1-20 of 308 results for subject:"Community safety partnerships"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.295 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Community safety partnerships"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Community safety partnerships" OR subject_t:"Community safety local partnerships" OR subject_ses:345710
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of using any of the savings from abolishing Police and Crime Commissioners to help fund Community Safety Partnerships.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of using any of the savings from abolishing Police and Crime Commissioners to help fund Community Safety Partnerships.
Abolishing Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) is expected to save the taxpayer around £100m in this Parliament. Savings from cancelling future PCC elections will be retained by the Exchequer with the remainder reinvested back into policing.
Funding for Community Safety Partnerships (CSP) is provided locally by partners. We are working closely with other government departments to consider how existing partnership arrangements, including CSPs, should operate within the new police governance system.
What police and crime commissioners do and the government's plans to scrap them.
What police and crime commissioners do and the government's plans to scrap them.
Information on knife crime in England and Wales: possession offences, rules for retailers and efforts to prevent serious violence.
Information on knife crime in England and Wales: possession offences, rules for retailers and efforts to prevent serious violence.
Clause 72 agreed to. Clause 73, discussed with new clause 48 (Duty to investigate suspects diligently), new clause 6 (Automatic dismissal on conviction for a serious criminal offence), new clause 7 (Automatic suspension of officers charged with specified allegations), new clause 8 (Automatic dismissal of officers who fail vetting), new clause 9 (Duty of officer to hand over personal mobile phone), new clause 33 (Police perpetrated domestic abuse as a recordable complaint), new clause 34 (Domestic abuse complainants: police officers and police staff), new clause 35 (Vetting: duty of chief officers), new clause 36 (Allegation of violence against women and girls: withdrawal of warrant card) and new clause 43 (Domestic abuse: automatic referral to Independent Office for Police Conduct), under consideration.
Clause 72 agreed to. Clause 73, discussed with new clause 48 (Duty to investigate suspects diligently), new clause 6 (Automatic dismissal on conviction for a serious criminal offence), new clause 7 (Automatic suspension of officers charged with specified allegations), new clause 8 (Automatic dismissal of officers who fail vetting), new...
My rt hon Friend the Minister of State for Crime, Policing and Fire (Chris Philp) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:
I am pleased to set out to the House the Government’s response to three consultations that have informed provisions in the Criminal Justice Bill which is being introduced...
My rt hon Friend the Minister of State for Crime, Policing and Fire (Chris Philp) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:
I am pleased to set out to the House the Government’s response to three consultations that have informed provisions in the Criminal Justice Bill which is being introduced...
I. Consultation on two legislative measures to improve the law enforcement response to serious and organised crime: summary of consultation responses and conclusion. Incl. annex. 22p. II. Review of the Computer Misuse Act 1990: analysis of consultation responses. Incl. annex. 19p. III. Community Safety Partnerships Review and Anti-Social Behaviour Powers Consultation: Government response to consultation. 28p.
I. Consultation on two legislative measures to improve the law enforcement response to serious and organised crime: summary of consultation responses and conclusion. Incl. annex. 22p. II. Review of the Computer Misuse Act 1990: analysis of consultation responses. Incl. annex. 19p. III. Community Safety Partnerships Review and Anti-Social Behaviour Powers...
I am pleased to set out to the House the Government’s response to three consultations that have informed provisions in the Criminal Justice Bill which is being introduced in the House of Commons today.
Government response to the public consultation “Strengthening the law enforcement response to serious and organised crime”
...
I am pleased to set out to the House the Government’s response to three consultations that have informed provisions in the Criminal Justice Bill which is being introduced in the House of Commons today.
Government response to the public consultation “Strengthening the law enforcement response to serious and organised crime”
...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether it is her policy that community safety partnerships should make an assessment of the impact of Right Care, Right Person operational model in their communities.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether it is her policy that community safety partnerships should make an assessment of the impact of Right Care, Right Person operational model in their communities.
