1-20 of 1,246 results for subject:"Cash limits"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.29 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Cash limits"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Cash limits" OR subject_ses:90461
Type
+
Legislation (2)
+
Delegated legislation (2)
-
Statutory instruments (2)
+
Members' contributions (36)
-
Oral answers to questions (18)
+
Oral questions (18)
-
Topical questions (1)
+
Parliamentary committees (7)
+
Committee proceedings (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee reports (5)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
+
Parliamentary papers (40)
-
Command papers (21)
-
Deposited papers (13)
-
House of Commons papers (5)
-
Unprinted papers (1)
-
White papers (1)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (3)
+
Debates (3)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
+
Committee proceedings (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
+
Legislative debates (2)
-
Debates on bills (1)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
+
Parliamentary questions (1,183)
+
Oral questions (18)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Written questions (1,165)
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
For the coming year, the Secretary of State has enabled councils to increase tax by 3%, compared with just 2% last year, but the cash limit has been retained at £5 when parity would be £7.50. That affects 88 small district councils. Will the Secretary of State consider a change?
For the coming year, the Secretary of State has enabled councils to increase tax by 3%, compared with just 2% last year, but the cash limit has been retained at £5 when parity would be £7.50. That affects 88 small district councils. Will the Secretary of State consider a change?
Asked by
Mark Pawsey
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
22 January 2018
A number of people have made that representation. I have listened carefully and we will keep the issue under review. As my hon. Friend knows, the draft settlement is just that at the moment, and we are looking at it carefully.
Subjects
Council tax; District councils; Cash limits
Date
22 January 2018
Reference
635 c23
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
A number of people have made that representation. I have listened carefully and we will keep the issue under review. As my hon. Friend knows, the draft settlement is just that at the moment, and we are looking at it carefully.
A number of people have made that representation. I have listened carefully and we will keep the issue under review. As my hon. Friend knows, the draft settlement is just that at the moment, and we are looking at it carefully.
Answered by
Sajid Javid
(Conservative)
Asked by
Mark Pawsey
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Oral answers to questions
For the coming year, the Secretary of State has enabled councils to increase tax by 3%, compared with just 2% last year, but the cash limit has been retained at £5 when parity would be £7.50. That affects 88 small district councils. Will the Secretary of State consider a change?
Subjects
Council tax; District councils; Cash limits
Date
22 January 2018
Reference
635 c23
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Mr David Gauke
Department
Treasury
Type
Statutory instruments
Procedure
Negative
Laid on
5 June 2014
Made on
4 June 2014
Coming into force
1 July 2014
Legislation
Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992; Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005; Individual Savings Account (Amendment No. 2) Regulations 2014
Subjects
Individual savings accounts; Stocks and shares; Cash limits
Commons Library location
UP 76 2014-15
Date
5 June 2014
Reference
SI 2014/1450
House
House of Commons
Laid on
13 July 2011
Subjects
Central government; External financing limits; Government departments; Public expenditure; Supply estimates; Cash limits; Departmental expenditure limits
Commons Library location
Stats 410.32
Date
13 July 2011
Reference
Cm 8133
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid on
26 July 2010
Subjects
Central government; External financing limits; Government departments; Public expenditure; Supply estimates; Cash limits; Departmental expenditure limits
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
Cm 7911
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers;
Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Notes
See also NAO reports HC 452 2009-10, HC 216 2009-10
Subjects
Databases; Audit; Cost effectiveness; Business; Central government; Government departments; Guaranteed minimum pensions; Payments; Procurement; Pension Protection Fund; Standards; Regulation; Reorganisation; Cash limits
Commons Library location
CS 246
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
HC 520 2009-10
House
House of Commons
Laid on
16 July 2009
Subjects
Central government; External financing limits; Government departments; Public expenditure; Supply estimates; Cash limits; Departmental expenditure limits
Commons Library location
Stats 410.32
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
Cm 7606
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid on
15 July 2008
Subjects
Central government; External financing limits; Government departments; Public expenditure; Supply estimates; Cash limits; Departmental expenditure limits
Commons Library location
CS 192
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
Cm 7419
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid on
19 July 2007
Subjects
Central government; External financing limits; Government departments; Public expenditure; Supply estimates; Cash limits; Departmental expenditure limits
Date
19 July 2007
Reference
Cm 7156
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 7 November 2005, Official Report, column 273W, on residential care, on what legal basis local authorities can set cash limits on the amount they will pay for residential placements to meet assessed needs.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 7 November 2005, Official Report, column 273W, on residential care, on what legal basis local authorities can set cash limits on the amount they will pay for residential placements to meet assessed needs.
