1-20 of 370 results for primarymember:"Ruth Kelly"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.348 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- primarymember:"Ruth Kelly"
- We searched for
- primaryMember_ses:301584
Type
-
Early day motions (5)
+
Members' contributions (18)
+
Oral questions (18)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
+
Parliamentary committees (5)
+
Committee proceedings (5)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
European Committee proceedings (4)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (112)
+
Debates (18)
-
Adjournment debates (2)
-
Budget debates (2)
+
Committee proceedings (5)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
European Committee proceedings (4)
+
Legislative debates (9)
-
Debates on bills (8)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
+
Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
+
Formal proceedings (11)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (11)
+
Petitions and observations (66)
-
Observations on petitions (66)
+
Statements (15)
+
Oral statements (15)
-
Ministerial statements (14)
+
Written corrections (1)
-
Ministerial corrections (1)
+
Parliamentary questions (253)
+
Oral questions (18)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Written questions (235)
+
Petitions and observations (66)
-
Observations on petitions (66)
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families which local authorities (a) ensure that the full £100 Child Trust Fund annual payments for looked-after children are put in their individual account and (b) have used all or part of these payments for other purposes.
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families which local authorities (a) ensure that the full £100 Child Trust Fund annual payments for looked-after children are put in their individual account and (b) have used all or part of these payments for other purposes.
Asked by
Ruth Kelly
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Primarolo
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
10 March 2010
For answer on
17 March 2010
Answered on
25 March 2010
[holding answer 17 March 2010]: Information about annual £100 Child Trust Fund top-up payments made by local authorities to the accounts of individual looked after children who are eligible is not collected centrally. Statutory guidance:"http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/everychildmatters/safeguarding andsocialcare/childrenincare/childtrustfund/childtrustfund/ ¹"on arrangements for the payment of Child Trust Funds was issued to local authorities in England under section 7 of the Local Authority Social Services Act 1970 which they must act under when performing their duties under section 22(3)(a) (duty to promote the welfare of a looked after child) of the Children Act 1989. The devolved administrations have also put guidance on the payment of Child Trust Funds in place."¹ Child Trust Fund Account Top Up Payments For Looked After Children: Statutory Guidance on Local Authority Practice in England."
Subjects
Children in care; Child trust fund
Date
25 March 2010
Reference
508 c561-2W; 322391
House
House of Commons
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the performance of stakeholder Child Trust Funds managed by the Official Solicitor or Accountant of Court on behalf of looked-after children.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the performance of stakeholder Child Trust Funds managed by the Official Solicitor or Accountant of Court on behalf of looked-after children.
Asked by
Ruth Kelly
(Labour)
Answered by
Sarah McCarthy-Fry
(Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
10 March 2010
For answer on
17 March 2010
Answered on
22 March 2010
[holding answer 17 March 2010]: The Child Trust Fund legislation provides that the Official Solicitor for England and Wales and the Official Solicitor for Northern Ireland manage the Child Trust Fund accounts of looked-after children where there is no one with parental responsibility. It is part of their duties to review the Child Trust Fund accounts under their control to ensure they continue to meet the best interests of the child.The Child Trust Fund legislation also provides that in Scotland the Accountant of Court manage these accounts. She is responsible to Scottish Ministers.
Subjects
Children in care; Child trust fund
Date
22 March 2010
Reference
508 c69W; 322392
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what percentage of Child Trust Funds managed by the Official Solicitor or Accountant of Court on behalf of looked-after children have been re-allocated to a different provider following concerns about investment performance.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what percentage of Child Trust Funds managed by the Official Solicitor or Accountant of Court on behalf of looked-after children have been re-allocated to a different provider following concerns about investment performance.
Asked by
Ruth Kelly
(Labour)
Answered by
Bridget Prentice
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
10 March 2010
For answer on
17 March 2010
Answered on
17 March 2010
15.12 per cent. of Child Trust Funds (969) managed by the Official Solicitor have been reallocated to a different provider following concerns about investment performance. At the time of the review of providers, the Official Solicitor acted as the registered contact for 6,076 children's Funds. To date, the Official Solicitor manages 6,406 Funds.
Subjects
Children in care; Child trust fund
Date
17 March 2010
Reference
507 c853W; 322393
House
House of Commons
I congratulate my right hon. Friend on his recent appointment as Transport Secretary, and I look forward to him dealing effectively but resolutely with all issues, particularly the need to secure more aviation capacity in the south-east. Does he agree that the problem is not just the local environmental impact of a potential new airport in the Thames estuary, but the lack of a substantial work force locally? Is it not fantasy politics to suggest that a Thames estuary airport could ever obviate the need for a third runway at Heathrow?
