1-20 of 1,107 results for subject:"Budget June 2010"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.274 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Budget June 2010"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Budget June 2010" OR subject_ses:298410
Type
-
Early day motions (1)
+
Members' contributions (1,079)
-
Business questions (2)
-
Maiden speeches (20)
-
Oral answers to questions (5)
-
Oral question time interventions (6)
+
Oral questions (6)
-
Topical questions (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,062)
+
Parliamentary committees (7)
+
Committee proceedings (5)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
-
Select Committee reports (1)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
+
Parliamentary papers (8)
-
House of Commons papers (7)
-
Impact assessments (1)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (11)
+
Debates (10)
-
Budget debates (4)
+
Committee proceedings (5)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
+
Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
+
Statements (2)
+
Oral statements (2)
-
Ministerial statements (2)
+
Parliamentary questions (19)
-
Business questions (2)
+
Oral questions (6)
-
Topical questions (2)
-
Written questions (11)
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
The incentives for job creation in the June 2010 and subsequent Budgets are to be welcomed, but given that for every 10 new jobs eight go to foreign-born workers, what more can be done to encourage the employment of the indigenous work force?
The incentives for job creation in the June 2010 and subsequent Budgets are to be welcomed, but given that for every 10 new jobs eight go to foreign-born workers, what more can be done to encourage the employment of the indigenous work force?
Asked by
Philip Hollobone
(Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
21 June 2011
As my hon. Friend knows, one of the key aspects of the Budget this year was to launch ““The Plan for Growth””. A key part of that was to provide for more apprenticeships and more work experience so that we can make sure that people in this country have the right skills that companies in this country need.
Subjects
Budget June 2010
Date
21 June 2011
Reference
530 c157
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the progressive effects of the measures in the June 2010 Budget which have been implemented to date.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the progressive effects of the measures in the June 2010 Budget which have been implemented to date.
Asked by
Jonathan Reynolds
(Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answered by
Justine Greening
(Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
15 June 2011
For answer on
21 June 2011
Answered on
21 June 2011
The Government published detailed analysis of the impact of measures announced at the June Budget 2010. Charts A1 and A2 in Annex A of Budget 2010 show the impact of measures announced at that fiscal event, in 2012-13.The majority of these measures have now been implemented. These charts show that the most well-off households make the largest contribution to fiscal consolidation in both cash terms and as a proportion of their net income.
Subjects
Budget June 2010
Date
21 June 2011
Reference
60788; 530 c145-6W
House
House of Commons
The right hon. Gentleman's hearing must be suffering, because he obviously did not hear my earlier answer to the hon. Member for Denton and Reddish (Andrew Gwynne).
The right hon. Gentleman's hearing must be suffering, because he obviously did not hear my earlier answer to the hon. Member for Denton and Reddish (Andrew Gwynne).
Answered by
Justine Greening
(Conservative)
Asked by
Denis MacShane
(Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Has the Chancellor by chance seen the interesting analysis by the House of Commons Library showing that the measures in his Budget will affect women three times as adversely as they will affect men? Is he a misogynist?
Subjects
Women; Budget June 2010
Date
21 June 2011
Reference
530 c159
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
As my hon. Friend knows, one of the key aspects of the Budget this year was to launch ““The Plan for Growth””. A key part of that was to provide for more apprenticeships and more work experience so that we can make sure that people in this country have the right skills that companies in this country need.
As my hon. Friend knows, one of the key aspects of the Budget this year was to launch ““The Plan for Growth””. A key part of that was to provide for more apprenticeships and more work experience so that we can make sure that people in this country have the right skills that companies in this country need.
Answered by
Justine Greening
(Conservative)
Asked by
Philip Hollobone
(Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
The incentives for job creation in the June 2010 and subsequent Budgets are to be welcomed, but given that for every 10 new jobs eight go to foreign-born workers, what more can be done to encourage the employment of the indigenous work force?
Subjects
Budget June 2010
Date
21 June 2011
Reference
530 c157
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
As the House knows, the Government published huge amounts of analysis of the impact of the measures announced in the Budget of June 2010. The majority of the measures have now been implemented. The charts in the Budget book show that the most well-off households make the largest contribution to the fiscal consolidation, both in cash terms and as a proportion of their net income.
