1-20 of 464 results for primarymember:"Nick Palmer"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.338 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- primarymember:"Nick Palmer"
- We searched for
- primaryMember_ses:302811
Type
-
Early day motions (45)
+
Members' contributions (192)
+
Oral questions (192)
-
Prime Minister's questions (38)
-
Topical questions (1)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (19)
+
Debates (15)
-
Adjournment debates (6)
+
Legislative debates (9)
-
Debates on bills (9)
+
Formal proceedings (1)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
+
Petitions and observations (2)
-
Paper petitions (2)
+
Parliamentary questions (400)
+
Oral questions (192)
-
Prime Minister's questions (38)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Written questions (208)
+
Petitions and observations (2)
-
Paper petitions (2)
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
That this House notes that the Knesset is currently considering a bill to ban the commercial fur trade; further notes that there would be an exclusion in this ban for fur used for religious purposes; further notes that a recent poll in Israel showed that 79 per cent. of people in that country support the ban; further notes that, while fur factory farming and the use of steel-jawed leghold traps are banned in the UK, furs produced using these cruel methods are still on sale here; and calls on the Government to take note of this proposed legislation and to bring in a ban on the fur trade in the UK as soon as possible.
That this House notes that the Knesset is currently considering a bill to ban the commercial fur trade; further notes that there would be an exclusion in this ban for fur used for religious purposes; further notes that a recent poll in Israel showed that 79 per cent. of people...
Primary sponsor
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Subjects
Animal welfare; Trade
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
1225
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he has discussed with Post Office Ltd. the award of the contract set out in tender notice 2009/S 247-354963.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he has discussed with Post Office Ltd. the award of the contract set out in tender notice 2009/S 247-354963.
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answered by
Meg Hillier
(Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
25 February 2010
For answer on
1 March 2010
Answered on
11 March 2010
The Secretary of State for the Home Department, has not discussed with Post Office Ltd. the award of the contract set out in tender notice 2009/S 247-354963.
Subjects
Contracts; Identity and Passport Service
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
507 c449W; 319963
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he made an assessment of awarding the contract set out in tender notice 2009/S 247-354963 to Post Office Ltd outside the competitive process.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he made an assessment of awarding the contract set out in tender notice 2009/S 247-354963 to Post Office Ltd outside the competitive process.
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answered by
Meg Hillier
(Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
25 February 2010
For answer on
1 March 2010
Answered on
11 March 2010
The National Identity Scheme Management Board and its professional advisers concluded that a competition was required to find partners to help provide the services set out in tender notice 2009/S 247-354963. They advised the Secretary of State for the Home Department accordingly.
Subjects
Contracts; Identity and Passport Service
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
507 c449W; 319964
House
House of Commons
To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills whether he has had discussions with the Secretary of State for the Home Department on the suitability of Post Office Ltd as a bidder for the contract set out in tender notice 2009/S 247-354963.
To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills whether he has had discussions with the Secretary of State for the Home Department on the suitability of Post Office Ltd as a bidder for the contract set out in tender notice 2009/S 247-354963.
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answered by
Pat McFadden
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
25 February 2010
For answer on
1 March 2010
Answered on
9 March 2010
The Government are keen for the Post Office to expand its Government services work. One of the major new opportunities in this area is for post offices to act as centres for the capture of biometric data for passports, driving licences, and potentially ID cards. This issue has been actively considered within Government and the Post Office is expected to bid to be a service provider. The Post Office agreed a deal last year with the DVLA to provide a "one-stop" biometric data capture facility at 750 branches around the country and is therefore well placed to provide similar services.
Subjects
Post offices
Date
9 March 2010
Reference
507 c287-8W; 319961
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he made an assessment of the merits of incorporating the specification for the Check and Send service in the requirements of the Identity and Passport Service tender notice for the procurement of front-office identity services.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he made an assessment of the merits of incorporating the specification for the Check and Send service in the requirements of the Identity and Passport Service tender notice for the procurement of front-office identity services.
