend recently in his constituency and learning from him about not only the challenges but the opportunities facing the knitwear industry. I know that that industry is of great importance to the economy in his area, and he has been a remarkable champion of it over the years.
For more than 50 years, thalidomiders have been campaigning for justice, particularly from the German manufacturers Grünenthal. Now that more than 150 MPs have signed an open letter to the German Chancellor, would the Prime Minister add this to his busy agenda today so that we might get a decent and fair settlement for all concerned?
For more than 50 years, thalidomiders have been campaigning for justice, particularly from the German manufacturers Grünenthal. Now that more than 150 MPs have signed an open letter to the German Chancellor, would the Prime Minister add this to his busy agenda today so that we might get a decent and fair settlement for all concerned?
I have raised this issue on behalf of a constituent, not only through the European Parliament but with the German authorities, and I shall certainly reflect on what the right hon. Gentleman says.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what the date was of each meeting of the Finance Quad in each calendar year from 2010; which Ministers from the (a) Government and (b) devolved administrations took part in each such meeting; what the agenda was for each such meeting; and what...
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what the date was of each meeting of the Finance Quad in each calendar year from 2010; which Ministers from the (a) Government and (b) devolved administrations took part in each such meeting; what the agenda was for each such meeting; and what...
In this Parliament, the Finance Ministers’ Quadrilateral met on the following dates:
15 July and 15 September 2010
14 July 2011
5 March and 8 November 2012
3 June and 18 November 2013
The agenda for Finance Quadrilateral meetings typically covers an update on the UK economy and the circumstances of each of the devolved administrations, as well as examining practical and technical arrangements relating to devolved funding. A list of agenda items covered at each meeting is included in the Annual Reports of the Joint Ministerial Committee.
Treasury Ministers and Finance Ministers from each of the devolved administrations also maintain regular contact throughout the year covering a range of matters of mutual interest
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, on which dates the Joint Exchequer Committee has met; which Ministers from the Government and the Scottish Government attended each such meeting; what the agenda was for each such meeting; and what other topics were discussed at each such meeting.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, on which dates the Joint Exchequer Committee has met; which Ministers from the Government and the Scottish Government attended each such meeting; what the agenda was for each such meeting; and what other topics were discussed at each such meeting.
In this Parliament, the Finance Ministers’ Quadrilateral met on the following dates:
15 July and 15 September 2010
14 July 2011
5 March and 8 November 2012
3 June and 18 November 2013
The agenda for Finance Quadrilateral meetings typically covers an update on the UK economy and the circumstances of each of the devolved administrations, as well as examining practical and technical arrangements relating to devolved funding. A list of agenda items covered at each meeting is included in the Annual Reports of the Joint Ministerial Committee.
Treasury Ministers and Finance Ministers from each of the devolved administrations also maintain regular contact throughout the year covering a range of matters of mutual interest
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, on what dates the (a) Joint Ministerial Committee (JMC) and (b) sub-committees of the JMC met in each calendar year from 2010; which Ministers from the (i) Government and (ii) devolved administrations took part in each such meeting; what the agenda was...
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, on what dates the (a) Joint Ministerial Committee (JMC) and (b) sub-committees of the JMC met in each calendar year from 2010; which Ministers from the (i) Government and (ii) devolved administrations took part in each such meeting; what the agenda was...
In line with the Memorandum of Understanding between the United Kingdom and the Devolved Administrations, the proceedings of the Joint Ministerial Committee are not made public. However we do publish an annual report which sets out the date of each JMC meeting and the topics covered. Copies of reports from 2009-10 onwards have been placed in the Library of the House.
Motion that the House sit in private. Negatived on question. Report stage. New clause 1, discussed with new clauses 2 to 7, and new schedules 1 and 2. Closure motion. Agreed to on division (146 to 6). New clause 1 negatived on division (6 to 148). New clause 5 negatived on division (4 to 147). New clause 7 negatived on division (4 to 149). Third reading. Closure motion. Agreed to on division (145 to 5). Main question agreed to on division (146 to 5). Bill read the third time and passed.
