1-20 of 1,119 results for primarymember:"Peter Kyle"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.476 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.006 seconds
- Search query
- primarymember:"Peter Kyle"
- We searched for
- primaryMember_ses:415354
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
Committee stage second day. Clause 52 debated with amendments, clauses and new clauses. Clause 52 amendment 7 withdrawn. Clauses 52 to 57 agreed to. Clause 58 amendment 20 negatived on division (90 to 290). Clauses 58 to 64 agreed to. New clause NC12 negatived on division (94 to 297). New clause NC4 negatived on division (157 to 287). Bill reported without amendment. The Deputy Speaker resumed the Chair. The Deputy Speaker reported an error in Division No. 13 on the Question relating to New Clause NC2 in proceedings on Committee of the whole House on the Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill, announced on 9 June. The correct number of Noes should read 251, instead of 257. Third reading. Agreed to on question. Bill passed.
Committee stage second day. Clause 52 debated with amendments, clauses and new clauses. Clause 52 amendment 7 withdrawn. Clauses 52 to 57 agreed to. Clause 58 amendment 20 negatived on division (90 to 290). Clauses 58 to 64 agreed to. New clause NC12 negatived on division (94 to 297). New...
Second reading. Reasoned amendment negatived on division (68 to 242). Main question agreed to. Programme motion on committal, proceedings in Committee of the Whole House, consideration and third reading, programming committee and other proceedings. Agreed to on question. Money resolution. King's recommendation signified. Agreed to on question. Ways and means resolution. Agreed to on question.
Second reading. Reasoned amendment negatived on division (68 to 242). Main question agreed to. Programme motion on committal, proceedings in Committee of the Whole House, consideration and third reading, programming committee and other proceedings. Agreed to on question. Money resolution. King's recommendation signified. Agreed to on question. Ways and means...
King's speech debate (third day) on Backing business to create economic growth.
King's speech debate (third day) on Backing business to create economic growth.
Presentation and first reading (Bill 10).
Presentation and first reading (Bill 10).
Business and Trade Questions
The following extracts are from Business and Trade Questions on 12 March 2026.
Of course, I will always welcome the fact that Scotland punches above its weight, whether it be industries abroad or investment in Scotland. Indeed, under the SNP, foreign direct investment has been higher in Scotland...
Business and Trade Questions
The following extracts are from Business and Trade Questions on 12 March 2026.
Of course, I will always welcome the fact that Scotland punches above its weight, whether it be industries abroad or investment in Scotland. Indeed, under the SNP, foreign direct investment has been higher in Scotland...
Statement on industrial energy costs.
Statement on industrial energy costs.
Statement on the Government's steel strategy.
Statement on the Government's steel strategy.
Presentation and first reading (Bill 321).
Presentation and first reading (Bill 321).
Consideration of Lords amendments. The Deputy Speaker announced that Lords Amendments 66, 88, 90, 91 and 101 engaged financial privilege. Lords Amendment 1. Disagreed to on division (326 to 160). Lords Amendment 7. Disagreed to on division (330 to 158). Lords Amendment 8. Disagreed to on division (316 to 172). Lords Amendment 23. Disagreed to on division (329 to 163). Lords Amendment 46 disagreed to on division (314 to 178). Lords Amendment 47 disagreed to on division (327 to 164). Lords Amendment 48 disagreed to on division (328 to 160). Lords Amendment 49 disagreed to on division (332 to 160). Lords Amendment 60 disagreed to on division (318 to 170). Lords Amendment 61 disagreed to on division (330 to 160). Lords Amendment 62 disagreed to on division (330 to 161). Lords Amendment 121 disagreed to on division (316 to 161). Lords Amendment 22, amendments (a) and (b) agreed to. Lords Amendment 22, as amended, agreed to. Lords Amendment 21 disagreed to. Amendments (a) and (b) agreed to in lieu of Lords Amendment 21. Lords Amendment 106 disagreed to. Amendment (a) made to the words restored to the Bill by the disagreement to Lords Amendment 106. Lords Amendments 107 to 120 disagreed to. Lords amendment 72 disagreed to. Lords Amendments 2 to 6, 9 to 20, 24 to 45, 50 to 59, 63 to 71, 73 to 105 and 122 with Commons privilege waived in respect of Lords Amendments 66, 88, 90, 91 and 101. Agreed to on question. Reasons to be assigned to the Lords for disagreeing to their Amendments 1, 7, 8, 23, 107 to 120, 46 to 49, 60 to 62, 72 and 121. Agreed to on question. Reasons to be reported and communicated to the Lords.
Consideration of Lords amendments. The Deputy Speaker announced that Lords Amendments 66, 88, 90, 91 and 101 engaged financial privilege. Lords Amendment 1. Disagreed to on division (326 to 160). Lords Amendment 7. Disagreed to on division (330 to 158). Lords Amendment 8. Disagreed to on division (316 to 172)....
Consideration of Lords message. Lords amendment 49D, disagreed to on division (195 to 124). Motion that a Committee be appointed to draw up Reasons to be assigned to the Lords for disagreeing to their amendments. Agreed to on question. Reasons to be reported and communicated to the Lords.
Consideration of Lords message. Lords amendment 49D, disagreed to on division (195 to 124). Motion that a Committee be appointed to draw up Reasons to be assigned to the Lords for disagreeing to their amendments. Agreed to on question. Reasons to be reported and communicated to the Lords.