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answered by
Meg Hillier
(Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
25 February 2010
For answer on
1 March 2010
Answered on
5 March 2010
The following statement was made in the Official Journal of European Union (OJEU) Notice with regards to Front Office Services:""IPS seeks expressions of interest from Service Providers for securing concessions to provide Front Office Services (FOS) to members of the public in connection with identity products issued by IPS and other government departments. These services may subsume the "Check & Send" assisted application process for UK passports.""This gives the agency the option to include the "Check and Send" service as part of the Front Office Services if deemed appropriate after further discussion with the suppliers down selected at the Pre-Qualification Questionnaire (PQQ) stage.
Subjects
Contracts; Identity and Passport Service
Date
5 March 2010
Reference
506 c1503W; 319962
House
House of Commons
That this House welcomes Vote Cruelty Free, a new coalition working to ensure the political process reflects concern for animal protection; notes that the coalition comprises the BUAV, Compassion in World Farming, International Fund for Animal Welfare, League Against Cruel Sports and Respect for Animals and covers a wide range of animal welfare issues; and calls on all prospective Parliamentary candidates to support this coalition.
That this House welcomes Vote Cruelty Free, a new coalition working to ensure the political process reflects concern for animal protection; notes that the coalition comprises the BUAV, Compassion in World Farming, International Fund for Animal Welfare, League Against Cruel Sports and Respect for Animals and covers a wide range...
Primary sponsor
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Subjects
Animal welfare; Elections
Date
26 November 2009
Reference
273
House
House of Commons
To ask the Prime Minister, if he will list his official engagements for Wednesday 11 November.
To ask the Prime Minister, if he will list his official engagements for Wednesday 11 November.
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Tabled
Tabled on
5 November 2009
For answer on
11 November 2009
Date
5 November 2009
Reference
299033
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on prisoner release decisions.
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on prisoner release decisions.
Lead member
Nick Palmer
Answering member
Maria Eagle
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Adjournment debates
Subjects
Chronic illnesses; Life imprisonment; Prisoners' release; Standards; al Megrahi, Abdelbasit Ali Mohmed
Date
20 October 2009
Reference
497 c201-22WH
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
House
House of Commons
In Broxtowe, we are delighted with the £500,000 that we have received to support the council house building programme. We are particularly delighted that the Government have shown that they are willing to support the building industry, which tends to be the hardest hit in periods such as this. Will my hon. Friend tell his colleagues in the Department that we hope that that support will not be a one-off and that we will see continuing support over the next 12 months?
In Broxtowe, we are delighted with the £500,000 that we have received to support the council house building programme. We are particularly delighted that the Government have shown that they are willing to support the building industry, which tends to be the hardest hit in periods such as this. Will my hon. Friend tell his colleagues in the Department that we hope that that support will not be a one-off and that we will see continuing support over the next 12 months?
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answering body
East Midlands Regional Grand Committee
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
9 September 2009
My hon. Friend is right, and I thank him for his congratulations. One of my jobs as regional Minister is to stand up for the region in the corridors of Whitehall and to be an advocate for it, so that it gets inward investment and support from a variety of Departments, including the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, the Department for Communities and Local Government and the Department for Children, Schools and Families, which can provide the investment that we need in skills, job support, housing and other infrastructure projects.
The regional economic strategy is the core document, which helps us to plan the way forward. I certainly intend to listen to businesses and local organisations, as I have been doing with colleagues on the regional economic cabinet. I intend to convey their views, to win resources and then to bear down on local deliverers, such as Jobcentre Plus and the learning and skills council, to ensure that resources are made available to the communities and individuals that need them.
Subjects
Business; Credit; Finance; Insurance; Government assistance; East Midlands; Motor vehicles; Manufacturing industries; Capital for Enterprise
Date
9 September 2009
Reference
EMRGC c5-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons Grand Committees
House
House of Commons
I thank the Minister for his response. Like him, I think that there is a balance to be struck.
