Skip to main content

1-20 of 198 results for subject:"Breach of contract"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I. Consultation on a registration scheme for short-term lets in England. 32p. II. Developing a tourist accommodation registration scheme in England: analysis of the call for evidence. 102p.

Deposited by
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Consultation papers; Deposited papers
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
DEP2023-0335
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what information his Department holds on the number of times the NHS Constitution has been breached in the last (a) week, (b) month and (c) year.

Asked by
Baroness Berger (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 November 2017
Reference
112989
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what steps his Department is taking to support private landlords in evicting tenants who are in breach of contract.

Asked by
Lord Austin of Dudley (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 October 2015
Reference
11194
House
House of Commons

Clauses 24 to 37 agreed to, some with amendments. Schedule 5 agreed to, with amendments. Clauses 38 to 41 agreed to.

Lead member
Philip Dunne
Answering member
Lord Beamish; Alison Seabeck
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Defence Reform Bill Committee
Date
17 October 2013
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many successful cases were brought against landlords by tenants for (a) breach of Deposit Protection Service regulations and (b) not paying deposits into the deposit protection scheme in the latest period for which figures are available.

Asked by
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 March 2011
Reference
43143; 524 c572W
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 08/12/2009 from Bridget Prentice MP to Ann Winterton MP regarding the fifth delegated legislation committee debate on the Legal Services Act 2007 (ConsequentialAmendments) Order 2009. 2 p.

Deposited by
Ministry of Justice
Type
Deposited papers
Date
1 December 2009
Reference
DEP2009-3051
House
House of Commons

I was going to say that the Minister made a passing reference to a very important point raised by the noble Lord, Lord Wedderburn, on the first day of Committee last week, which he cast like a fly over the water but no fish bit. It was a very important...

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c177GC
House
House of Lords

In our previous debate, we considered the general proposal to set out certain categories of relevant duty of care, and I explained that the intention was primarily to provide a way of establishing whether a particular set of circumstances was within the scope of the offence without detailed recourse to...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c182-5GC
House
House of Lords

I think that we are getting there; the Minister will probably tell me that he is going to give us a fuller answer when we debate a later amendment. We are still trying to tease out why, if public authorities engage in all the activities that are mentioned in Clause...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c180GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister has answered the point with such clarity that I can only ask that a similar clarity be conveyed in the Bill so that all may understand it equally.

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c180GC
House
House of Lords

I think that the noble Lord’s request to withdraw the amendment should be accepted by the Committee.

Member
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c177GC
House
House of Lords

With regret, yes, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c178GC
House
House of Lords

First, I should clarify that—treating it as an example without any particular facts or employer and simply for the purpose of this debate—one would not be looking under Clause 2(1)(b) as a duty owed as an occupier of premises, but rather under Clause 2(1)(c) or perhaps Clause 2(1)(c)(iv) relating to...

Member
Lord Davidson of Glen Clova (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c224-5GC
House
House of Lords

I am a little reluctant to intrude into what is obviously a rather personal debate. I am sure that we will return to this matter on Report, so I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 37 to 42 not moved.] Clause 3 agreed to....

Member
Lord Lee of Trafford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c226GC
House
House of Lords

This debate is framed by the wider question of the position of public bodies under the Bill, and I wish to consider that wider context. There are, of course, important questions about the extent to which the offence does in fact extend to public authorities and the width of the...

Member
Lord Davidson of Glen Clova (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c220-4GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord. What he says arises in part from the point that the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd, raised in relation to occupier’s liability. I confess that I have not looked into this in detail, but I would certainly expect the Prison Service as...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c220GC
House
House of Lords

I support Amendment No. 37. I have listened carefully to the arguments on Amendment No. 36 but, like my noble friend, I have a little anxiety about making public policy decisions, particularly on resources, justiciable by the courts. On the other hand, as will be clear from my earlier speeches,...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c218-9GC
House
House of Lords

Does it also not follow from what has been said so interestingly by noble and learned Lords about Scottish law that Clause 17 cannot stand in its present state? If the clause applies only to English law, as I understand was the submission, because it refers to manslaughter by gross...

Member
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c216-7GC
House
House of Lords

I regret that I do not have that figure to hand. Certainly more have been taken than have resulted in a conviction. I fully recognise the point—

Member
Lord Davidson of Glen Clova (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c213GC
House
House of Lords

All that I have said—

Member
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
688 c209GC
House
House of Lords