1-20 of 36 results for subject:"Car Servicing and Repair Task Force"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.309 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Car Servicing and Repair Task Force"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Car Servicing and Repair Task Force" OR subject_ses:18884
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when she expects her Department's reviews of the circumstances surrounding the death of Raoul Moat to be completed.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when she expects her Department's reviews of the circumstances surrounding the death of Raoul Moat to be completed.
Asked by
Guy Opperman
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Herbert of South Downs
(Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
22 October 2010
For answer on
26 October 2010
Answered on
8 November 2010
The Home Office is not conducting a review of the circumstances surrounding the death of Raoul Moat. The circumstances surrounding the death are the subject of an independent investigation by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). The handling of the investigation is a matter for the IPCC.
Subjects
Homicide; Northumberland; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
8 November 2010
Reference
518 c132-3W; 19834
House
House of Commons
Will the Prime Minister consider having another conference call with Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder of Facebook, whose site is currently hosting the group ““RIP Raoul Moat””, where a whole host of anti-police statements are posted? Can the Prime Minister have a conversation with Mark Zuckerberg about removing this group?
Will the Prime Minister consider having another conference call with Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder of Facebook, whose site is currently hosting the group ““RIP Raoul Moat””, where a whole host of anti-police statements are posted? Can the Prime Minister have a conversation with Mark Zuckerberg about removing this group?
Asked by
Chris Heaton-Harris
(Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
14 July 2010
My hon. Friend makes a very good point. As far as I can see, it is absolutely clear that Raoul Moat was a callous murderer—full stop, end of story—and I cannot understand any wave, however small, of public sympathy for this man. There should be sympathy for his victims, and for the havoc he wreaked in that community; there should be no sympathy for him.
Subjects
Homicide; Northumberland; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force; Emergency services; Pensions
Date
14 July 2010
Reference
513 c944-5
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps were taken by Northumbria Police when the recent warning from HM Prison Durham was received; and whether a multi-agency risk assessment conference was called to assess the risk faced by Samantha Stobbart.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps were taken by Northumbria Police when the recent warning from HM Prison Durham was received; and whether a multi-agency risk assessment conference was called to assess the risk faced by Samantha Stobbart.
Asked by
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Neville-Jones
(Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Procedure
Topical questions (HL)
For answer on
7 July 2010
Answered on
7 July 2010
My Lords, Northumbria Police received information on Friday 2 July from Durham prison that Mr Moat had threatened to cause Ms Stobbart serious harm. The chief constable referred the handling of the information to the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which will conduct an independent investigation to determine whether Northumbria Police responded adequately. I also understand that Northumbria Police did not conduct a multi-agency risk assessment conference to assess the risk faced by Ms Stobbart.
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c200-1
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I thank the Minister for that Answer, but can I ask her why they did not? Bearing in mind that these events demonstrate clearly the need for a risk assessment in such circumstances, what steps will be put in place to make sure that multi-agency risk assessments are made? Can she give us an assurance that the Government will maintain the commitment made by the previous Government to hold the 80 remaining multi-agency risk assessment conferences, which are necessary to cover the whole of the country? They are the best way of saving lives and money.
My Lords, I thank the Minister for that Answer, but can I ask her why they did not? Bearing in mind that these events demonstrate clearly the need for a risk assessment in such circumstances, what steps will be put in place to make sure that multi-agency risk assessments are made? Can she give us an assurance that the Government will maintain the commitment made by the previous Government to hold the 80 remaining multi-agency risk assessment conferences, which are necessary to cover the whole of the country? They are the best way of saving lives and money.
Asked by
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
(Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
7 July 2010
My Lords, we certainly agree that the multi-agency risk assessment process is valuable. I have not heard anything from my colleagues that would suggest that we have any intention of doing away with them. There are clearly a number of actions that the police could have taken. One of the reasons why the chief constable referred the actions of her force to the IPCC was to discover what appropriate action could have been taken.
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force; HMP Durham
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c201
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Northumbria Police are receiving mutual aid. My right honourable friend the Home Secretary has been in touch with the force. If it needs any further assistance, it will certainly be given it. As for the noble Lord’s basic question of whether it is a good idea for forces to help each other, we as a party are in favour of forces joining together, or indeed merging if they wish, provided there is local support for such a move.
My Lords, the Northumbria Police are receiving mutual aid. My right honourable friend the Home Secretary has been in touch with the force. If it needs any further assistance, it will certainly be given it. As for the noble Lord’s basic question of whether it is a good idea for forces to help each other, we as a party are in favour of forces joining together, or indeed merging if they wish, provided there is local support for such a move.
