Skip to main content

1-20 of 20,619 results for subject:"Benefits rules"

Type

-
Early day motions (22)
+ Legislation (810) + Acts (18)
-
Public acts (18)
+ Bills (46) + Public bills (46)
-
Consolidation bills (6)
-
Government bills (13)
+ Private members' bills (27)
-
Ballot bills (2)
-
Presentation bills (14)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (3)
-
Ten minute rule bills (8)
+ Delegated legislation (746) + Statutory instruments (746)
-
Remedial orders (3)
+ Members' contributions (14,717)
-
Business questions (6)
-
Maiden speeches (10)
-
Oral answers to questions (616)
-
Oral question time interventions (19)
+ Oral questions (625)
-
Prime Minister's questions (38)
-
Topical questions (2)
-
Points of order (7)
-
Proceeding contributions (13,457)
+ Parliamentary committees (368) + Committee proceedings (254)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (5)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (13)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (75)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (117)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (25)
-
Select Committee reports (40)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (21)
-
Select Committee written evidence (70)
+ Parliamentary papers (463)
-
Command papers (46)
-
Consultation papers (15)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (5)
-
Deposited papers (256)
-
House of Commons papers (118)
-
House of Lords papers (10)
-
Impact assessments (19)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (1)
-
Treaties (2)
-
Unprinted command papers (4)
-
Unprinted papers (12)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (822) + Debates (562)
-
Adjournment debates (37)
-
Backbench debates (7)
-
Budget debates (3)
+ Committee proceedings (254)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (5)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (13)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (75)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (117)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (25)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
-
e-petition debates (2)
-
Emergency debate applications (1)
-
Emergency debates (2)
-
Estimates days (3)
+ Legislative debates (413)
-
Debates on bills (252)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (161)
+ Monarch's speech debates (2)
-
Queen's speech debates (2)
-
Opposition days (18)
-
Questions for short debate (15)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Petitions and observations (9)
-
Observations on petitions (4)
-
Paper petitions (5)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (201) + Oral statements (49)
-
Ministerial statements (47)
-
Select Committee statements (1)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (152)
-
Urgent questions (16)
+ Written corrections (6)
-
Ministerial corrections (5)
-
Other corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (4,380)
-
Business questions (6)
+ Oral questions (625)
-
Prime Minister's questions (38)
-
Topical questions (2)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (16)
-
Written questions (3,732)
+ Petitions and observations (9)
-
Observations on petitions (4)
-
Paper petitions (5)
+ Research briefings (66) + Commons Briefing papers (44)
-
Briefing papers on bills (3)
-
Constituency casework (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (14)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Debates (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (7)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (6)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion that this House has considered the potential merits of removing the qualifying period for Disability Living Allowance for children. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Michelle Welsh
Answering member
Lilian Greenwood
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
790 cc113-8WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the potential merits of removing the qualifying period for Disability Living Allowance for children.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Butler. It is right and fitting that I start this debate where it all began for me, with dear...

Member
Michelle Welsh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
790 c113WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Lady on securing the debate. It is debates such as this that remind us of our job as MPs. Does she agree that when a family receive a devastating diagnosis, whether that is of a terminal illness, a severe disability or an aggressive childhood cancer, the...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
790 c114WH
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree. Too often, the financial impacts of a cancer diagnosis are forgotten. People think about the hospital visits, the sickness and the endless tablets, but a disability or serious condition such as cancer has an impact on every single part of someone’s life. Following a diagnosis, families immediately...

Member
Michelle Welsh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
790 c114WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for her incredibly powerful speech. She is right that this is not a necessity; it can be addressed. Does she agree that the Department for Work and Pensions needs to ensure that parents get support from day one so that they can address...

Member
Rachael Maskell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
790 c115WH
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree. Cancer is actually one of the clearest diagnoses that someone can get from day one.

Cancer does not wait, yet families have to. The three-month qualifying period does not reflect the realities that families face. In Mabel’s case, the family were informed that they would not qualify for...

Member
Michelle Welsh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
790 c115WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member on securing this debate. Does she agree that there is a strong case for greater flexibility in rapidly diagnosed cases where a clinician has already identified a severe, serious and long-lasting condition, and that in such cases a qualifying period can be unnecessary, bureaucratic and...

Member
Alex Easton (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
790 c115WH
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. The bureaucratic system is failing families, but these issues could easily be resolved if medical evidence could be used instead of the qualifying period. I urge the Minister to look at ways in which medical evidence and research can be used in DLA to make the system better for...

Member
Michelle Welsh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
790 cc115-6WH
House
House of Commons

I am delighted to serve under your chairship, Ms Butler. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Sherwood Forest (Michelle Welsh) on securing this important debate. She has made a particularly valuable, thoughtful and passionate contribution this morning, and I join her in wishing Mabel, her mum Rachael and...

Member
Lilian Greenwood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
790 c116WH
House
House of Commons

If I have correctly understood what the Minister is saying, if a consultant, GP or other doctor sent a letter confirming that the condition started way before the application was made, that would be the qualifying period, and that would be done by a medical person. Am I reading it...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
790 c116WH
House
House of Commons

It starts with the issue of need. The point at which the child became eligible for disability living allowance marks the start of the qualifying period, even if that precedes the point at which parents make a claim. Understandably, when parents are in very difficult circumstances, their first thought is...

Member
Lilian Greenwood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
790 cc116-7WH
House
House of Commons

In the light of the fact that we are moving into a new era of a can-do Government, will the Minister look, together with clinicians, at the opportunity and benefit of delivering DLA from day one, and then bring the evidence back to the House?

Member
Rachael Maskell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
790 c117WH
House
House of Commons

I will perhaps come later in my speech to what the Government are planning to do.

I am pleased to tell colleagues that between October 2024 and March 2025, the Department recruited and redeployed in excess of 100 case managers to improve clearance times for child DLA new claims. Between 1...

Member
Lilian Greenwood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
790 cc117-8WH
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 30/07/2026 from Baroness Sherlock to Baroness Stedman-Scott regarding the Universal Credit, Personal Independence Payment, Jobseeker’s Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Decisions and Appeals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026: motion to regret: correction to a statement made during the debate. 1p.

Deposited by
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Deposited papers
Date
30 July 2026
Reference
DEP2026-0526
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to regret. Disagreed to on division (64 to 95).

Lead member
Baroness Stedman-Scott
Answering member
Baroness Sherlock
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858
House
House of Lords

May I start by saying how delighted I am to see the Minister in her place?

My Lords, these regulations make a significant change to the way in which personal independence payment awards are reviewed. They allow the Secretary of State to extend an existing fixed-term PIP award whenever Ministers consider...

Member
Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1188-1190
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak in favour of these regulations. Despite the case made by the noble Baroness, Lady Stedman-Scott, there was much in what she said about the purpose of reviews with which I agree: they are in the interests of the claimants and of the public, in that they...

Member
Lord Davies of Brixton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1190-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Davies, and to join the, I am sure, widespread view around the House in welcoming the continuing presence of the Minister, the noble Baroness, Lady Sherlock,

in her position. Personally, I consider that a delight, even though I...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1191-2
House
House of Lords

What is new?

Member
Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 c1192
House
House of Lords

If Hansard did not catch that, the comment from the Opposition Front Bench was, “What is new?”

I begin by making a very simple point. The way in which the outcomes of the reviews of all the payments we are discussing have been conducted, particularly the personal independence payments, are causing...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1192-3
House
House of Lords