Skip to main content

1-20 of 368 results for subject:"Birt, Lord"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Public Administration Select Committee
Notes
Originally listed in the Vote as HC 45-ii, corrected on 23 February 2009.
Date
15 January 2009
Reference
HC 97-ii 2008-09
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster who occupies the office previously occupied by Lord Birt.

Asked by
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 July 2007
Reference
151416; 463 c657W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Prime Minister what assessment he has made of the contribution of Lord Birt in his role as special adviser.

Asked by
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
145045; 462 c12W
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Public Administration Select Committee
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
HC 756-iii 2005-06
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether the Chief Executive of the Shareholder Executive was asked to appoint Lord Birt to the board of Urenco.

Asked by
Alan Duncan (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 February 2006
Reference
53999; 443 c672W;443 c672W
House
House of Commons

I am sorry that the hon. Gentleman was not present two weeks ago, when this matter was raised, as he would have heard my comprehensive answer. Perhaps he could spend his time over the Christmas recess profitably by studying the Osmotherly rules, which set out very precisely the circumstances in...

Member
Geoffrey Hoon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2005
Reference
440 c997
House
House of Commons

Earlier this year, the Prime Minister told Parliament that special advisers should be made to attend Select Committees on exactly the same basis as civil servants, yet last month he blocked his own special adviser, Lord Birt, from attending the Select Committee on Public Administration. May we have an urgent...

Member
Grant Shapps (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
8 December 2005
Reference
440 c997
House
House of Commons

I am surprised that the right hon. Gentleman raises the issue in that way. He is usually rather more fair-minded about the approach that he takes to these issues. He will know that it is a long-standing aspect of the Osmotherley rules governing who may appear before Select Committees that...

Member
Geoffrey Hoon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2005
Reference
439 c1667
House
House of Commons

May we have an early debate in Government time on the Prime Minister’s refusal to allow Lord Birt to appear before a Select Committee of this House? Is it not an unacceptable restriction on our ability to hold the Executive to account for the Prime Minister to have a personal...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
24 November 2005
Reference
439 c1667
House
House of Commons

To ask the Prime Minister pursuant to the answer of 12 October 2005, Official Report, columns 662–63W, on Lord Birt, what measures were in place at the time of Lord Birt's employment with McKinsey.

Asked by
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 October 2005
Reference
20772; 437 c1299W;437 c1287W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Prime Minister what (a) personal attributes and (b) relevant experience of Lord Birt led him to put Lord Birt forward for the position of head of Urenco.

Asked by
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 October 2005
Reference
17336; 437 c662W;437 c668W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Prime Minister what mechanisms were in place to ensure Lord Birt did not have access to papers on Government policy where there may have been a conflict of interest with his role for McKinsey; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 October 2005
Reference
17349; 437 c662-3W;437 c668-9W
House
House of Commons

Which organisations and individuals the Lord Birt has met during his tenure as the Prime Minister’s strategy adviser.

Asked by
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 October 2005
Reference
1614; 674 c111WA
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster if he will make a statement on reports written by Lord Birt since his appointment as an adviser to the Prime Minister.

Asked by
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 October 2005
Reference
16809; 437 c422W;437 c428W
House
House of Commons

Whether arrangements are in place to ensure that when the Prime Minister’s Strategy Adviser, the Lord Birt, meets clients of McKinsey and Company Incorporated, any potential conflict of interest is avoided.

Asked by
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2005
Reference
878; 674 c44WA
House
House of Lords

Further to the letter of 5 October 2001 published by the Cabinet Office setting out the terms of the Lord Birt’s contract as the Prime Minister’s Strategy Adviser, whether McKinsey and Company, or any    employee or consultant of McKinsey and Company, (a) serviced, (b) gave evidence or (c) was asked to provide...

Asked by
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2005
Reference
1024; 674 c44WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they will list all items of correspondence between the Prime Minister’s Private Office and McKinsey and Company Incorporated since January 2001 relating to the Prime Minister’s Strategy Adviser, the Lord Birt.

Asked by
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2005
Reference
1274; 674 c46-7WA
House
House of Lords

Whether the Lord Birt has met the Director General of MI5 in his capacity as the Prime Minister’s Strategy Adviser.

Asked by
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2005
Reference
1179; 674 c45WA
House
House of Lords

Whether, since his appointment as the Prime Minister’s Strategy Adviser, the Lord Birt has met any official or employee of Ofcom acting in an official capacity.

Asked by
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2005
Reference
1180; 674 c45WA
House
House of Lords

Further to the letter of 5 October 2001 published by the Cabinet Office setting out the terms of the Lord Birt’s contract as the Prime Minister’s strategy adviser, who are the members of the steering groups for the Birt reviews of transport, education and health referred to in the letter.

Asked by
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2005
Reference
1023; 674 c44WA
House
House of Lords