There are two points. First, does the Minister accept that national, or regional, Government have a responsibility to ensure that there is a network? Travellers can reasonably say that they want to get from A to B with authorised stopping points along the way. A local council cannot ensure that that is the case on its own.
Secondly, we have found locally that the current powers make it slow and expensive for a landowner to get an eviction order, even when it is perfectly clear that the Travellers are there without permission. Will the Minister raise with his ministerial colleagues the question whether the police should be empowered to evict larger groups of Travellers, if those Travellers cannot show that they have permission to be on that site? Rather than the onus being on the landowner to go to court to get the eviction order, which might cost thousands of pounds, the onus would be on the people who are on the land to show that they have a right to be there.
I thank the Minister for his response. Like him, I think that there is a balance to be struck.
There are two points. First, does the Minister accept that national, or regional, Government have a responsibility to ensure that there is a network? Travellers can reasonably say that they want to get from A to B with authorised stopping points along the way. A local council cannot ensure that that is the case on its own.
Secondly, we have found locally that the current powers make it slow and expensive for a landowner to get an eviction order, even when it is perfectly clear that the Travellers are there without permission. Will the Minister raise with his ministerial colleagues the question whether the police should be empowered to evict larger groups of Travellers, if those Travellers cannot show that they have permission to be on that site? Rather than the onus being on the landowner to go to court to get the eviction order, which might cost thousands of pounds, the onus would be on the people who are on the land to show that they have a right to be there.
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answering body
East Midlands Regional Grand Committee
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
9 September 2009
I will convey to my colleagues in whichever part of Whitehall is responsible—it may be more than one part, as my hon. Friend has mentioned the police and local government—that joining-up action at a local level makes all the difference. I will also convey my hon. Friend’s concerns about how planning powers may be used.
I re-emphasise that the regional spatial strategy identifies the need for more pitches. It has stated in which local authority areas those should be, but it is for the local authority areas to decide where the pitches should be located. There are also opportunities and encouragement for local authorities—particularly where Travellers and Gypsies move between neighbouring authorities—to work together to develop a co-ordinated approach.
In my county, Northamptonshire, there is a very good working partnership between local authorities, the police, social services, and the education departments to ensure that a Traveller unit is co-funded by a number of organisations, districts and county councils. That provides a service to ensure that when difficulties arise for either the settled community or the travelling community, they are resolved quickly with everyone’s consent. Such practical action by local authorities is the key to resolving the dilemmas that sometimes frustrate local communities.
Subjects
Caravan sites; East Midlands; Travellers
Date
9 September 2009
Reference
EMRGC c8-9
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons Grand Committees
House
House of Commons
Care Homes (Domestic Pets). Ten minute rule motion for leave to introduce a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading. (Bill 129 2008-09). To be read a second time on 16 October.
Care Homes (Domestic Pets). Ten minute rule motion for leave to introduce a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading. (Bill 129 2008-09). To be read a second time on 16 October.
Lead member
Nick Palmer
Type
Debates on bills
Legislative stage
First reading
Procedure
Private members' bills proceedings; Ten minute rule motions
Legislation
Care Homes (Domestic Pets) Bill 2008-09
Subjects
Animal welfare; Care homes; Older people; Pets; Sheltered housing
Date
8 July 2009
Reference
495 c989-91
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many generic licences issued under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 are in operation; how many designated establishments hold such licences; how many generic licences were extant in (a) 2007 and (b) 2008; how many procedures were conducted under...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many generic licences issued under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 are in operation; how many designated establishments hold such licences; how many generic licences were extant in (a) 2007 and (b) 2008; how many procedures were conducted under...
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answered by
Alan Campbell
(Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
2 June 2009
For answer on
4 June 2009
Answered on
11 June 2009
For the purposes of this question we have taken 'generic licences' to refer to thematic licences issued for the testing for regulatory purposes of specific classes of test materials in line with specified regulatory requirements. The Home Office does not record information on such licences separately, but we have carried out a special exercise to extract the information requested. We estimate that there are currently 71 'generic licences' extant and that there were 67 at 31 December 2008 and 65 at 31 December 2007. The annual statistical return for 2007, the latest year for which figures are available, indicates 183,909 procedures were conducted during 2007 under the licences identified as generic that were in force at 31 December 2007.