Asked by
Paul Burstow
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Liam Byrne
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
30 November 2005
For answer on
2 December 2005
Answered on
19 December 2005
The Department allocates funding to local authorities (LAs) to enable them to carry out their social service functions. It is for LAs to decide how they spend this money, taking account of the need to balance their overall budgets and meet their statutory obligations.Under section 7 of the Local Authority Social Services Act 1970, the Secretary of State may issue guidance to local authorities on how they carry out their social services functions and LAs are required to act in accordance with such guidance, unless they have good reason for departing from it but without freedom to take a substantially different course. The latest guidance is contained in local authority circular LAC(2004)20, which is available in the Library.Under that guidance, LAs should set the amount they would usually expect to pay for accommodation having regard to assessed care needs-the ‘usual cost'. This cost should be set by LAs at the start of a financial or other planning period, or in response to significant changes in the cost of providing care, to be sufficient to meet the assessed care needs of supported residents in residential accommodation. LAs should set more than one usual cost where the cost of providing residential accommodation to specific groups is different. When placing people in residential care, councils are not required to pay more than they would usually pay, having regard to the usual cost.
Subjects
Care homes; Finance; Law; Local government; Cash limits
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
34712; 440 c2645-6W
House
House of Commons
Laid on
20 July 2005
Subjects
Public expenditure; Supply estimates; Cash limits
Date
20 July 2005
Reference
Cm 6639
House
House of Commons
Laid on
20 July 2005
Subjects
Central government; External financing limits; Government departments; Public expenditure; Supply estimates; Cash limits; Departmental expenditure limits
Commons Library location
Stats 410.32
Date
20 July 2005
Reference
Cm 6883
House
House of Commons
Laid on
20 July 2004
Notes
Received 21.07.04
Subjects
External financing limits; Public expenditure; Cash limits
Commons Library location
Stats 410.32
Date
20 July 2004
Reference
Cm 6293
House
House of Commons
Laid on
16 July 2003
Notes
Received 08.07.03
Subjects
External financing limits; Public expenditure; Cash limits
Commons Library location
CS 192
Date
16 July 2003
Reference
Cm 5884
House
House of Commons
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will list the principal components of the changes in the budget of (a) HM Customs and Excise and (b) the Inland Revenue between 2002-03 and 2003-04; what internal administrative unit each change is attributed to; and if he will make a...
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will list the principal components of the changes in the budget of (a) HM Customs and Excise and (b) the Inland Revenue between 2002-03 and 2003-04; what internal administrative unit each change is attributed to; and if he will make a...
Asked by
Lord Taylor of Goss Moor
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Baroness Primarolo
(Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
4 February 2003
For answer on
10 February 2003
Answered on
10 February 2003
Matthew Taylor: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the principal components of the changes in the budget of (a)
HM Customs and Excise and (b) the Inland Revenue between 2002-03 and 2003-04; what internal administrative unit each change is
attributed to; and if he will make a statement. [96523]
Dawn Primarolo: Aggregate budget figures for 2002-03 to 2005-06 were published in the 2002 Spending Review White paper (Cm 5570) on
page 126. More up to date and detailed information will appear in the Departmental Spring Reports 2003 due to be published by the
revenue departments by the end of April.
Subjects
Customs and Excise; Inland Revenue; Public expenditure; Cash limits; Departmental expenditure limits
Date
10 February 2003
Reference
96523; 399 c605W;399 c603W
House
House of Commons
Laid on
15 July 2002
Notes
Received 16.07.02
Subjects
External financing limits; Public expenditure; Cash limits
Date
15 July 2002
Reference
Cm 5574
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills, pursuant to her Answer of 14th February 2002 at 380 c607-8W, what changes have since been made to the departmental expenditure limit. - Includes table.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills, pursuant to her Answer of 14th February 2002 at 380 c607-8W, what changes have since been made to the departmental expenditure limit. - Includes table.