As the House knows, the Government published huge amounts of analysis of the impact of the measures announced in the Budget of June 2010. The majority of the measures have now been implemented. The charts in the Budget book show that the most well-off households make the largest contribution to the fiscal consolidation, both in cash terms and as a proportion of their net income.
Answered by
Justine Greening
(Conservative)
Asked by
Andrew Gwynne
(Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
What assessment he has made of the progressive effects of the measures in the June 2010 Budget which have been implemented to date.
Subjects
Budget June 2010
Date
21 June 2011
Reference
530 c156
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Has the Chancellor by chance seen the interesting analysis by the House of Commons Library showing that the measures in his Budget will affect women three times as adversely as they will affect men? Is he a misogynist?
Has the Chancellor by chance seen the interesting analysis by the House of Commons Library showing that the measures in his Budget will affect women three times as adversely as they will affect men? Is he a misogynist?
Asked by
Denis MacShane
(Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Treasury
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
21 June 2011
The right hon. Gentleman's hearing must be suffering, because he obviously did not hear my earlier answer to the hon. Member for Denton and Reddish (Andrew Gwynne).
Subjects
Women; Budget June 2010
Date
21 June 2011
Reference
530 c159
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
I do not accept the premise of the hon. Gentleman's question at all. As ever, what we have heard from the Opposition is a cheap political point-scoring jibe. They might be better advised to come up with an alternative plan for tackling the fiscal deficit. The hon. Gentleman had nothing to say to my response to him, which implied that it is the most well-off households in the country that are bearing the brunt of the fiscal consolidation.
I do not accept the premise of the hon. Gentleman's question at all. As ever, what we have heard from the Opposition is a cheap political point-scoring jibe. They might be better advised to come up with an alternative plan for tackling the fiscal deficit. The hon. Gentleman had nothing to say to my response to him, which implied that it is the most well-off households in the country that are bearing the brunt of the fiscal consolidation.
Answered by
Justine Greening
(Conservative)
Asked by
Andrew Gwynne
(Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
I am grateful to the Minister for that reply, but has she seen the analysis produced by the House of Commons Library and my right hon. Friend the Member for Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford (Yvette Cooper) showing that the measures in the last Budget hit women three times as hard as they hit men? Why is that?
Subjects
Budget June 2010
Date
21 June 2011
Reference
530 c156-7
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
The IFS analysis was very clear-cut that it was indeed the most well-off people in our country who were bearing the brunt of the fiscal consolidation measures. I draw the House's attention to the need to look at the overall impact of not just the Budget 2010, but the spending review and the Budget this year. They show that the most well-off people in our country are bearing the brunt of the fiscal consolidation, whether that is measured in terms of their income or of their expenditure.
The IFS analysis was very clear-cut that it was indeed the most well-off people in our country who were bearing the brunt of the fiscal consolidation measures. I draw the House's attention to the need to look at the overall impact of not just the Budget 2010, but the spending review and the Budget this year. They show that the most well-off people in our country are bearing the brunt of the fiscal consolidation, whether that is measured in terms of their income or of their expenditure.
Answered by
Justine Greening
(Conservative)
Asked by
Jonathan Reynolds
(Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
A year ago, when the Institute for Fiscal Studies analysis found that the Budget was a regressive one, the Treasury objected to that analysis on the basis that the IFS had not properly considered the incentives to economic growth that the Budget contained, but given that growth is now flatlining and seems to be frequently downgraded, is the Treasury willing to accept that the IFS analysis last year was entirely correct?
Subjects
Budget June 2010
Date
21 June 2011
Reference
530 c157
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
What assessment he has made of the progressive effects of the measures in the June 2010 Budget which have been implemented to date.
What assessment he has made of the progressive effects of the measures in the June 2010 Budget which have been implemented to date.