Subjects
Animal experiments; Licensing
Date
11 June 2009
Reference
493 c933W; 278252
House
House of Commons
I welcome the Prime Minister's attack on the abuse of expenses that has so revolted members of the public, but will he also take action to curb the dependence of many Members on second incomes? I have calculated that the Conservative Front-Bench team alone has 57 other sources of income up to £250,000. Would it not be better if, instead of an alternative Government with 57 varieties of special interest, we all concentrated on the job that we were elected to do?
I welcome the Prime Minister's attack on the abuse of expenses that has so revolted members of the public, but will he also take action to curb the dependence of many Members on second incomes? I have calculated that the Conservative Front-Bench team alone has 57 other sources of income up to £250,000. Would it not be better if, instead of an alternative Government with 57 varieties of special interest, we all concentrated on the job that we were elected to do?
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
3 June 2009
All Members want to show that they are undertaking public service, and that they are in it not for what they can get but for what they can give. But one of the issues that repeatedly comes up is Members' second jobs, and it is right that Sir Christopher Kelly looks at the matter. [Interruption.] I hear some murmuring on the Opposition Benches. Methinks that they protest too much.
Subjects
Members' interests
Date
3 June 2009
Reference
493 c273
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answered by
Gordon Brown
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Answered on
3 June 2009
Notes
Lead question not printed.
Subjects
Members' interests
Date
3 June 2009
Reference
493 c273; 277575
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for that reply. I have read the brochure that the Department circulated with great interest, and it is helpful. However, I am sure that my right hon. Friend agrees that there is some difficulty with the substantial overlap between the symptoms of normal flu and those of swine flu. What would she recommend that my constituents do if they seem to have a severe case of what may well be normal flu? Should they go to their GP, ring a helpline or wait and see?
I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for that reply. I have read the brochure that the Department circulated with great interest, and it is helpful. However, I am sure that my right hon. Friend agrees that there is some difficulty with the substantial overlap between the symptoms of normal flu and those of swine flu. What would she recommend that my constituents do if they seem to have a severe case of what may well be normal flu? Should they go to their GP, ring a helpline or wait and see?
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
12 May 2009
What I would say to my hon. Friend and, in particular, to anybody who has been following the media coverage is that either there has to be contact with somebody who has travelled to Mexico or the person affected has to have travelled to Mexico. They should then phone for advice, from either their GP, NHS Direct or the flu service line.
Subjects
Disease control; Swine flu
Date
12 May 2009
Reference
492 c674
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
What his most recent assessment is of the level of risk posed to public health by the current outbreak of swine influenza.
What his most recent assessment is of the level of risk posed to public health by the current outbreak of swine influenza.
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Primarolo
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Tabled on
6 May 2009
For answer on
12 May 2009
Answered on
12 May 2009
It is hard to assess the risk posed by swine flu as the clinical picture remains unclear. There are some indications that the virus may cause only mild symptoms, and that, in some cases, people have recovered without antivirals. However, an overall prognosis for the impact of the virus is still difficult to determine at present and it is still too early for confident predictions about the possible severity of the flu in the United Kingdom.
Subjects
Disease control; Swine flu
Date
12 May 2009
Reference
492 c673-4; 274106
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
We also have the impression locally that the position is improving somewhat, but does the Chancellor agree that public support for the rescue of the banks is very much conditional on the banks' willingness to support the rest of the economy? Will he be doing all he can to ensure that our colleagues in the newly nationalised banks are aware of that public feeling?
We also have the impression locally that the position is improving somewhat, but does the Chancellor agree that public support for the rescue of the banks is very much conditional on the banks' willingness to support the rest of the economy? Will he be doing all he can to ensure that our colleagues in the newly nationalised banks are aware of that public feeling?