Answered by
Baroness Neville-Jones
(Conservative)
Asked by
Lord Mackenzie of Framwellgate
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, does the noble Baroness think that there is now a powerful case for looking at the size and number of police forces?
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c202
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the noble Baroness think that there is now a powerful case for looking at the size and number of police forces?
My Lords, does the noble Baroness think that there is now a powerful case for looking at the size and number of police forces?
Asked by
Lord Mackenzie of Framwellgate
(Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
7 July 2010
My Lords, the Northumbria Police are receiving mutual aid. My right honourable friend the Home Secretary has been in touch with the force. If it needs any further assistance, it will certainly be given it. As for the noble Lord’s basic question of whether it is a good idea for forces to help each other, we as a party are in favour of forces joining together, or indeed merging if they wish, provided there is local support for such a move.
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c202
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
I am sure the whole House, including me, share the sentiments that have just been expressed.
I am sure the whole House, including me, share the sentiments that have just been expressed.
Answered by
Baroness Neville-Jones
(Conservative)
Asked by
Lord Stevens of Kirkwhelpington
(Crossbench)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, I declare an interest as a former chief constable of Northumbria. Would the Minister not agree that this is a time for supporting Northumbria Police in a most dangerous and difficult situation? This is not a time for apportioning blame in any way, shape or form. Would she also not agree that this will be fully investigated by an independent authority? Let us support the police in their difficult task.
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c201
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I declare an interest as a former chief constable of Northumbria. Would the Minister not agree that this is a time for supporting Northumbria Police in a most dangerous and difficult situation? This is not a time for apportioning blame in any way, shape or form. Would she also not agree that this will be fully investigated by an independent authority? Let us support the police in their difficult task.
My Lords, I declare an interest as a former chief constable of Northumbria. Would the Minister not agree that this is a time for supporting Northumbria Police in a most dangerous and difficult situation? This is not a time for apportioning blame in any way, shape or form. Would she also not agree that this will be fully investigated by an independent authority? Let us support the police in their difficult task.
Asked by
Lord Stevens of Kirkwhelpington
(Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
7 July 2010
I am sure the whole House, including me, share the sentiments that have just been expressed.
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c201
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, Northumbria Police received information on Friday 2 July from Durham prison that Mr Moat had threatened to cause Ms Stobbart serious harm. The chief constable referred the handling of the information to the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which will conduct an independent investigation to determine whether Northumbria Police responded adequately. I also understand that Northumbria Police did not conduct a multi-agency risk assessment conference to assess the risk faced by Ms Stobbart.
My Lords, Northumbria Police received information on Friday 2 July from Durham prison that Mr Moat had threatened to cause Ms Stobbart serious harm. The chief constable referred the handling of the information to the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which will conduct an independent investigation to determine whether Northumbria Police responded adequately. I also understand that Northumbria Police did not conduct a multi-agency risk assessment conference to assess the risk faced by Ms Stobbart.
Answered by
Baroness Neville-Jones
(Conservative)
Asked by
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps were taken by Northumbria Police when the recent warning from HM Prison Durham was received; and whether a multi-agency risk assessment conference was called to assess the risk faced by Samantha Stobbart.
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c200-1
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, while I am mindful of the points made by the noble Lord, Lord Stevens of Kirkwhelpington, given that there has been newspaper criticism of the efficiency of the Prison Service in issuing a warning and whatever response there may have been by Northumbria Police, what safety guarantees can the noble Baroness give on behalf of the coalition Government that in a few years’ time, with 25 per cent fewer prison officers and a 25 per cent reduction in police grant, which will no doubt impact disproportionately on specialist resources, this sort of event will not recur, or is the answer that Raoul Moat would not have been in prison at all because his sentence was only 18 weeks and, as far as the coalition is concerned, people like him should roam the country freely?
My Lords, while I am mindful of the points made by the noble Lord, Lord Stevens of Kirkwhelpington, given that there has been newspaper criticism of the efficiency of the Prison Service in issuing a warning and whatever response there may have been by Northumbria Police, what safety guarantees can the noble Baroness give on behalf of the coalition Government that in a few years’ time, with 25 per cent fewer prison officers and a 25 per cent reduction in police grant, which will no doubt impact disproportionately on specialist resources, this sort of event will not recur, or is the answer that Raoul Moat would not have been in prison at all because his sentence was only 18 weeks and, as far as the coalition is concerned, people like him should roam the country freely?