Motion that the House sit in private. Negatived on question. Report stage. New clause 1, discussed with new clauses 2 to 7, and new schedules 1 and 2. Closure motion. Agreed to on division (146 to 6). New clause 1 negatived on division (6 to 148). New clause 5 negatived...
Sittings motion amended. Clause 5, discussed with Government new clause 2 (Independent evaluation of official development assistance), disagreed to. Clause 6 agreed to as amended. Schedule disagreed to. Government new clause 2 agreed to. Bill, as amended, to be reported (Bill 119).
Sittings motion amended. Clause 5, discussed with Government new clause 2 (Independent evaluation of official development assistance), disagreed to. Clause 6 agreed to as amended. Schedule disagreed to. Government new clause 2 agreed to. Bill, as amended, to be reported (Bill 119).
Sittings motion agreed to. Clauses 1 to 4 agreed to.
Sittings motion agreed to. Clauses 1 to 4 agreed to.
Motion that the House sit in private. Negatived on division (4 to 106). Second reading. Proceedings interrupted.
Motion that the House sit in private. Negatived on division (4 to 106). Second reading. Proceedings interrupted.
Presentation and first reading (Bill 14). To be read a second time on 12 September.
Presentation and first reading (Bill 14). To be read a second time on 12 September.
Anybody who pauses at the top of the hill on the Carter Bar on the A68 is able to reflect on one of the most beautiful views of Scotland and on one of the most beautiful views of England, and reflect on the fact that these two countries have so much in common and so much shared family experience. Does my right hon. Friend share my hope that that will always be the case, rather than it marking the border point between two separate states?
Anybody who pauses at the top of the hill on the Carter Bar on the A68 is able to reflect on one of the most beautiful views of Scotland and on one of the most beautiful views of England, and reflect on the fact that these two countries have so much in common and so much shared family experience. Does my right hon. Friend share my hope that that will always be the case, rather than it marking the border point between two separate states?
I very much agree with my right hon. Friend. I always think of the United Kingdom as being a family of nations. Of course, like all families, we do have those moments where we have disagreements, and we do occasionally want to do things in a slightly different way, but as a family the ties that bind us are so much greater than the differences that divide us. That is why I believe that Scotland, come 18 September, will choose to remain part of that family of UK nations.
Today’s GDP figures are particularly welcome and the contribution by manufacturing is especially impressive. Many manufacturers are investing heavily in skills, but get frustrated that their skilled employees are poached by others who are not making that investment. What measures can the Minister suggest to help to share the burden of investment in skills?
Today’s GDP figures are particularly welcome and the contribution by manufacturing is especially impressive. Many manufacturers are investing heavily in skills, but get frustrated that their skilled employees are poached by others who are not making that investment. What measures can the Minister suggest to help to share the burden of investment in skills?
I thank the right hon. Gentleman for that question. He is absolutely right. Skills is an issue mentioned, I am sure, to all Members from all parts of
the House every time they visit their local businesses. We have invested in apprenticeships, so we are growing a skilled work force. In 2012-13, the Government supported 66,000 apprenticeship starts in engineering and manufacturing technologies. He is right that we have to invest in skills all the way through the work force and all the way through their working life, but we are making a great start with apprenticeships.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs which member states of the European Union are founding members of its predecessor organisation, the European Economic Community; and for those which were not founding members, what the (a) year was that the initial formal applications for member state...
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs which member states of the European Union are founding members of its predecessor organisation, the European Economic Community; and for those which were not founding members, what the (a) year was that the initial formal applications for member state...