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
28 April 2009
I agree with my hon. Friend; the reason why we decided to intervene to restructure and rebuild the banking sector was the need to ensure that credit keeps flowing—that is vital for business. RBS will lend an additional £25 billion this year and next, the Lloyds group an additional £14 billion this year and next, and the figure for Northern Rock will be about £5 billion, which mainly relates to mortgages. Even the banks in which we do not have a stake have benefited from the support that we have given: HSBC has said that it will lend another £15 billion, while Barclays will lend another £11 billion this year. That money will be made available—although obviously it is important that we do everything that we can to ensure that credit keeps flowing—and will complement the measures that I announced in the Budget last week that are specifically designed to help businesses.
Subjects
Banks; Loans
Date
28 April 2009
Reference
491 c684
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
What recent assessment he has made of the trends in lending by UK banks to businesses.
What recent assessment he has made of the trends in lending by UK banks to businesses.
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Darling of Roulanish
(Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Tabled on
22 April 2009
For answer on
28 April 2009
Answered on
28 April 2009
The Bank of England published a new report on lending just last week. It suggests that some lenders expect the overall availability of credit to the corporate sector to improve over the coming months.
Subjects
Banks; Loans
Date
28 April 2009
Reference
491 c684; 271128
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Does not the Home Secretary agree that there is a distinction to be drawn between people who have come under reasonable suspicion but for one reason or another are not prosecuted, and instances such as the one we heard about earlier from the Opposition Benches, in which there is a clear case of mistaken identity? Nobody suggests that the other police records of suspects, such as interviews and evidence, should be destroyed just because the suspect is not charged. Does she not agree that a reasonable course of action would be to have an independent body—not the police—that can be appealed to and which can see whether there is a clear case of mistaken identity and whether the person's DNA ought to be removed?
Does not the Home Secretary agree that there is a distinction to be drawn between people who have come under reasonable suspicion but for one reason or another are not prosecuted, and instances such as the one we heard about earlier from the Opposition Benches, in which there is a clear case of mistaken identity? Nobody suggests that the other police records of suspects, such as interviews and evidence, should be destroyed just because the suspect is not charged. Does she not agree that a reasonable course of action would be to have an independent body—not the police—that can be appealed to and which can see whether there is a clear case of mistaken identity and whether the person's DNA ought to be removed?
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
23 March 2009
My hon. Friend is engaging seriously with the difficult issues involved in this debate. It is important to put it on record that the entry of a profile on the DNA database does not cause any detriment to an individual in seeking to do a particular job or looking for clearance for anything, for example. In that way, it is very different from having a police record. I think people are sometimes unclear about that distinction. My hon. Friend makes an important point about the blanket approach taken to retention. That is why in the consultation and proposals we will bring forward, we will look at a system of stepping down individuals over time in terms of the retention of their profile, and a differentiated approach, possibly based on age, risk or the nature of the offence involved.
Subjects
Databases; DNA
Date
23 March 2009
Reference
490 c9
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Will my right hon. Friend address the possibility of the electrification of the midland main line? As he will know from his experience of commuting to London, we are somewhat the poor relation. We were pleased to see that identified as a possibility in recent Government soundings. Can he give us more information on when we might know more about the timetable for that?
Will my right hon. Friend address the possibility of the electrification of the midland main line? As he will know from his experience of commuting to London, we are somewhat the poor relation. We were pleased to see that identified as a possibility in recent Government soundings. Can he give us more information on when we might know more about the timetable for that?
Asked by
Nick Palmer
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
10 March 2009
I share my hon. Friend's view. It is important, as I set out on 15 January, that we look at capacity questions on our network, including a consideration of electrifying the Great Western main line as well as the midland main line, which serves his constituency. I anticipate that I will receive further reports about that later this year and will make an appropriate statement to the House.
Subjects
Construction; High speed trains; Railways
Date
10 March 2009
Reference
489 c145
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons