Skip to main content

1-20 of 32 results for subject:"Bishops (affiliation)"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will reintroduce Lords Spiritual from the Church of Ireland to the House of Lords.

Asked by
Andrew Rosindell (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 July 2025
Reference
64002
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
Date
26 March 2024
Reference
HC 199 2023-24
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
Notes
Lord Fowler did not attend as a witness
Date
9 January 2024
Reference
HC 199 2023-24
House
House of Commons

This House of Lords Library briefing looks at the role of the Lords Spiritual in the House of Lords. The membership of the House of Lords includes 26 Church of England Archbishops and Bishops who sit on an ex officio basis as ‘Lords Spiritual’. Their right to sit and vote...

Type
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords
Date
4 September 2017
Reference
LLN-2017-0056

My Lords, I wondered whether to speak in this debate, but since the Bill makes specific reference to the Lords Spiritual, it seemed important to give a view from these Benches. I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Jones, for recognising the continuing place for Bishops, even if an...

Member
Bishop of Norwich (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1437-1440
House
House of Lords

Lords second reading. Agreed to on question. Bill committed to a Committee of the Whole House.

Lead member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb
Answering member
Lord Young of Cookham
Type
Debates on bills
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1428-1460
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is always a sense of déjà vu in these debates and, today, I think the prize for originality goes to my noble friend Lord Campbell-Savours for the proposals that he put forward. Some of the speeches that we have heard made a case for radical reform more...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1452-5
House
House of Lords

I have nearly finished. Perhaps the noble Lord would not mind if I conclude.

Some people have said that my Bill cannot succeed because it is like asking turkeys to vote for Christmas. If I may use the analogy without disrespect to my fellow Peers, the point is that reform, like...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 c1431
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am aware that, when I introduced this Bill at its First Reading, it did not receive a rapturous reception on all sides of the House. Therefore, I state very clearly that it is not aimed at destroying or abolishing this House—on the contrary, it aims to preserve...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1428-1431
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Baroness sits down—

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 c1431
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Cormack had planned to speak in today’s debate, but regrets that he is not able to be here as he is indisposed. As this is a Second Reading debate, I intend to focus on the principle of the Bill. Before I do, I want...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1431-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is always a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Norton, although I do so with some trepidation in view of his great authority in this area, as in many others. I declare my interest as a member of the House of Lords Appointments Commission, but make...

Member
Lord Low of Dalston (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1433-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Low, even though I disagree with both his view on the role of democracy in the House of Lords and the picture he paints of what might be the necessary consequences of having more than one elected body...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1436-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, here we go again on reform. We have already had Bills to reform the Lords from my noble friend Lord Elton and the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, and now we come to another Bill. The sadness of this Bill is that there are no Explanatory Notes. It was...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1440-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I make my general comments on the Bill, I will respond to two interventions, one by the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Norwich and the other by the noble Lord, Lord Norton of Louth. The right reverend Prelate referred to the question of non-voting Peers. He...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1441-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am pleased to follow the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, who, in his own way, has tried to bring clarity to a very complex situation in House of Lords reform. I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Jones, for bringing this Bill forward. It is very important, and I...

Member
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1442-6
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is quite right that if citizens are offered a dichotomous choice, that is what they come up with. That is fairly consistent. When they are given a range of options, not least between input and output legitimacy, you tend to get very different views. It all depends....

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 c1446
House
House of Lords

Indeed, the noble Lord is correct. When you give the public a loaded question, as in some of the examples that he gave, the response is the same. All I am pointing out is that using data that are 10 years out of date does not help the debate.

That comes...

Member
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1446-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, an awful lot of water has flowed under Westminster Bridge since the Bill had its first reading on 26 May last year. What nine months ago may have seemed an interesting, imaginative and perhaps even sensible set of proposals now seems, I suggest—if the noble Baroness, Lady Jones,...

Member
Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1448-9
House
House of Lords

I appreciate what the noble Lord says, but does he accept that in a technologically fast-moving world we need not just the expertise of elders? Younger people understand this world far better, and their expertise is needed.

Member
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2017
Reference
778 c1449
House
House of Lords