Asked by
Andrew Gwynne
(Labour)
Answered by
Justine Greening
(Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Tabled on
15 June 2011
For answer on
21 June 2011
Answered on
21 June 2011
As the House knows, the Government published huge amounts of analysis of the impact of the measures announced in the Budget of June 2010. The majority of the measures have now been implemented. The charts in the Budget book show that the most well-off households make the largest contribution to the fiscal consolidation, both in cash terms and as a proportion of their net income.
Subjects
Budget June 2010
Date
21 June 2011
Reference
60785; 530 c156
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Asked by
Denis MacShane
(Independent (affiliation))
Answered by
Justine Greening
(Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Topical questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Answered on
21 June 2011
Notes
Lead question not printed
Subjects
Women; Budget June 2010
Date
21 June 2011
Reference
60798; 530 c159
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
I am grateful to the Minister for that reply, but has she seen the analysis produced by the House of Commons Library and my right hon. Friend the Member for Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford (Yvette Cooper) showing that the measures in the last Budget hit women three times as hard as they hit men? Why is that?
I am grateful to the Minister for that reply, but has she seen the analysis produced by the House of Commons Library and my right hon. Friend the Member for Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford (Yvette Cooper) showing that the measures in the last Budget hit women three times as hard as they hit men? Why is that?
Asked by
Andrew Gwynne
(Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
21 June 2011
I do not accept the premise of the hon. Gentleman's question at all. As ever, what we have heard from the Opposition is a cheap political point-scoring jibe. They might be better advised to come up with an alternative plan for tackling the fiscal deficit. The hon. Gentleman had nothing to say to my response to him, which implied that it is the most well-off households in the country that are bearing the brunt of the fiscal consolidation.
Subjects
Budget June 2010
Date
21 June 2011
Reference
530 c156-7
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
A year ago, when the Institute for Fiscal Studies analysis found that the Budget was a regressive one, the Treasury objected to that analysis on the basis that the IFS had not properly considered the incentives to economic growth that the Budget contained, but given that growth is now flatlining and seems to be frequently downgraded, is the Treasury willing to accept that the IFS analysis last year was entirely correct?
A year ago, when the Institute for Fiscal Studies analysis found that the Budget was a regressive one, the Treasury objected to that analysis on the basis that the IFS had not properly considered the incentives to economic growth that the Budget contained, but given that growth is now flatlining and seems to be frequently downgraded, is the Treasury willing to accept that the IFS analysis last year was entirely correct?
Asked by
Jonathan Reynolds
(Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
21 June 2011
The IFS analysis was very clear-cut that it was indeed the most well-off people in our country who were bearing the brunt of the fiscal consolidation measures. I draw the House's attention to the need to look at the overall impact of not just the Budget 2010, but the spending review and the Budget this year. They show that the most well-off people in our country are bearing the brunt of the fiscal consolidation, whether that is measured in terms of their income or of their expenditure.
Subjects
Budget June 2010
Date
21 June 2011
Reference
530 c157
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee reports (Government responses);
Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Subjects
Treasury; Budget June 2010
Commons Library location
Stats 410.32; CS 192
Date
11 November 2010
Reference
HC 586 2010-11
House
House of Commons
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assumptions about family structure the Government made in preparing the June 2010 Budget.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assumptions about family structure the Government made in preparing the June 2010 Budget.
Asked by
Fiona Mactaggart
(Labour)
Answered by
David Gauke
(Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
8 September 2010
For answer on
13 September 2010
Answered on
14 September 2010
In producing the analysis in Annex A of the June 2010 Budget document the family structures used were those reported in the Expenditure and Food survey, grossed to national level estimates using factors supplied by the Office for National Statistics.
Subjects
Families; Budget June 2010
Date
14 September 2010
Reference
15235; 515 c970W
House
House of Commons
Lords debate on motion to call attention to the impact of the Budget on people in poverty. Motion withdrawn.
Lords debate on motion to call attention to the impact of the Budget on people in poverty. Motion withdrawn.
