Skip to main content

1-20 of 314 results for subject:"Cash, Christopher"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
HC 1700 2024-26; HL 262 2024-26
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Lords statement on espionage cases and the Official Secrets Act.

Lead member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent
Department
Home Office
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
851 cc23-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the report from the Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy describes the handling of the Cash and Berry case as “shambolic” and highlights serious systemic failures and deficiencies. The report raises serious concerns about the ability of the Government to pursue those who want to undermine our...

Member
Baroness Finn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
851 c23
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for her questions. I join her in thanking the Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy for its scrutiny and its work in shining some light—where there has been a great deal of heat—on what actually happened. On the key points that she has raised,...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
851 c23
House
House of Lords

My Lords, rather than simply blaming outdated espionage laws, does the Minister agree with me, as a member of the Joint Committee, that, given the parallels in the new legislation, they will need to be carefully handled to prevent a similar outcome happening again? What assurances

can she give that...

Member
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
851 c23
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for her work as a member of the committee. I make it clear that we keep all legislation and its effectiveness under review, and we will continue to do so under the new National Security Act 2023. I would like to reassure your Lordships’ House...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
851 c25
House
House of Lords

My Lords, labelling something an official secret is all too convenient a way for the Government to keep people in the dark. One example is BCCI, a bank that was forcibly closed in July 1991 but there has never been a full independent investigation. After five and a half years...

Member
Lord Sikka (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
851 c25
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I usually practise for left-field questions but I was not ready for that one. I thank my noble friend for his question and I will reflect on what he says, but let us be clear: the clear responsibility of this Government, as for any Government, is national security,...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
851 c25
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister recognise that the statements of the Deputy National Security Adviser in the recent Chinese espionage case provided ample and sufficient grounds for the prosecution of that case?

Member
Lord Macdonald of River Glaven (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
851 c25
House
House of Lords

I put on record my thanks to the Deputy National Security Adviser. He is an exemplary professional and has

provided evidence in line with government policy of the time and government policy today. We continue to work closely with him and we are very grateful for his work. Noble Lords...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
851 c25
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
1 December 2025
Reference
HC 1414 2024-26; HL 223 2024-26
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, was China officially designated as a threat to national security by the UK Government when (a) the alleged offences of Christopher Berry and Chris Cash for spying for China took place and (b) when the CPS made a decision to prosecute.

Asked by
Derek Twigg (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 2025
Reference
78005
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, when he plans to respond to Question 78005 on Christopher Berry and Christopher Cash, tabled on 10 October 2025 by the hon. Member for Widnes and Halewood.

Asked by
Derek Twigg (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 2025
Reference
84915
House
House of Commons

Lords statement on the role of the Attorney General's Office in the decision to drop the China spy prosecution.

Lead member
Lord Hermer
Department
Attorney General
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1057-1061
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Attorney-General has a duty to superintend the prosecution agencies and to be consulted about sensitive and high-profile cases. The practice for cases that are likely to be dropped, but of which the Attorney-General was initially informed, is that the Attorney-General is advised in advance of the risk...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 c1057
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble and learned Lord for his question. May I just correct a few facts? I was not informed by the DPP on 1 September; I was informed on 3 September. Secondly, and this is an important constitutional point, in our constitutional framework politicians play no role whatever...

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 c1057
House
House of Lords

My Lords, some 50 years ago last month, I was junior in a trial that took place at Mold Crown Court, prosecuted by the then Attorney-General, Sam Silkin—they earned their spurs in those days by prosecuting in court. An ex-RAF pilot from Valley had knocked on the front door of...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 c1059
House
House of Lords

Consent was given by a law officer under the previous Government to this prosecution. I hope the noble Lord will forgive me if I do not go into the evidential details in this case. The decision was made by the independent CPS. In this case, the Director of Public Prosecutions...

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 c1059
House
House of Lords

The noble and learned Lord will know that the Court of Appeal recently stated that an “enemy” includes a country which poses a threat to the national security of this country. Is it the Government’s view that the People’s Republic of China does pose a threat to the national security...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 c1059
House
House of Lords

I will deal first with the Roussev case and the difficulties the Crime Prosecution Service faced in bringing this prosecution. The noble Lord is quite right that in Roussev, which was a rare case for the courts to look at—the meaning of “enemy” under

the 1911 Act—it was said that...

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1059-1060
House
House of Lords