The following table contains the technical dates and details as requested. The data in the table refers to Council processes rather than European Council processes as the treaties provide that applications for membership must be addressed to the Council and not the European Council.
| Country | (a)
Application for
membership | (b)
Council consideration of membership
application | (c)
Time between (a) and
(b) | (d)
Council Decision on accession of new
countries | (e)
Time between Council consideration and Council decision on accession
(years) | (f)
Final ratification of Accession
Treaty | (g)
Time between Council Decision and final ratification
(years) | (h)
Date of
Accession |
| Croatia | 20
February
2003 | 14
April
2003 | 2
months | 5
December
2011 | 8.5 | 21
June
2013 | 1.5 | 1
July
2013 |
| Romania | 22
June
1995 | 17
July
1995 | 1
month | 25
April
2005 | 10 | 20
December
2006 | 1.5 | 1
January
2007 |
| Bulgaria | 14
December
1995 | 29
January
1996 | 1
month | 25
April
2005 | 9 | 20
December
2006 | 1.5 | 1
January
2007 |
| Czech
Republic | 17
January
1996 | 29
January
1996 | Less
than 1
month | 14
April
2003 | 7 | 21
April
2004 | 1 | 1
May
2004 |
| Estonia | 28
November
1995 | 4
December
1995 | Less
than 1
month | 14
April
2003 | 7.5 | 21
April
2004 | 1 | 1
May
2004 |
| Hungary | 31
March
1994 | 18
April
1994 | Less
than 1
month | 14
April
2003 | 9 | 21
April
2004 | 1 | 1
May
2004 |
| Poland | 5
April
1994 | 18
April
1994 | Less
than 1
month | 14
April
2003 | 9 | 21
April
2004 | 1 | 1
May
2004 |
| Slovenia | 10
June
1996 | 16
July
1996 | 1
month | 14
April
2003 | 7 | 21
April
2004 | 1 | 1
May
2004 |
| Latvia | 27
October
1995 | 30
October
1995 | Less
than 1
month | 14
April
2003 | 8 | 21
April
2004 | 1 | 1
May
2004 |
| Lithuania | 8
December
1995 | 29
January
1996 | 1
month | 14
April
2003 | 7 | 21
April
2004 | 1 | 1
May
2004 |
| Slovakia | 27
June
1995 | 17
July
1995 | Less
than 1
month | 14
April
2003 | 8 | 21
April
2004 | 1 | 1
May
2004 |
| Malta | 16
July
1990 | 17
September
1990 | 2
months | 14
April
2003 | 13 | 21
April
2004 | 1 | 1
May
2004 |
| Cyprus | 3
July
1990 | 17
September
1990 | 2
months | 14
April
2003 | 13 | 21
April
2004 | 1 | 1
May
2004 |
| Austria | 17
July
1989 | 28
July
1989 | Less
than 1
month | 16
May
1994 | 5 | 30
December
1994 | 0.5 | 1
January
1995 |
| Sweden | 1
July
1991 | 29
July
1991 | Less
than 1
month | 16
May
1994 | 3 | 30
December
1994 | 0.5 | 1
January
1995 |
| Finland | 18
March
1992 | 6
April
1992 | Less
than 2
months | 16
May
1994 | 2 | 30
December
1994 | 0.5 | 1
January
1995 |
| Spain | 28
July
1977 | 20
September
1977 | Less
than 2
months | 11
June
1985 | 7.5 | 27
December
1985 | 0.5 | 1
January
1986 |
| Portugal | 28
March
1977 | 5
April
1977 | Less
than 1
month | 11
June
1985 | 7.5 | 27
December
1985 | 0.5 | 1
January
1986 |
| Greece | 12
June
1975 | 24
June
1975 | Less
than 1
month | 24
May
1979 | 4 | 25
June
1980 | 1 | 1
January
1981 |
| UK | 2
May
1967 | 10
July
1967 | Less
than 3
months | 22
January
1972 | 4.5 | 29
December
1972 | 1 | 1
January 1973 |
| Ireland | 10
May
1967 | 10
July
1967 | 2
months | 22
January
1972 | 4.5 | 29
December
1972 | 1 | 1
January
1973 |
| Denmark | 11
May
1967 | 10
July
1967 | 2
months | 22
January
1972 | 4.5 | 29
December
1972 | 1 | 1
January
1973 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs which states, or parts thereof, have (a) applied for and (b) achieved member state status of the European Union under (i) Article 48 and (ii) Article 49 of the Treaty of European Union, or equivalent earlier treaty provision.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs which states, or parts thereof, have (a) applied for and (b) achieved member state status of the European Union under (i) Article 48 and (ii) Article 49 of the Treaty of European Union, or equivalent earlier treaty provision.
