Skip to main content

1-20 of 217 results for subject:"Caledonian MacBrayne"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Scottish Affairs Committee
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
HC 167 2026-27
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, when he (a) last met and (b) plans to meet Caledonian MacBrayne Limited.

Asked by
Andrew Bowie (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 January 2025
Reference
26320
House
House of Commons

I am more than happy to sit down with the hon. Member to discuss furthering his case, but the overriding fact, which he mentioned, is that the decision sits with the Scottish Government. In the UK we have the National Shipbuilding Office, which provides a wraparound service not only to secure contracts but to ensure that ships are built in UK shipyards.

Answered by
Nusrat Ghani (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 January 2024
Reference
744 c433
House
House of Commons

Ferguson Marine, the last remaining shipyard on the lower Clyde, is threatened by the way in which its current work is configured. It badly requires an order from CalMac for seven small island ferries. The issue of procurement is one for the Scottish Government and their agencies, but will the Minister ensure that no impediment, no obstacle and no rules that are under her control will prevent the order from being given directly by the Scottish Government to Ferguson Marine if they so wish?

Asked by
Kenny MacAskill (Alba Party)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2024
Reference
744 c433
House
House of Commons

This debate goes to the heart of two Scottish institutions. The first is Caledonian MacBrayne—CalMac—which provides lifeline services to the Scottish highlands and islands and whose ships are acquired for it by Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd, or CMAL; both are Scottish Government agencies. The second is Ferguson Marine Engineering Ltd,...

Member
Kenny MacAskill (Alba Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2021
Reference
702 cc887-890
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend, as the biographer of the late Jimmy Reid, share my concern that this whole sorry affair, and the Scottish Government’s involvement in it, renders their protestations about Type 26 frigates risible and is deeply damaging to the proud history of shipbuilding on the Clyde?

Member
Neale Hanvey (Alba Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2021
Reference
702 c889
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend. The history of Scottish shipbuilding is a fantastic record, but it also has a future. To have a future, it has to be not simply on the upper Clyde but on the lower Clyde, and that takes me to what needs to be done.

There...

Member
Kenny MacAskill (Alba Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2021
Reference
702 cc889-891
House
House of Commons

May I begin by congratulating the hon. Member for East Lothian (Kenny MacAskill) on securing this debate? I will turn to the important points and questions that he has raised shortly, although I do have to say at the outset that they are for the Scottish Government, and not for...

Member
Iain Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2021
Reference
702 cc891-2
House
House of Commons

It is good to see a debate taking place in this House on a company based in my constituency of Inverclyde. In fact, the three companies —CMAL, Caledonian MacBrayne and Ferguson—are all based in Inverclyde. It would have been nice to have been notified that this debate was going to...

Member
Ronnie Cowan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2021
Reference
702 c892
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his intervention, although I am afraid it is not for me to intervene on a family feud, if I can put it that way, with the hon. Member for East Lothian. I am well aware that there are traditional courtesies, which should be maintained.

I...

Member
Iain Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2021
Reference
702 c892
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister accept that procurement, liquidation and administration are aspects of company law that are reserved to Westminster? On that basis, is he prepared to meet me to discuss the concerns that I and many others—not simply in Inverclyde, but in Scotland—have about the process that has taken place?...

Member
Kenny MacAskill (Alba Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2021
Reference
702 c892
House
House of Commons

Indeed, the framing of company law is a reserved matter. I would need to take advice from officials, if the hon. Gentleman will allow me, as to whether a breach of that law was a reserved matter or, as I suspect, more a devolved one.

Member
Iain Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2021
Reference
702 c893
House
House of Commons

We have been discussing reserved issues and devolved issues tonight. That is something that pupils at Logie Primary School will be looking at this week through UK Parliament Week. Will the Minister congratulate the young people at Logie Primary School, and the staff, on their interest in UK Parliament Week?...

Member
Douglas Ross (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2021
Reference
702 c893
House
House of Commons

I am happy to say that my hon. Friend has given them a masterclass in how to do that. Referring back to the subject of this debate, I very much hope that

among the pupils at Logie Primary School we will see future mariners, shipbuilders, engineers and technicians. I wish...

Member
Iain Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2021
Reference
702 cc893-4
House
House of Commons

Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Kenny MacAskill
Answering member
Iain Stewart
Department
Scotland Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
2 November 2021
Reference
702 cc886-894
House
House of Commons

That this House highlights the fundraising efforts of Caledonian MacBrayne staff based in Argyll and Bute constituency; notes that CalMac are raising money for the Scottish Association for Mental Health, with 40 employees taking part in Megan’s Miles fundraising challenge; acknowledges that each employee is undertaking 126 miles of exercise...

Primary sponsor
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Type
Early day motions
Date
1 March 2021
Reference
1556
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether Caledonian MacBrayne registered their sea-going employees in a company registered in Guernsey; and, if so, how much revenue was foregone by HMRC in employer's national insurance contributions.

Asked by
Lord Robertson of Port Ellen (Labour)
Answering body
HM Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 January 2018
Reference
HL4609
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what discussions he has held with the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Scottish Executive on off-shoring tax arrangements for crew of Caledonian MacBrayne.

Asked by
Angus Brendan MacNeil (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 July 2005
Reference
436 c242W; 8172
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what discussions he has had with the (a) Scottish Executive and (b) the management of Caledonian MacBrayne on offshore crewing; what assessment he has made of the effect of offshore crewing on (i) national insurance revenues paid by Caledonian MacBrayne and (ii) rights...

Asked by
Angus Brendan MacNeil (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 July 2005
Reference
436 c90W;436 c90-1W; 8525
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the effect is on (a) UK nationals and (b) non-UK nationals access to benefits conditional on payment of national insurance contributions of their employer's decision to register offshore.

Asked by
Angus Brendan MacNeil (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 July 2005
Reference
436 c89-90W; 8555
House
House of Commons