Asked by
Mike O'Brien
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Morris of Yardley
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
20 March 2002
For answer on
21 March 2002
Answered on
21 March 2002
Mr. Mike O'Brien: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills, pursuant to her answer of 14 February 2002, Official
Report, columns 607-08W, what changes have since been made to the departmental expenditure limit. [45865]
Estelle Morris: The Departmental Expenditure Limit (DEL) for the Department for Education and Skills (DfES), including the Office
for Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools (OFSTED), which has a separate Estimate, has been decreased by £210,000 from
£20,304,478,000 to £20,304,268,000.
The impact of this reduction on the resources element of the DEL is set out in the following table:
£000
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Resources Capital
Change New DEL Of which: Non-voted DEL Of which: Non-voted
Voted Voted
RfR 1 -210 17,014,918 6,675,052 10,339,866 2,820,374 1,851,123 969,251
RfR 3 0 125,833 125,833 0 80,470 80,470 0
RfR 4 0 98,073 98,073 0 0 0 0
Total change -210 -- -- -- -- -- --
Ofsted 0 152,019 152,019 0 12,581 12,581 0
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
The DfES Spring Supplementary Estimate included a transfer of provision from the Department for Transport, Local Government and the
Regions (DTLR) for Neighbourhood Surveys. It was subsequently discovered that this transfer was not included by DTLR in their Spring
Supplementary or in their parliamentary answer announcing changes to their DEL.
The administration costs limits remain unchanged as follows:
Original
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
£000
DfES (RfR1) 219,730
Sure Start (RfR3) 3,890
Children and Young People's Unit (RfR4) 2,491
Ofsted 27,095
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Subjects
Government departments; Public expenditure; Department for Education and Skills; Cash limits; Operating costs; Departmental expenditure limits
Date
21 March 2002
Reference
45865; 382 c504W;382 c502W
House
House of Commons
Statement on what plans there are to change the departmental expenditure limit and administration cost limits for her Department and the Office of Fair Trading. - Inc table.
Statement on what plans there are to change the departmental expenditure limit and administration cost limits for her Department and the Office of Fair Trading. - Inc table.
Asked by
Phil Sawford
(Labour)
Answered by
Patricia Hewitt
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
27 February 2002
For answer on
28 February 2002
Answered on
28 February 2002
Subjects
Administration; Department of Trade and Industry; Government departments; Public expenditure; Office of Fair Trading; Cash limits; Operating costs; Departmental expenditure limits
Date
28 February 2002
Reference
40167; 380 c1484-6W
House
House of Commons
Statement on what plans there are to change the departmental expenditure limits and administration costs limits for 2001-02.
Statement on what plans there are to change the departmental expenditure limits and administration costs limits for 2001-02.
Asked by
Joan Humble
(Labour)
Answered by
Denis MacShane
(Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
26 February 2002
For answer on
27 February 2002
Answered on
27 February 2002
Mrs. Humble: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what plans there are to change the departmental
expenditure limits and administration costs limits for 2001-02. [39605]
Mr. MacShane: Subject to parliamentary approval of the necessary Supplementary Estimate, the Foreign and Commonwealth DEL will be
increased by £32,584,000 from £1,362,704,000 to £1,395,288,000 and the administration costs limits will be increased by £34,335,000
from £634,598,000 to £668,933,000. Within the DEL change, the impact on resources and capital is as set out in the following table:
£000
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Resources Capital
Change 32,600 -16
New DEL 1,268,738 126,550
of which:
Voted 1,100,856 103,050
Non-voted 167,882 23,500
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
The change in the resources element of DEL arises from:
(i) an increase of £965,000 in respect of take up of EYF;
(ii) an increase of £9,462,000 in respect of an adjustment for Overseas Price Movements;
(iii) a net increase of £10,000,000 as a result of a Reserve Claim for 11 September related activity;
(iv) a PES transfer to the Ministry of Defence of £1,154,000 in respect of British Defence Staff in Washington;
(v) an increase of £18,944,000 to reflect transfers from capital to improve budgetary flexibility;
(vi) an increase of £2,330,000 relating to a successful bid against the Reserve for funds to tackle organised crime;
(vii) a PES transfer to the Department for International Development of £8,061,000 in respect of funding arrangements on the
Conflict Prevention pool;
(viii) a decrease in the FCO's Resource DEL of £5,743,000 to reflect a corresponding overspend on the FCO's Resource DEL last
financial year;
(ix) a PES transfer from the Ministry of Defence of £125,000 relating to funding for Ascension Island;
(x) a PES transfer to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport of £2,000,000 towards the cost of mounting the 2002 Commonwealth
Games in Manchester;
(xi) an increase in £2,145,000 in the FCO's departmental unallocated pool for Conflict Prevention to reflect an increase in funding
levels;
(xii) a PES transfer from the Department for International Development of £18,837,000 to reflect revisions to funding arrangements
for Conflict Prevention;
(xiii) a PES transfer to the Ministry of Defence of £15,000,000 to reflect revisions to funding arrangements for Conflict
Prevention;
(xiv) a PES transfer from the Department for International Development of £1,750,000 to reflect revisions for funding arrangements
for Conflict Prevention.
