Skip to main content

1-20 of 36 results for subject:"Budget November 1995"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What was the percentage growth in business investment in 1995 over its level in 1994; if he will comment on the differences between the growth in business investment in 1995 and his forecast in the November 1995 Red Book; and what is his revised forecast of business investment for 1996...

Asked by
Baroness Beckett (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 April 1996
Reference
25550; 276 c58W;276 c60W
House
House of Commons

What is his estimate for the PSBR for the rest of 1996; and how this compares with projections in the 1995 Budget Red Book. - Inc figs.

Asked by
Denis MacShane (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 April 1996
Reference
25358; 275 c500W
House
House of Commons

If he will ask his Department to conduct a separate analysis of the impact the measures in this year's Budget will have on women in advance of his Autumn Budget Statement; what assessment his Department made in advance of the Autumn Budget Statement of the impact which the measures in...

Asked by
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 April 1996
Reference
275 c257W; 22726;22727
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Notes
Received 21.03.96
Date
18 March 1996
Reference
HC 308 1995/96
House
House of Commons

What arrangements exist within his Department to assess the impact of his Budget on women. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
Jane Kennedy (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 March 1996
Reference
17640; 273 c339W
House
House of Commons

If he will update to include information from 1993-94 to 1997-98 the figures for the burden of direct and indirect taxation in the format used in his Answer of 19th December 1994, Official Report, column 944W, taking account of changes made in the November 1995 Budget, listing separately the effects...

Asked by
Andrew Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 1996
Reference
15106; 272 c360-72W;272 c339-52W
House
House of Commons

Lords debate on motion that this House approves, for the purposes of Section 5 of the European Communities (Amendment) Act 1993, HMG's assessment as set out in the financial statement and budget report 1996/97. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Mackay of Ardbrecknish
Answering member
Lord Eatwell
Department
Treasury
Type
Oral statements
Date
22 February 1996
Reference
569 c1204-18
House
House of Lords

Scottish Grand Committee debate on motion for the Adjournment on effects of the Budget in Scotland. (Committee meeting in Aberdeen). Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Clarke of Nottingham
Department
Scotland Office
Type
Grand Committee proceedings (HC)
Committee
Scottish Grand Committee; Scottish Office
Date
19 February 1996
Reference
SGC c2-40
House
House of Commons

Debate on motion to take note with approval of Governments assessment as set out in the Financial Statement and Budget Report 1996/97 for the purposes of S.5 of the European Communities (Amendment) Act 1993. Agreed to on division. (75 to 11).

Lead member
David Heathcoat-Amory
Answering member
Lord Shore of Stepney
Department
Paymaster General
Type
Oral statements
Date
12 February 1996
Reference
271 c754-78
House
House of Commons

How many representations he has received on his latest Budget. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
Lord Janner of Braunstone (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 February 1996
Reference
12656; 271 c362W
House
House of Commons

How many (a) single persons, (b) married couples and (c) married couples with two children, he estimates will benefit by £9 a week net following his Budget; and what considerations underlay his estimate that taxpayers would benefit by this sum. - Includes figures.

Asked by
Austin Mitchell (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 January 1996
Reference
9779; 270 c228W
House
House of Commons

What representations he has received on the Budget. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
Alice Mahon (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 January 1996
Reference
7093; 269 c301W
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Notes
Received 15.01.96
Date
10 January 1996
Reference
HC 79 1995/96
House
House of Commons

What is his estimate of the taxation effects on pension funds of the corporation tax changes outlined in the Finance Bill. - Pension funds are not liable to corporation tax on their income or gains and are therefore not directly affected by the corporation tax changes proposed in the Budget.

Asked by
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 December 1995
Reference
6018; 268 c1047W;268 c1045W
House
House of Commons

What estimate he has made of the impact on the United Kingdom contribution to the budgets of (a) the United Nations, (b) the World Bank and (c) the European Union of the Budget statement of 28th November. - Shall write shortly.

Asked by
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 1995
Reference
6333; 268 c839W;268 c837W
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
13 December 1995
Reference
HC 79-v 1995/96
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
11 December 1995
Reference
HC 79-iv 1995/96
House
House of Commons

That this House regrets the failure of the Labour Party on 5th December to follow the logic of either of their own arguments concerning the Budget by opposing the reduction in the standard rate of income tax; notes that both support for adequate funding of public services or for concentratingany...

Primary sponsor
Lord Wigley (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Early day motions
Date
7 December 1995
Reference
187
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
7 December 1995
Reference
HC 79-iii 1995/96
House
House of Commons

Implications of the budget for Wales. Debate by the Welsh Grand Committee. Question put that the Chairman do now report to the House that the Committee has considered the matter of the implications of the Budget for Wales. Negatived on Division (25-8). Resolved that the Committee do now adjourn.

Department
Wales Office
Type
Grand Committee proceedings (HC)
Committee
Welsh Grand Committee
Date
6 December 1995
Reference
WGC
House
House of Commons