Skip to main content

1-20 of 29 results for subject:"Associated Newspapers"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am repeating the following Written Ministerial Statement made today in the other place by my Right Honourable Friend, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, Lisa Nandy MP:

This is a joint statement made with the Secretary of State for the Home Department.

As Ministers with joint responsibility for...

Member
Baroness Twycross (Labour)
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written statements
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
HLWS531
House
House of Lords

This is a joint statement made with the Secretary of State for the Home Department.

As Ministers with joint responsibility for the Leveson Inquiry into the culture, practices, and ethics of the press, today under section 20(7) of the Inquiries Act 2005, we have decided to vary the restriction orders issued...

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written statements
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
HCWS535
House
House of Commons

This is a joint statement with the Secretary of State for the Home Department.

As Ministers with joint responsibility for the Leveson Inquiry into the culture, practices, and ethics of the press, today under section 20(7) of the Inquiries Act 2005, we have decided to vary the Final Restriction Order (FRO)...

Member
Lucy Frazer (Conservative)
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written statements
Date
1 March 2024
Reference
HCWS303
House
House of Commons

I am repeating the following Written Ministerial Statement made today in the other place by my Right Honourable Friend, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, Lucy Frazer KC MP:

This is a joint statement with the Secretary of State for the Home Department.

As Ministers with joint responsibility for...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written statements
Date
1 March 2024
Reference
HLWS297
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 17 October 2019 to Question 316, whether the graphics used in the six-week long advertising campaign entitled, Universal Credit Uncovered, in The Metro were designed by (a) staff in her Department or (b) Associated Newspapers.

Asked by
Ruth George (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 November 2019
Reference
7798
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether his Department (a) has made or (b) plans to make any policy changes in response to the decisions in Weller vs. Associated News in 2014.

Asked by
Helen Goodman (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 October 2014
Reference
210558
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the Draft Defamation Bill
Date
18 July 2011
Reference
HC 930-xiii 2010-12
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Culture, Media and Sport Committee
Date
6 March 2007
Reference
HC 375-i 2006-07
House
House of Commons

That this House notes that it is 10 days since Ken Livingstone, Mayor of London, made insulting remarks to an Evening Standard journalist; believes that, no matter how long or deep his dispute with Associated Newspapers is, that dispute cannot justify or excuse his language; recognises the offence felt by...

Primary sponsor
Andrew Dismore (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
22 February 2005
Reference
744; 744A1; 744A2
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Health Committee
Date
16 December 2004
Reference
HC 42-iii 2004/05
House
House of Commons

That this House condemns Associated Newspapers for paying up to ??100,00 to Nadir Abrahams and Brian Ebden for what has been shown to be a fabricated story about Sir Alex Ferguson, and which at the time was the subject of a police inquiry; notes reports that the Police were hampered...

Primary sponsor
Peter Bradley (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
15 October 2002
Reference
1752
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the Draft Communications Bill
Notes
Received 18.07.02
Date
25 July 2002
Reference
HC 876 2001/02;HL 169 2001/02
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the Draft Communications Bill
Date
4 July 2002
Reference
HC 876-ix 2001/02
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what was the cost met from public funds of the legal action taken by the previous Secretary of State, the Right honourable Member for North Tyneside, against Associated Newspapers. - Inc ref to 375 c6W, 19 November 2001.

Asked by
David Heathcoat-Amory (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 December 2001
Reference
376 c647W; 21668
House
House of Commons

To ask the Prime Minister, if he will investigate the circumstances surrounding the decision taken by the Right honourable Member for North Tyneside to expend departmental funds to pursue an action against Associated Newspapers and Simon and Schuster. - Inc ref to 376 c647W, 10 December 2001.

Asked by
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 December 2001
Reference
376 c624-5W; 21741
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, if she will make a statement on the action initiated by her predecessor against the Daily Mail in respect of comments made in that newspaper on 19th March; for what reason the action initiated was not pursued to the courts;...

Asked by
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 December 2001
Reference
376 c646W; 21740
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what the total solicitors' costs to her Department was of the Right honourable Member for North Tyneside's action against Associated Newspapers and Simon and Schuster. - Inc figure.

Asked by
Ben Chapman (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 November 2001
Reference
16391; 375 c6W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what was the cost met from public funds of the legal action taken by the previous Secretary of State, the Right honourable Member for North Tyneside, against Associated Newspapers.

Asked by
David Heathcoat-Amory (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 2001
Reference
10146; 373 c502W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, if he will make a statement on the costs and outcome of the advice given by departmental lawyers in respect of the allegations made in the Daily Mail on 19th March.

Asked by
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 2001
Reference
4301; 372 c587W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what the cost to public funds was of his recent legal action against Associated Newspapers, with special reference to the costs associated with work done by officials. - No bill for costs has yet been received (holding answer 2 May...

Asked by
David Heathcoat-Amory (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 May 2001
Reference
368 c305W; 160103
House
House of Commons