I congratulate my right hon. Friend on his recent appointment as Transport Secretary, and I look forward to him dealing effectively but resolutely with all issues, particularly the need to secure more aviation capacity in the south-east. Does he agree that the problem is not just the local environmental impact of a potential new airport in the Thames estuary, but the lack of a substantial work force locally? Is it not fantasy politics to suggest that a Thames estuary airport could ever obviate the need for a third runway at Heathrow?
Asked by
Ruth Kelly
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
21 October 2008
Let me take this opportunity to pay tribute to the excellent work completed by my right hon. Friend during her service in the Department for Transport. She was well respected within the Department and across the transport industry. I am grateful for her comments, not least because she displays a knowledge and understanding of the issues, which I hope in time to acquire, and which certainly far outstrips the rather feeble views set out so far by Opposition Front Benchers on such questions. Clearly they lack any consistent support from their Back Benchers, as we have seen recently. It is disappointing that they have not paid attention to the voice of British business on a question as vital as the future of the United Kingdom’s major airport. I hope that there is some principled reason for their position, but I suspect that there may not be.
Subjects
Construction; Airports; Environment protection; Greater London; Staff; London airports; South East; Kent
Date
21 October 2008
Reference
481 c145-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Statement on biofuels.
Statement on biofuels.
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Ministerial statements
Subjects
Climate change; Biofuels; Environment protection; Fossil fuels; Motor vehicles; Standards; Transport; Renewable energy
Date
7 July 2008
Reference
478 c1169-79
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Subjects
Closures; Driving tests; Offices; Wellingborough
Date
30 June 2008
Reference
478 c9-10P
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Subjects
Railways; Chilham
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
478 c4-6P
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Subjects
Disability; Bus services; Concessions; Kent; Pensioners; Transport
Date
23 June 2008
Reference
478 c1-2P
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Subjects
Closures; Driving tests; Location; Southend on Sea
Date
18 June 2008
Reference
477 c14-6P
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Subjects
Noise; Roads; Repairs and maintenance; Road traffic control; Staffordshire; A50
Date
18 June 2008
Reference
477 c13-4P
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Subjects
Safety; Roads; Road traffic control; A5; Flamstead
Date
17 June 2008
Reference
477 c11-2P
House
House of Commons
Statement on improving transport and tackling congestion in Greater Manchester
Statement on improving transport and tackling congestion in Greater Manchester
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Ministerial statements
Subjects
Cars; Fees and charges; Greater Manchester; Local government finance; Public transport; Public expenditure; Transport; Road traffic; Road traffic control; Tolls
Date
9 June 2008
Reference
477 c22-34
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Subjects
Safety; Roads; Road traffic control; Hertfordshire; Hemel Hempstead
Date
4 June 2008
Reference
476 c27-8P
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Subjects
Cafes; Facilities; Railway stations; Public lavatories; Benfleet Station
Date
4 June 2008
Reference
476 c27P
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Subjects
Bus services; EU law; Tachographs; Dorset
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
475 c17-8P
House
House of Commons
Ruth Kelly: ...The M25 is a quite long way down the procurement process on sections 1 and 3. [Official Report, 4 March 2008, Vol. 472, c. 1589.] Letter of correction from Ruth Kelly: An error has been identified in an answer given by the Secretary of State to the hon....
Ruth Kelly: ...The M25 is a quite long way down the procurement process on sections 1 and 3. [Official Report, 4 March 2008, Vol. 472, c. 1589.] Letter of correction from Ruth Kelly: An error has been identified in an answer given by the Secretary of State to the hon....
Member
Ruth Kelly
(Labour)
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Ministerial corrections
Subjects
Motorways; M25
Date
18 March 2008
Reference
473 c5MC
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Subjects
Pollution; Noise; Motorways; M25
Date
28 January 2008
Reference
471 c3-4P
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Subjects
Department for Transport; Railways; Kettering
Date
21 January 2008
Reference
470 c19-20P
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Subjects
Finance; Road traffic; Roads; Bypasses; Boston
Date
7 January 2008
Reference
470 c8P
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Subjects
Railways; Northampton
Date
17 December 2007
Reference
469 c6-8P;469 c8-10P
House
House of Commons