Lead member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Answering member
Lord Freud
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates
Subjects
Children; Disability living allowance; Child benefit; Housing benefit; Poverty; Pensions; Public expenditure; Public finance; Social security benefits; Welfare tax credits; Taxation; VAT; Uprating; Consumer prices index; Cuts; Budget June 2010
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
720 c1094-136
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I join the noble Lord, Lord Knight, and others in congratulating those noble Lords who have made maiden speeches today. I enjoyed all of them. The noble Lord, Lord Boateng, pointed out the importance of young people at risk and in care, with all the passion that we...
My Lords, I join the noble Lord, Lord Knight, and others in congratulating those noble Lords who have made maiden speeches today. I enjoyed all of them. The noble Lord, Lord Boateng, pointed out the importance of young people at risk and in care, with all the passion that we...
Member
Lord Freud
(Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Subjects
Children; Disability living allowance; Child benefit; Housing benefit; Poverty; Pensions; Public expenditure; Public finance; Social security benefits; Welfare tax credits; Taxation; VAT; Uprating; Consumer prices index; Cuts; Budget June 2010
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
720 c1130-4
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, it just remains for me to thank all noble Lords for contributing to today’s debate. It has been wide-ranging and informative, as one would expect from your Lordships’ House. I add my congratulations for four marvellous maiden speeches, from my noble friends Lord Boateng, Lady Donaghy and Lord...
My Lords, it just remains for me to thank all noble Lords for contributing to today’s debate. It has been wide-ranging and informative, as one would expect from your Lordships’ House. I add my congratulations for four marvellous maiden speeches, from my noble friends Lord Boateng, Lady Donaghy and Lord...
Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Subjects
Children; Disability living allowance; Child benefit; Housing benefit; Poverty; Pensions; Public expenditure; Public finance; Social security benefits; Welfare tax credits; Taxation; VAT; Uprating; Consumer prices index; Cuts; Budget June 2010
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
720 c1134-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, it is a deep privilege for me to be a Member of this House, and particularly to be making my maiden speech today. Since my introduction, I have found nothing but a welcoming atmosphere and encouragement from all sides of the House, and I would like to put...
My Lords, it is a deep privilege for me to be a Member of this House, and particularly to be making my maiden speech today. Since my introduction, I have found nothing but a welcoming atmosphere and encouragement from all sides of the House, and I would like to put...
Member
Lord McFall of Alcluith
(Labour)
Type
Maiden speeches
Subjects
Children; Disability living allowance; Child benefit; Housing benefit; Poverty; Pensions; Public expenditure; Public finance; Social security benefits; Welfare tax credits; Taxation; VAT; Uprating; Consumer prices index; Cuts; Budget June 2010
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
720 c1118-20
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, since I was introduced on 1 July, I have been overwhelmed by the warmth of my welcome and the generosity of noble Lords on all sides of the House in sharing their experiences with me. I am grateful, too, for the dedication and friendliness of the staff, who...
My Lords, since I was introduced on 1 July, I have been overwhelmed by the warmth of my welcome and the generosity of noble Lords on all sides of the House in sharing their experiences with me. I am grateful, too, for the dedication and friendliness of the staff, who...
Member
Baroness Donaghy
(Labour)
Type
Maiden speeches
Subjects
Children; Disability living allowance; Child benefit; Housing benefit; Poverty; Pensions; Public expenditure; Public finance; Social security benefits; Welfare tax credits; Taxation; VAT; Uprating; Consumer prices index; Cuts; Budget June 2010
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
720 c1103-5
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, in thanking the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie of Luton, for initiating this debate, I confess a degree of trepidation in speaking to your Lordships’ House for the first time. That trepidation is in no way engendered by the kindness and warmth shown to me and my fellow newcomers...
My Lords, in thanking the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie of Luton, for initiating this debate, I confess a degree of trepidation in speaking to your Lordships’ House for the first time. That trepidation is in no way engendered by the kindness and warmth shown to me and my fellow newcomers...
Member
Lord Boateng
(Labour)
Type
Maiden speeches
Subjects
Children; Disability living allowance; Child benefit; Housing benefit; Poverty; Pensions; Public expenditure; Public finance; Social security benefits; Welfare tax credits; Taxation; VAT; Uprating; Consumer prices index; Cuts; Budget June 2010
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
720 c1098-100
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords