Skip to main content

1-20 of 57 results for subject:"Agricultural Valuation Committee"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his explanation of the order. I will make a declaration of interest as a farmer, but I have no tenants.

The Minister can relax and be assured that we are happy to endorse the order. He will forgive me if I delay the Committee...

Member
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2014
Reference
753 cc349-350GC
House
House of Lords

Has the Minister any idea on cost savings to his department under the Public Bodies Bill to date? That would be most helpful.

Member
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2014
Reference
753 c351GC
House
House of Lords

I welcome this opportunity to introduce the order. It may be helpful if I explain why the Government have proposed to remove the Committee on Agricultural Valuation. The origins of the committee go back more than 60 years to the Agricultural Holdings Act 1948. On repeal of the 1948 Act,...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2014
Reference
753 cc348-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Grantchester, for his comments, and for his general support of the order to remove the Committee on Agricultural Valuation. As I said, this order removes what is effectively a moribund body that has not met for more than 20 years. Its removal...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2014
Reference
753 cc350-1GC
House
House of Lords

May I include that in the letter? On that basis, I commend this order to the Committee.

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2014
Reference
753 c351GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord De Mauley
Answering member
Lord Grantchester
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
7 April 2014
Reference
753 cc348-351GC
House
House of Lords

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
George Eustice
Answering member
Huw Irranca-Davies
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
First Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
31 March 2014
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee
Date
4 March 2014
Reference
HL 144 2013-14
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Secretary Owen Paterson
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Public body orders
Date
6 February 2014
Reference
SI 2014/1068
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

My Lords, the purpose of this amendment is to seek fully to understand and evaluate the rationale for including the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission in Schedule 1 and the reason for its conversion announced on 14 October back to an executive agency of the DWP. Noble Lords will be...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
723 c1055-8
House
House of Lords

No.

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
723 c1063
House
House of Lords

I shall speak also to Amendments 35, 36, 38 and 48, which are grouped with this one. Amendment 29 is in my name and that of the noble Baroness, Lady Quin, who apologises to the House that she cannot be present today. I declare my interest as a farmer in...

Member
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
723 c1079-81
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful to my noble friend Lord Young of Norwood Green for speaking. He made a significant point in saying that if the Government have not yet entirely made up their mind about abolition, this body should never have been included in Schedule 1. I do...

Member
Lord Borrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
723 c1090
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, for his amendment because it means that we have to look carefully at what we have said and what we are doing. With his background in the Office of Fair Trading and my experience of working with him over the years,...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
723 c1088-90
House
House of Lords

I shall respond to one particularly lengthy speech from my fellow Cumbrian, the noble Lord, Lord Clark of Windermere, who spoke at some length, allegedly about the Home Grown Timber Advisory Committee, although most of his remarks related to debates that we will have later on the Forestry Commission. Those...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
723 c1085
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I defer to no one in my admiration for the noble Lord, Lord Clark, for his distinguished period as chairman of the Forestry Commission. He has made a very powerful case for the role that forestry plays, whether in the public or the private sector. However, the question...

Member
Earl of Selborne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
723 c1084-5
House
House of Lords

Perhaps the coalitions in those days were a bit more radical than the current one. But we will let that lie. That advisory committee was a link in the new concept of state forestry—forestry belonging to the citizens—being challenged by and running side by side with the private forest interest....

Member
Lord Clark of Windermere (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
723 c1081-4
House
House of Lords

In a coalition Government.

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
723 c1081
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Competition Service, to which the amendment applies, is a very small cog in the wheel of competition policy, which this Government, the previous Government and most Governments over many years have regarded as a vital part of policy for the British economy. Competition is good for the...

Member
Lord Borrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
723 c1086-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, noble Lords will be relieved to hear that I do not propose detaining us for long, because my noble friend Lord Borrie has put the kernel of the case. I just want to make a couple of points. We are told that a working group is currently examining...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
723 c1088
House
House of Lords