Asked by
Lord Harris of Haringey
(Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
7 July 2010
This individual was in for a short custodial sentence. Under the regime that prevails at the moment, half that sentence was served. As things stand, under legislation that was not passed by this Government, the governor has no discretion to do anything other than release the individual. He performed a duty in warning the police.
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c202
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, will the Minister address the very specific Question put by my noble and learned friend Lady Scotland—why was a multi-agency risk assessment not held?
My Lords, will the Minister address the very specific Question put by my noble and learned friend Lady Scotland—why was a multi-agency risk assessment not held?
Asked by
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean
(Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
7 July 2010
Let me give the House the timelines. The prisoner was released on 1 July, the information about this man’s statements was given to the force on 2 July and the chief constable learnt of that information only on 4 July. She referred the matter to the IPCC the following morning; clearly she felt there was a need to do so. I cannot go beyond that at the moment because this matter is under investigation, so I cannot help the House further.
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c201-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister understand the concern in this House about the release of potentially dangerous prisoners? Will she use this opportunity to revise, review, and preferably improve the method of screening prisoners before they are released in order to protect the public?
My Lords, does the Minister understand the concern in this House about the release of potentially dangerous prisoners? Will she use this opportunity to revise, review, and preferably improve the method of screening prisoners before they are released in order to protect the public?
Asked by
Lord Elton
(Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
7 July 2010
My Lords, my noble friend raises a very important issue. I understand that the IPCC will follow the investigation trail, so I think that we will get help in the form of its view about what happened immediately before the release. However, the issue that is raised is important and no doubt we will have to follow it.
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c202
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
This individual was in for a short custodial sentence. Under the regime that prevails at the moment, half that sentence was served. As things stand, under legislation that was not passed by this Government, the governor has no discretion to do anything other than release the individual. He performed a duty in warning the police.
This individual was in for a short custodial sentence. Under the regime that prevails at the moment, half that sentence was served. As things stand, under legislation that was not passed by this Government, the governor has no discretion to do anything other than release the individual. He performed a duty in warning the police.
Answered by
Baroness Neville-Jones
(Conservative)
Asked by
Lord Harris of Haringey
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, while I am mindful of the points made by the noble Lord, Lord Stevens of Kirkwhelpington, given that there has been newspaper criticism of the efficiency of the Prison Service in issuing a warning and whatever response there may have been by Northumbria Police, what safety guarantees can the noble Baroness give on behalf of the coalition Government that in a few years’ time, with 25 per cent fewer prison officers and a 25 per cent reduction in police grant, which will no doubt impact disproportionately on specialist resources, this sort of event will not recur, or is the answer that Raoul Moat would not have been in prison at all because his sentence was only 18 weeks and, as far as the coalition is concerned, people like him should roam the country freely?
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c202
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Let me give the House the timelines. The prisoner was released on 1 July, the information about this man’s statements was given to the force on 2 July and the chief constable learnt of that information only on 4 July. She referred the matter to the IPCC the following morning; clearly she felt there was a need to do so. I cannot go beyond that at the moment because this matter is under investigation, so I cannot help the House further.
Let me give the House the timelines. The prisoner was released on 1 July, the information about this man’s statements was given to the force on 2 July and the chief constable learnt of that information only on 4 July. She referred the matter to the IPCC the following morning; clearly she felt there was a need to do so. I cannot go beyond that at the moment because this matter is under investigation, so I cannot help the House further.
Answered by
Baroness Neville-Jones
(Conservative)
Asked by
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, will the Minister address the very specific Question put by my noble and learned friend Lady Scotland—why was a multi-agency risk assessment not held?
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c201-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Was the threat that was made of such a nature that it could have been interpreted as a threat to kill? Does the noble Baroness appreciate that, under the Criminal Law Act 1977, the threat to kill is a very serious offence that is punishable by 10 years’ imprisonment? Was any thought given to arresting this man before he left prison and with a view to prosecution, thus avoiding the possibility of further offences?
Was the threat that was made of such a nature that it could have been interpreted as a threat to kill? Does the noble Baroness appreciate that, under the Criminal Law Act 1977, the threat to kill is a very serious offence that is punishable by 10 years’ imprisonment? Was any thought given to arresting this man before he left prison and with a view to prosecution, thus avoiding the possibility of further offences?
Asked by
Lord Elystan-Morgan
(Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
7 July 2010
My Lords, it is absolutely right to say that such a threat would be very serious. My understanding is that the police force was not informed that there was such a threat to life.
