Skip to main content

1-20 of 20,605 results for subject:"Benefits rules"

Type

-
Early day motions (22)
+ Legislation (810) + Acts (18)
-
Public acts (18)
+ Bills (46) + Public bills (46)
-
Consolidation bills (6)
-
Government bills (13)
+ Private members' bills (27)
-
Ballot bills (2)
-
Presentation bills (14)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (3)
-
Ten minute rule bills (8)
+ Delegated legislation (746) + Statutory instruments (746)
-
Remedial orders (3)
+ Members' contributions (14,705)
-
Business questions (6)
-
Maiden speeches (10)
-
Oral answers to questions (616)
-
Oral question time interventions (19)
+ Oral questions (625)
-
Prime Minister's questions (38)
-
Topical questions (2)
-
Points of order (7)
-
Proceeding contributions (13,445)
+ Parliamentary committees (368) + Committee proceedings (254)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (5)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (13)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (75)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (117)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (25)
-
Select Committee reports (40)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (21)
-
Select Committee written evidence (70)
+ Parliamentary papers (462)
-
Command papers (46)
-
Consultation papers (15)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (5)
-
Deposited papers (255)
-
House of Commons papers (118)
-
House of Lords papers (10)
-
Impact assessments (19)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (1)
-
Treaties (2)
-
Unprinted command papers (4)
-
Unprinted papers (12)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (821) + Debates (561)
-
Adjournment debates (37)
-
Backbench debates (7)
-
Budget debates (3)
+ Committee proceedings (254)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (5)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (13)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (75)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (117)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (25)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
-
e-petition debates (2)
-
Emergency debate applications (1)
-
Emergency debates (2)
-
Estimates days (3)
+ Legislative debates (413)
-
Debates on bills (252)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (161)
+ Monarch's speech debates (2)
-
Queen's speech debates (2)
-
Opposition days (18)
-
Questions for short debate (15)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Petitions and observations (9)
-
Observations on petitions (4)
-
Paper petitions (5)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (201) + Oral statements (49)
-
Ministerial statements (47)
-
Select Committee statements (1)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (152)
-
Urgent questions (16)
+ Written corrections (6)
-
Ministerial corrections (5)
-
Other corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (4,380)
-
Business questions (6)
+ Oral questions (625)
-
Prime Minister's questions (38)
-
Topical questions (2)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (16)
-
Written questions (3,732)
+ Petitions and observations (9)
-
Observations on petitions (4)
-
Paper petitions (5)
+ Research briefings (66) + Commons Briefing papers (44)
-
Briefing papers on bills (3)
-
Constituency casework (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (14)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Debates (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (7)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (6)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motion to regret. Disagreed to on division (64 to 95).

Lead member
Baroness Stedman-Scott
Answering member
Baroness Sherlock
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858
House
House of Lords

May I start by saying how delighted I am to see the Minister in her place?

My Lords, these regulations make a significant change to the way in which personal independence payment awards are reviewed. They allow the Secretary of State to extend an existing fixed-term PIP award whenever Ministers consider...

Member
Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1188-1190
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak in favour of these regulations. Despite the case made by the noble Baroness, Lady Stedman-Scott, there was much in what she said about the purpose of reviews with which I agree: they are in the interests of the claimants and of the public, in that they...

Member
Lord Davies of Brixton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1190-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Davies, and to join the, I am sure, widespread view around the House in welcoming the continuing presence of the Minister, the noble Baroness, Lady Sherlock,

in her position. Personally, I consider that a delight, even though I...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1191-2
House
House of Lords

What is new?

Member
Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 c1192
House
House of Lords

If Hansard did not catch that, the comment from the Opposition Front Bench was, “What is new?”

I begin by making a very simple point. The way in which the outcomes of the reviews of all the payments we are discussing have been conducted, particularly the personal independence payments, are causing...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1192-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Bennett. I support the regret Motion tabled by my noble friend Lady Stedman-Scott for the reasons that she set out so clearly in her excellent introductory speech. But before I go into that, I too want to say...

Member
Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1193-4
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Baroness acknowledge that we should look at our society and ask why we might be suffering from higher levels of those conditions, and why people are not able to find a place in our society, as well as looking at biology?

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 c1194
House
House of Lords

I am sure the noble Baroness is right, and I thank her for that point. She has posed a very broad question, and I fear I would detain the House for much too long if I tried to answer it with the seriousness it definitely deserves.

I want to touch on...

Member
Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1194-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow my noble friend Lady Maclean of Redditch. I want to take a slightly a bigger picture view to explain why I support the Motion. My greatest fear, as a severely disabled person, is that the overall benefits bill, particularly the cost to...

Member
Lord Shinkwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1195-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we all recognise that the control of public spending matters. It is right that Governments examine whether money is being spent effectively and whether benefits are achieving the purpose for which they are intended, but that must not be the starting point for today’s debate.

It is about...

Member
Lord Palmer of Childs Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1196-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Stedman-Scott, for introducing her Motion. I am also grateful to all noble Lords for their contributions, and I appreciate their many kind words. If I had even a moment’s thought that they meant I would get away with anything at...

Member
Baroness Sherlock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1198-1201
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken, and I thank the Minister for her response. I agree completely with the noble Lord, Lord Palmer, that disabled people need to be treated with dignity and respect. On these Benches, we completely sign up to that. My noble friends...

Member
Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1201-2
House
House of Lords

My Right Honourable Friend, the Minister for State (Minister for Social Security and Disability) (The Rt Hon Sir Stephen Timms MP) has made the following written statement.

I am pleased to make this statement in relation to the Timms Review of Personal Independence Payment (PIP).

The Government has today published the Interim...

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written statements
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
HLWS216
House
House of Lords

I am pleased to make this statement in relation to the Timms Review of Personal Independence Payment (PIP).

The Government has today published the Interim Report on behalf of the steering group for the Timms Review. The Report is available on GOV.UK and copies will be placed in the Libraries of...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written statements
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
HCWS211
House
House of Commons

I. The Timms review of Personal Independence Payment: Interim Report. Incl. annex. 74p. II. Annex A: Terms of Reference. 3p. III. Annex B: Personal Independence Payment: evidence and analysis. 126p. IV. Annex C: List of themes and topics. 2p. V. Call for Evidence Findings Report. Incl. annexes. 35p.

Deposited by
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Deposited papers
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
DEP2026-0466
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Civil compensation is disregarded from pension credit entitlement calculations, but military compensation is not. I know that the new Minister for Veterans is sympathetic to addressing this injustice, so I wonder whether he would meet me and the family of Pauline Cole—a veteran who was fighting to address this matter—in order to put it right.

Asked by
Josh Babarinde (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
789 c23
House
House of Commons

I will meet with the hon. Gentleman and the family.

Answered by
Calvin Bailey (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
789 c23
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Andrew Western
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
25 June 2026
Reference
SI 2026/679
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Laid by
Sir Stephen Timms
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
25 June 2026
Reference
SI 2026/681
House
House of Commons; House of Lords