The change in the capital element of DEL arises from:
(i) an increase of £1,200,000 to Capital to reflect a successful bid against the Capital Modernisation Fund;
(ii) an increase of £828,000 in respect of an adjustment for Overseas Price Movements;
(iii) an increase of £16,900,000 as a result of a Reserve Claim for September 11 related activity;
(iv) a decrease of £18,944,000 to reflect transfers from capital to resource in order to improve budgetary flexibility.
The increases will be offset by inter-departmental transfers and will not impact on the planned total of public expenditure.
Subjects
Administration; Government departments; Public expenditure; Foreign and Commonwealth Office; Cash limits; Operating costs; Departmental expenditure limits
Date
27 February 2002
Reference
39605; 380 c1313-4W;380 c1315-6W
House
House of Commons
Statement on what plans there are to amend her Department's (a) departmental expenditure limit and (b) administration costs limits for 2001-02. - Inc table.
Statement on what plans there are to amend her Department's (a) departmental expenditure limit and (b) administration costs limits for 2001-02. - Inc table.
Asked by
David Miliband
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Jowell
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
26 February 2002
For answer on
26 February 2002
Answered on
26 February 2002
Mr. Miliband: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what plans there are to amend her Department's (a)
departmental expenditure limit and (b) administration costs limits for 2001-02. [38913]
Tessa Jowell: Subject to parliamentary approval of the necessary supplementary estimate for the Department for Culture, Media and
Sport, the Departmental Expenditure Limit (DEL) for 2001-02 will be increased by £10,211,000 from £1,169,881,000 to £1,180,092,000
and the Department's administration costs limit increased by £3,171,000 from £32,237,000 to £35,408,000.
Within the DEL change, the impact on resources and capital are as set out in the following table:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
£000
Resources
Change 10,121
New DEL 1,037,374
of which:
Voted 148,247
Non-voted 889,127
Capital
Change 90
New DEL 142,718
of which:
Voted 101,817
Non-voted 40,901
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
The change in the resource element of the DEL arises from the transfer of resources from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office of
£2,000,000 toward the costs of mounting the 2002 Commonwealth Games in Manchester; the transfer of resources, as part of the
machinery of government changes, from the Cabinet Office of £210,000 for the administration costs of the Commonwealth Games Unit;
from the Home Office of £2,461,000 for the administration costs of the Golden Jubilee Unit and of the alcohol licensing, gambling,
film and video licensing functions, of £1,265,000 for the receipts and £3,680,000 for the expenditure of the Gaming Board of Great
Britain, and of £3,000,000 for grants and associated expenditure for the Queen's Golden Jubilee.
Other changes include the provision of additional resources under the end-year flexibility (EYF) arrangements, as set out in the
Public Expenditure Outturn White Paper, 2000-01 (Cm. 5243), of £35,000 for the Government Art Collection and to provide for a
transfer of resources of £500,000 from the Department's research to administration costs budgets.
The change in the capital element of the DEL arises from the transfer from the Home Office of £90,000 for the capital expenditure of
the Golden Jubilee Unit. The increases will be offset by transfers or charged to the DEL reserve and will not therefore add to the
planned total of public expenditure.
Subjects
Administration; Government departments; Public expenditure; Department for Culture, Media and Sport; Cash limits; Operating costs; Departmental expenditure limits
Date
26 February 2002
Reference
38913; 380 c1109W;380 c1111W
House
House of Commons