Of the 22 countries that have joined the six founding states as full EU members, all joined under article 49 of the treaty on European Union or equivalent earlier treaty provision. There are currently five recognised candidate countries (Iceland, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Turkey), all of whom are applying for member status under article 49. Article 48
of the treaty on European Union, or equivalent earlier treaty provision, has never been used to expand the membership of the European economic community or EU.
The Chancellor made some important announcements last week about the future of the Royal Bank of Scotland. Although we are absolutely right to keep pressing the bank to improve its poor lending record, will he also put on record the need for us to recognise the hugely important private sector jobs underpinned by RBS in Scotland and elsewhere, and the fact that we see a strong future for that company?
The Chancellor made some important announcements last week about the future of the Royal Bank of Scotland. Although we are absolutely right to keep pressing the bank to improve its poor lending record, will he also put on record the need for us to recognise the hugely important private sector jobs underpinned by RBS in Scotland and elsewhere, and the fact that we see a strong future for that company?
I have discussed RBS and what we can do to ensure that it supports the Scottish economy with my right hon. Friend on many occasions. The plan that the management has proposed, which we and the Governor of the Bank of England support—it is the first time since RBS collapsed in autumn 2008 that all those groups agree on a single strategy for the bank—will mean a strong, healthy future for RBS as a bank that supports the entire United Kingdom economy and, in particular, the Scottish economy. It is an important part of Scottish economic history and of Scotland’s economic future, too.
[Relevant document: the Sixth Report of the Scottish Affairs Committee, on The Referendum on Separation for Scotland: The proposed Section 30 Order—Can a player also be the referee?, HC 863.] Debate on a motion to approve the draft Scotland Act 1998 (Modification of Schedule 5) Order 2013. Agreed to on question.
[Relevant document: the Sixth Report of the Scottish Affairs Committee, on The Referendum on Separation for Scotland: The proposed Section 30 Order—Can a player also be the referee?, HC 863.] Debate on a motion to approve the draft Scotland Act 1998 (Modification of Schedule 5) Order 2013. Agreed to on...
I am not sure how the Work programme would be affected by a different currency or the currency arrangements after independence, should that be the way we go. My right hon. Friend the Under-Secretary would be delighted to meet the hon. Member for Dundee West (Jim McGovern) as soon as possible to discuss the important issue that he has raised. We will make sure that that happens.
I am not sure how the Work programme would be affected by a different currency or the currency arrangements after independence, should that be the way we go. My right hon. Friend the Under-Secretary would be delighted to meet the hon. Member for Dundee West (Jim McGovern) as soon as possible to discuss the important issue that he has raised. We will make sure that that happens.
Statement on Scotland's constitutional future in the United Kingdom.
Statement on Scotland's constitutional future in the United Kingdom.
Scotland Bill. Second reading debate. Amendment negatived on division (5 to 252). Main question agreed. Programme motion relating to committee of the whole House, consideration, third reading and Lords amendments agreed on question (formal). Money resolution agreed on question (formal). Ways and means resolution agreed on question (formal).
Scotland Bill. Second reading debate. Amendment negatived on division (5 to 252). Main question agreed. Programme motion relating to committee of the whole House, consideration, third reading and Lords amendments agreed on question (formal). Money resolution agreed on question (formal). Ways and means resolution agreed on question (formal).
Scotland Bill. Presentation and first reading. (Bill 115 2010-12). To be read a second time tomorrow.
Scotland Bill. Presentation and first reading. (Bill 115 2010-12). To be read a second time tomorrow.