1-20 of 179 results for subject:"Acceptable behaviour contracts"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.429 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Acceptable behaviour contracts"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Acceptable behaviour contracts" OR subject_ses:434650
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
This briefing paper provides an overview of the remedies available to social landlords to deal with tenants who exhibit anti-social behaviour. The paper focuses on England but some of the same legislation applies in Wales. Scotland and Northern Ireland operate under different legislative regimes. The Home Office updated guidance for frontline professionals dealing with ASB in August 2019.
This briefing paper provides an overview of the remedies available to social landlords to deal with tenants who exhibit anti-social behaviour. The paper focuses on England but some of the same legislation applies in Wales. Scotland and Northern Ireland operate under different legislative regimes. The Home Office updated guidance for...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many acceptable behaviour contracts have been (a) agreed and (b) breached in the London Borough of Bexley in each year since their inception.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many acceptable behaviour contracts have been (a) agreed and (b) breached in the London Borough of Bexley in each year since their inception.
(2) how many acceptable behaviour contracts have been agreed in (a) Reading East constituency and (b) Berkshire in each year since the inception of such contracts;
(2) how many acceptable behaviour contracts have been agreed in (a) Reading East constituency and (b) Berkshire in each year since the inception of such contracts;
| Number | |
| 2003-04 | 6 |
| 2004-05 | 21 |
| 2005-06 | 2 |
| 2006-07 | 4 |
| 2007-08 | 5 |
| Total | 38 |
| Number of antisocial behaviour orders (ASBOs) issued to persons under 18-years of age at all courts¹ in the Thames Valley Criminal Justice System (CJS) area and the number proven in court to have been breached, in each year², 1 June 2000 to 31 December 2007 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thames Valley | 2000³ | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
| Issued (aged 10-17) | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 10 | 3 | 17 |
| Breached (all ages)4 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 6 | 26 | 32 | 31 | 22 |
| n/a = not available. | ||||||||
| ¹ This includes magistrates courts when acting both in their civil capacity issuing ASBOs on application and their criminal capacity when issuing ASBOs following conviction for a criminal offence. | ||||||||
| ² ASBOs may be breached more than once and in more than one year. In this table ASBOs breached are counted based on the year the first breach was proven in court. Many ASBOs which are breached in a particular year will have been issued in a previous year. | ||||||||
| ³ Age details of ASBO recipients available from 1 June 2000. Breach data are from 1 June 2000. | ||||||||
| 4 ASBOs can be issued in one CJS area and breached in another. In this table breaches are counted on area of issue. | ||||||||
| Breach data for 2000—02 are not available broken down by year. | ||||||||
| Notes: | ||||||||
| 1. Previously issued data have been revised. | ||||||||
| 2. ASBO breach data are compiled by matching records of ASBOs issued with ASBOs breached. The nature of this matching process means that previously published ASBO breach data are subject to minor revision. Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. | ||||||||
| Source (issued): | ||||||||
| As reported to the Home Office by the Court Service. | ||||||||
| Source (breached): | ||||||||
| Ministry of Justice Court Proceedings Database. | ||||||||
| Prepared by Justice Statistics Analytical Services. | ||||||||
| [Ref: ASBO 57-09, PQs 297557 and 297555]. |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many acceptable behaviour contracts have been made in (a) Staffordshire and (b) Tamworth constituency in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many acceptable behaviour contracts have been made in (a) Staffordshire and (b) Tamworth constituency in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many acceptable behaviour contracts have been made in (a) the London Borough of Enfield and (b) Enfield North constituency in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many acceptable behaviour contracts have been made in (a) the London Borough of Enfield and (b) Enfield North constituency in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) acceptable behaviour contracts and (b) antisocial behaviour orders were issued in Cleethorpes constituency in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) acceptable behaviour contracts and (b) antisocial behaviour orders were issued in Cleethorpes constituency in each of the last five years.
| Number of antisocial behaviour orders ISSUED at all courts in the Lincolnshire Criminal Justice System (CJS) area, as reported to the Home Office by the Court Service, 2002-06 | |
|---|---|
| Lincolnshire | |
| 2002 | 2 |
| 2003 | 7 |
| 2004 | 12 |
| 2005 | 20 |
| 2006 | 17 |
| Total | 58 |
| Note: | |
| Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. | |
| Prepared by CJEAU, Ministry of Justice. |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent estimate she has made of the breach rate of acceptable behaviour contracts issued to persons under 18 years of age in the latest period for which figures are available.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent estimate she has made of the breach rate of acceptable behaviour contracts issued to persons under 18 years of age in the latest period for which figures are available.
(2) how many acceptable behaviour contracts have been issued in (a) Barnsley East and Mexborough constituency, (b) Barnsley metropolitan borough and (c) Doncaster metropolitan borough since their inception.
(2) how many acceptable behaviour contracts have been issued in (a) Barnsley East and Mexborough constituency, (b) Barnsley metropolitan borough and (c) Doncaster metropolitan borough since their inception.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many acceptable behaviour contracts have been issued in (a) Easington constituency and (b) the County of Durham since their introduction; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many acceptable behaviour contracts have been issued in (a) Easington constituency and (b) the County of Durham since their introduction; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many acceptable behaviour contracts were issued in each of the last two years; and what proportion have been complied with.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many acceptable behaviour contracts were issued in each of the last two years; and what proportion have been complied with.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) acceptable behaviour orders and (b) parenting orders were issued in (i) Peterborough and (ii) Cambridgeshire in each year since their introduction; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) acceptable behaviour orders and (b) parenting orders were issued in (i) Peterborough and (ii) Cambridgeshire in each year since their introduction; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) acceptable behaviour contracts and (b) parenting orders were issued in (i) Reading, (ii) Wokingham and (iii) Berkshire in each year since their introduction.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) acceptable behaviour contracts and (b) parenting orders were issued in (i) Reading, (ii) Wokingham and (iii) Berkshire in each year since their introduction.
| Table A: Parenting orders related to youth offending or anti-social behaviour reported by Berkshire YOTs | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | 2001-02 | 2002-03 | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006-07 | |
| Bracknell Forest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reading and Wokingham | 7 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Slough | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| West Berkshire | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Windsor and Maidenhead | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 11 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 10 |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) acceptable behaviour contracts and (b) parenting orders have been issued in Cambridgeshire in each year since their introduction.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) acceptable behaviour contracts and (b) parenting orders have been issued in Cambridgeshire in each year since their introduction.
| Table A: Parenting orders related to youth offending or anti-social behaviour and non attendance reported by Cambridgeshire and Peterborough YOTs: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cambridgeshire YOT | Peterborough YOT | ||||
| Youth offending or anti-social behaviour | Non attendance where YOT involved | Youth offending or anti-social behaviour | Non attendance where YOT involved | Total | |
| 2000-01 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 2001-02 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 22 |
| 2002-03 | 4 | 0 | 13 | o | 17 |
| 2003-04 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 12 |
| 2004-05 | 2 | ¹— | 23 | ¹— | 25 |
| 2005-06 | 13 | ¹— | 22 | ¹— | 35 |
| 2006-07 | 8 | ¹— | 23 | ¹— | 31 |
| ¹ See table B. |
| Table B: Parenting orders made following truancy prosecution between 1 September 2004 and 13 April 2007 | |
|---|---|
| School year | Parenting orders for truancy |
| 2004-05 | 2 |
| 2005-06 | 0 |
| 2006-07 | 0 |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many acceptable behaviour contracts were (a) made and (b) breached in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many acceptable behaviour contracts were (a) made and (b) breached in each of the last five years.