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c201
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we certainly agree that the multi-agency risk assessment process is valuable. I have not heard anything from my colleagues that would suggest that we have any intention of doing away with them. There are clearly a number of actions that the police could have taken. One of the reasons why the chief constable referred the actions of her force to the IPCC was to discover what appropriate action could have been taken.
My Lords, we certainly agree that the multi-agency risk assessment process is valuable. I have not heard anything from my colleagues that would suggest that we have any intention of doing away with them. There are clearly a number of actions that the police could have taken. One of the reasons why the chief constable referred the actions of her force to the IPCC was to discover what appropriate action could have been taken.
Answered by
Baroness Neville-Jones
(Conservative)
Asked by
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, I thank the Minister for that Answer, but can I ask her why they did not? Bearing in mind that these events demonstrate clearly the need for a risk assessment in such circumstances, what steps will be put in place to make sure that multi-agency risk assessments are made? Can she give us an assurance that the Government will maintain the commitment made by the previous Government to hold the 80 remaining multi-agency risk assessment conferences, which are necessary to cover the whole of the country? They are the best way of saving lives and money.
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c201
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, it is absolutely right to say that such a threat would be very serious. My understanding is that the police force was not informed that there was such a threat to life.
My Lords, it is absolutely right to say that such a threat would be very serious. My understanding is that the police force was not informed that there was such a threat to life.
Answered by
Baroness Neville-Jones
(Conservative)
Asked by
Lord Elystan-Morgan
(Crossbench)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Was the threat that was made of such a nature that it could have been interpreted as a threat to kill? Does the noble Baroness appreciate that, under the Criminal Law Act 1977, the threat to kill is a very serious offence that is punishable by 10 years’ imprisonment? Was any thought given to arresting this man before he left prison and with a view to prosecution, thus avoiding the possibility of further offences?
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c201
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, my noble friend raises a very important issue. I understand that the IPCC will follow the investigation trail, so I think that we will get help in the form of its view about what happened immediately before the release. However, the issue that is raised is important and no doubt we will have to follow it.
My Lords, my noble friend raises a very important issue. I understand that the IPCC will follow the investigation trail, so I think that we will get help in the form of its view about what happened immediately before the release. However, the issue that is raised is important and no doubt we will have to follow it.
Answered by
Baroness Neville-Jones
(Conservative)
Asked by
Lord Elton
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, does the Minister understand the concern in this House about the release of potentially dangerous prisoners? Will she use this opportunity to revise, review, and preferably improve the method of screening prisoners before they are released in order to protect the public?
Subjects
Crimes of violence; Prisoners' release; Risk assessment; Northumbria Police; HMP Durham; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c202
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
asked Her Majesty's Government:Why, when Lord Triesman said on 30 March 2006 that ““we are taking a close and active interest in the case of Mr Ali Manzarpour, and we are looking after the rights of Mr Manzarpour as well as we can”” (Official Report, col. 852), Baroness Scotland of...
asked Her Majesty's Government:Why, when Lord Triesman said on 30 March 2006 that ““we are taking a close and active interest in the case of Mr Ali Manzarpour, and we are looking after the rights of Mr Manzarpour as well as we can”” (Official Report, col. 852), Baroness Scotland of...
Asked by
Earl Attlee
(Conservative; Social Democratic Party)
Answered by
Lord Triesman
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Answered on
4 June 2007
The noble Earl refers to my response of 30 March 2006 (Official Report, col. 852), which related to the consular assistance that was provided to Mr Ali Manzarpour while he was detained in Poland. This was in line with standard consular policy towards British nationals in detention abroad. On 14 December 2006, Mr Manzarpour was released from Warsaw detention centre and returned to the United Kingdom. The Answer given by my noble friend the Minister of State for the Home Department, the right honourable Baroness Scotland QC, on 9 May to the noble Earl (Official Report, cols. WA 260-61), related to a question about an extradition request by the United States to Poland for Mr Manzarpour. The Government clearly have no locus in this matter and are unable to answer such questions.
Subjects
Detainees; Extradition; Poland; USA; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c155WA; 3967
House
House of Lords
asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the situation with regard to Mr Ali Manzarpour's extradition to the United States; and
asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the situation with regard to Mr Ali Manzarpour's extradition to the United States; and
Asked by
Earl Attlee
(Conservative; Social Democratic Party)
Answered by
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Answered on
9 May 2007
These Questions have been assumed to relate to an extradition request bythe United States of America to Poland forMr Manzarpour. The United Kingdom Government have no locus in this case and consequently are unable to answer the Questions.
Subjects
Extradition; Poland; USA; Car Servicing and Repair Task Force
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
3453; 691 c260-1WA
House
House of Lords