Report stage. Government new clauses 16 and 17 discussed with amendments to clauses and new clauses. Government new clauses 16 to 17 agreed to. Government amendments to clauses 4, 8, 11, 15, 21, 23, 25, 56 to 59, 135, schedule 11 and title agreed to. New clause 1 negatived to on division (76 to 295). New clause 2 negatived to on division (88 to 287). New clause 19 negatived to on division (160 to 294). New clause 21 negatived to on division (97 to 363). Third reading. Agreed to on question. Bill passed with amendments.
Report stage. Government new clauses 16 and 17 discussed with amendments to clauses and new clauses. Government new clauses 16 to 17 agreed to. Government amendments to clauses 4, 8, 11, 15, 21, 23, 25, 56 to 59, 135, schedule 11 and title agreed to. New clause 1 negatived to...
The Government are working to develop a world-leading science and technology skills base that will drive economic growth and opportunity for all. We are committed to expanding access and participation in science and technology education, and we are partnering with universities to build the skills and workforce across the United Kingdom.
The Government are working to develop a world-leading science and technology skills base that will drive economic growth and opportunity for all. We are committed to expanding access and participation in science and technology education, and we are partnering with universities to build the skills and workforce across the United Kingdom.
This Prime Minister has delivered the AI opportunities action plan; this Prime Minister is deploying AI technology and productivity tools across Government; and this Prime Minister has brought in £30 billion in investment into digital and AI infrastructure since taking office. At the same time, this Prime Minister is sorting out the mess left after 14 years of Tory rule.
Second reading. Agreed to on question. Programme motion. Agreed to on question. Money resolution. King's recommendation signified. Agreed to on question. Ways and means resolution. Agreed to on question.
Second reading. Agreed to on question. Programme motion. Agreed to on question. Money resolution. King's recommendation signified. Agreed to on question. Ways and means resolution. Agreed to on question.
Statement on the Government’s AI opportunities action plan.
Statement on the Government’s AI opportunities action plan.
Motion that this House has considered technology in public services. Motion lapsed.
Motion that this House has considered technology in public services. Motion lapsed.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the cost was of the early exit from the lease for the Rosalind Franklin Laboratory.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the cost was of the early exit from the lease for the Rosalind Franklin Laboratory.
The figures were released on Monday 21st May 2024 and are included in the link below:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ukhsa-spend-over-25000-2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, pursuant to the Answer of 22 February 2024 on Government Departments: Artificial Intelligence, whether the detailed policy for the Algorithmic transparency recording standard has been agreed across all departments; and whether he has a planned timeline for compliance.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, pursuant to the Answer of 22 February 2024 on Government Departments: Artificial Intelligence, whether the detailed policy for the Algorithmic transparency recording standard has been agreed across all departments; and whether he has a planned timeline for compliance.
We are implementing the mandatory rollout of the ATRS in phases, with the current, first phase focusing on the 16 largest ministerial departments, plus HMRC.
The Department of Science, Innovation and Technology and the Central Digital and Data Office are working with these departments to map their in-scope algorithmic tools and draft their first ATRS records accordingly. These departments have now all reviewed a draft version of the scope and exemptions policy. We expect to circulate a finalised version of the policy by the end of May.
Regarding timelines for the wider rollout, expect these Phase One departments to publish their first ATRS records by the end of July. Departments finding no tools in scope will be required to submit a nil return. This will be followed by the next phase which involves extending the mandatory rollout to the remaining ministerial departments, and relevant arm’s-length bodies, from July onwards which the Central Digital and Data Office will monitor.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 7 May 2024 to Question 24269 on Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, which (a) NHS trusts have and (b) imaging network has not received funding.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 7 May 2024 to Question 24269 on Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, which (a) NHS trusts have and (b) imaging network has not received funding.
Since the initial announcements regarding funding for National Health Service trusts to integrate artificial intelligence into lung cancer imaging, adjustments have been made to the list of participants. Three trusts have withdrawn from the initiative, and five additional trusts have been onboarded, due to the inclusion of a new imaging network. As a result, as set out in the answer of 7 May 2024, there are now 66 trusts across 12 imaging networks that are participating in this initiative.
In the answer of 7 May 2024, 63 out of 66 trusts, in 11 of 12 imaging networks, had received funding. It is now confirmed that all 66 trusts in the 12 imaging networks participating have received or are in the process of receiving funding. These trusts are currently implementing artificial intelligence technologies to enhance diagnostic capabilities in lung cancer, consistent with the Government's commitment to advancing healthcare technology across the NHS.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, pursuant to the Answer of 22 April 2024 to Question 22348 on Public Expenditure, what his planned timetable is for publishing the response to David Willetts’ report.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, pursuant to the Answer of 22 April 2024 to Question 22348 on Public Expenditure, what his planned timetable is for publishing the response to David Willetts’ report.
DSIT published the response to Lord Willetts’ independent review of the DSIT business case and approvals process on 1 May on gov.uk: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reforming-the-dsit-business-case-process
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether the AI Safety Institute plans to carry out testing on the societal impacts of AI on elections.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether the AI Safety Institute plans to carry out testing on the societal impacts of AI on elections.
The AI Safety Institute has responsibility for developing and conducting evaluations on advanced AI systems, including assessing potentially harmful capabilities. As part of this, it will evaluate the direct impact of advanced AI systems on individuals and society - including how people are affected by interacting with these systems and the ways AI systems are being used in both private and professional contexts. Part of this work will explore the impacts of frontier AI on democracy, including elections. The Institute is collaborating on this with key partners in the UK ecosystem – initially with the Alan Turing Institute.
The Government takes the integrity and security of our democratic processes very seriously and is working to ensure we are ready to respond to the full range of threats to our democratic processes, including through the Defending Democracy Taskforce.