1-20 of 640 results for subject:"Commission for Patient and Public Involvement in Health"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.273 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Commission for Patient and Public Involvement in Health"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Commission for Patient and Public Involvement in Health" OR subject_t:CPPIH OR subject_t:"Patient and Public Involvement in Health Commission" OR subject_ses:25497
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
SI 2008/526. (Negative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum from the Department of Health. Coming into force 30 June 2008. Amends SI 2003/3006 and SI 2005/2966.
SI 2008/526. (Negative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum from the Department of Health. Coming into force 30 June 2008. Amends SI 2003/3006 and SI 2005/2966.
SI 2008/528. (Negative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum and impact assessment from the Department of Health. Coming into force 1 April 2008. Amends SI 2002/3048.
SI 2008/528. (Negative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum and impact assessment from the Department of Health. Coming into force 1 April 2008. Amends SI 2002/3048.
Letter dated 30/10/2007 from Baroness Andrews to Earl Howe regarding various issues following the third reading of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill.
Letter dated 30/10/2007 from Baroness Andrews to Earl Howe regarding various issues following the third reading of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill.
Letter dated 19/10/2007 from Baroness Andrews to Earl Howe and Baroness Neuberger regarding various issues following the debate at report stage on the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill.
Letter dated 19/10/2007 from Baroness Andrews to Earl Howe and Baroness Neuberger regarding various issues following the debate at report stage on the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill.
I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
I am pleased that the Minister has returned with proposals via the other place that reflect the concerns expressed earlier in Committee. It seemed extraordinary that there were to be two completely different processes, not just separate, but different when in operation. It is very much to the credit of...
I am pleased that the Minister has returned with proposals via the other place that reflect the concerns expressed earlier in Committee. It seemed extraordinary that there were to be two completely different processes, not just separate, but different when in operation. It is very much to the credit of...
I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
I draw attention to amendment (a) to amendment No. 48 that was tabled by me and my hon. Friends. I again recognise the work that has been done by the Government and those in the other place to seek the concessions that the Minister has mentioned for extending the time...
I draw attention to amendment (a) to amendment No. 48 that was tabled by me and my hon. Friends. I again recognise the work that has been done by the Government and those in the other place to seek the concessions that the Minister has mentioned for extending the time...
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. If the argument is for a 12-month period between the order and the election, clearly the process of preparing the order, consulting on it and the consideration in the House beforehand mean precisely that one would have to make the changes a year before...
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. If the argument is for a 12-month period between the order and the election, clearly the process of preparing the order, consulting on it and the consideration in the House beforehand mean precisely that one would have to make the changes a year before...
I am sure that the hon. Gentleman will support that opinion with all his vigour.
I am sure that the hon. Gentleman will support that opinion with all his vigour.
I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for that, but I do not follow his argument. All that our amendment asks is that a notice period be given; I do not think that that has any bearing on the running of an election. I do not think that the public...
I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for that, but I do not follow his argument. All that our amendment asks is that a notice period be given; I do not think that that has any bearing on the running of an election. I do not think that the public...
Of course, as we learned recently, a week is a long time in politics; six months is almost an eternity. I think that the six-month date that the Lords decided on is correct, for all the reasons that the hon. Gentleman gives, but to reiterate an earlier point, the May...
Of course, as we learned recently, a week is a long time in politics; six months is almost an eternity. I think that the six-month date that the Lords decided on is correct, for all the reasons that the hon. Gentleman gives, but to reiterate an earlier point, the May...
I also want to speak to amendment No. 48. I do not like elections to be run on the same day. People vote for a particular reason; at a local level, they may vote because they want efficient council services and they perceive that their local authority is doing a...
I also want to speak to amendment No. 48. I do not like elections to be run on the same day. People vote for a particular reason; at a local level, they may vote because they want efficient council services and they perceive that their local authority is doing a...
First, let me say that the string of Lords amendments that we are considering represent good progress. They improve the legislation. I want to speak to Lords amendment No. 48, as the hon. Member for North-East Bedfordshire (Alistair Burt) just did. The amendment is a great improvement on what was...
First, let me say that the string of Lords amendments that we are considering represent good progress. They improve the legislation. I want to speak to Lords amendment No. 48, as the hon. Member for North-East Bedfordshire (Alistair Burt) just did. The amendment is a great improvement on what was...
I declare an interest as a member of Tameside metropolitan council until next May. Metropolitan districts such as Tameside and Stockport—they cover my constituency—elect by thirds so, in reality, they have annual elections except for the fallow year. Would the Conservative amendment not mean that local authorities would be looking...
I declare an interest as a member of Tameside metropolitan council until next May. Metropolitan districts such as Tameside and Stockport—they cover my constituency—elect by thirds so, in reality, they have annual elections except for the fallow year. Would the Conservative amendment not mean that local authorities would be looking...
We now move on to part 2 of the Bill, which deals with elections. In response to good debate, strong scrutiny and a well argued case in the other place, the Government made a number of amendments. As Members are aware, part 2 contains provisions on resolution periods, in which...
We now move on to part 2 of the Bill, which deals with elections. In response to good debate, strong scrutiny and a well argued case in the other place, the Government made a number of amendments. As Members are aware, part 2 contains provisions on resolution periods, in which...
This group of amendments to part 3 would remove the provisions allowing councils to operate a directly elected executive model of governance arrangements. We were disappointed when the provisions were removed from the Bill in the other place. Directly elected executives were an important element of the measures that we...
This group of amendments to part 3 would remove the provisions allowing councils to operate a directly elected executive model of governance arrangements. We were disappointed when the provisions were removed from the Bill in the other place. Directly elected executives were an important element of the measures that we...