Skip to main content

1-10 of 10 results for subject:"Bennett, Paul"

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Adjournment debate on Mr. John Haase and Mr. Paul Bennett, and the Royal prerogative.

Lead member
Peter Kilfoyle
Answering member
Maria Eagle
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
483 c693-704
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Liverpool, Walton (Mr. Kilfoyle) not only on securing the debate but on the extensive and assiduous way in which he has pursued this matter for at least 12 years. Anyone who has stood where I stand now during that time must be...

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
483 c700-4
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure, Madam Deputy Speaker, to be in the Chamber under your strict invigilation. I know that you will make sure that we stick to the subject in this amply timed debate, as it has turned out. It is a rather arcane subject for most people, but it...

Member
Peter Kilfoyle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
483 c693-700
House
House of Commons

Adjournment debate on the Royal Prerogative of Mercy.

Lead member
Peter Kilfoyle
Answering member
Paul Goggins
Department
Home Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
21 May 2004
Reference
421 c1277-84
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his Answer of 23 February 2004, 418 c250W, on royal pardons, whether the figure of one free pardon in 1996 refers to (a) both people in the case of John Haase and Paul Bennett and (b) one of...

Asked by
Peter Kilfoyle (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2004
Reference
419 c496W;419 c498W; 159972
House
House of Commons

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what investigations are planned into the activities of (a) John Haase, (b) Paul Bennett and (c) their handlers; when (a) Paul Bennett and (b) John Haase ceased to be registered informants; what reviews have been made of the convictions contingent upon the evidence...

Asked by
Peter Kilfoyle (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2001
Reference
368 c429W; 160386;160373;160388
House
House of Commons

If he will comment on the circumstances surrounding the procedural impropriety referred to by presiding Lord Justice Mann in the case of Mr Paul Bennett and the subsequent discontinuance of the committal proceedings; and if the services of Mr Paul Bennett were used or employed by any of the UKs...

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 March 1994
Reference
239 c781W
House
House of Commons

What representations he received from agencies of either the United States government or the United States prosecution or judicial authorities prior to committal proceedings against Mr Paul Bennett; & what representations he received from agencies of either the United States Government or the United States prosecution or judicial authorities prior...

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 1994
Reference
239 c739W
House
House of Commons

Which Minister signed in July 1992 the public immunity interest certificate in relation to the prosecution of Paul Bennett. - My rthon & learned Friend the then Home Secretary signed the certificate.

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 1994
Reference
239 c704W
House
House of Commons

Why a public immunity interest certificate was originally applied in the case of Paul Bennett; in what circumstances; and for what reason it was subsequently lifted.

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 1994
Reference
239 c739W
House
House of Commons