The Right Care Right Person (RCRP) approach sets out a threshold to assist police decision making on responding to incidents based on a duty of care. The benefits of this are that the police should only be responding to health & social care incidents where there is a clear and immediate risk of serious harm or criminality or where they are needed to exercise their powers under the Mental Health Act. This ensures the public receive the right care from the right person and reduces unnecessary police involvement.
The Right Care Right Person operational model is a locally led approach with decisions on how and when to implement it to be made at a local level, between operationally independent police forces and health care partners. These will be based on different local area needs and requirements. This approach does not change the police response to situations where a crime has occurred or where there is a risk of serious harm to the individual or the wider public.
This is a model that is based on partnership working, with local police chiefs and health and social care partners working together to understand where the police are filling gaps for other agencies and the route to address this. It will be important for partners to continue to work together, to safely implement the approach.
It will be for local chiefs to decide which aspects of RCRP that their force will adopt, working with partners, and they will need to ensure that they properly consider equality impacts and risks as part of that process.
As required by the Equality Act 2010, the Home Office is considering its Public Sector Equality Duties, as part of our work with health and policing partners to create a new national partnership agreement, which will signal national support for the RCRP principles.
The recent HMICFRS State of Policing Report viewed the implementation of RCRP as a positive step in the report and strongly supported this approach which further builds on the findings made in Humberside’s PEEL inspection report last year.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will make an assessment with Cabinet colleagues of the potential impact of the Right Care, Right Person operational model on community safety partnerships overseen by local authorities.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will make an assessment with Cabinet colleagues of the potential impact of the Right Care, Right Person operational model on community safety partnerships overseen by local authorities.
The Right Care Right Person (RCRP) approach sets out a threshold to assist police decision making on responding to incidents based on a duty of care. The benefits of this are that the police should only be responding to health & social care incidents where there is a clear and immediate risk of serious harm or criminality or where they are needed to exercise their powers under the Mental Health Act. This ensures the public receive the right care from the right person and reduces unnecessary police involvement.
The Right Care Right Person operational model is a locally led approach with decisions on how and when to implement it to be made at a local level, between operationally independent police forces and health care partners. These will be based on different local area needs and requirements. This approach does not change the police response to situations where a crime has occurred or where there is a risk of serious harm to the individual or the wider public.
This is a model that is based on partnership working, with local police chiefs and health and social care partners working together to understand where the police are filling gaps for other agencies and the route to address this. It will be important for partners to continue to work together, to safely implement the approach.
It will be for local chiefs to decide which aspects of RCRP that their force will adopt, working with partners, and they will need to ensure that they properly consider equality impacts and risks as part of that process.
As required by the Equality Act 2010, the Home Office is considering its Public Sector Equality Duties, as part of our work with health and policing partners to create a new national partnership agreement, which will signal national support for the RCRP principles.
The recent HMICFRS State of Policing Report viewed the implementation of RCRP as a positive step in the report and strongly supported this approach which further builds on the findings made in Humberside’s PEEL inspection report last year.
My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 91 to which I have added my name, and to Amendment 469 in the names of my noble friend Lady Pinnock and myself. I also want to express general support for the amendments in this very disparate group.
On Amendment 91, some noble Lords...
My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 91 to which I have added my name, and to Amendment 469 in the names of my noble friend Lady Pinnock and myself. I also want to express general support for the amendments in this very disparate group.
On Amendment 91, some noble Lords...
My Lords, I start by congratulating the clerks who made up this group—it is an astonishing achievement to have managed to get so many completely separate issues all in one group. I am afraid that I am going to make life more difficult for the Front-Benchers, particularly for the noble...
My Lords, I start by congratulating the clerks who made up this group—it is an astonishing achievement to have managed to get so many completely separate issues all in one group. I am afraid that I am going to make life more difficult for the Front-Benchers, particularly for the noble...
My Lords, I rise very briefly to support the probing Amendments 89 and 90, in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, about the role of local government and the NHS. I speak as somebody who has been an NHS manager—I think I said previously that the noble Lord,...
My Lords, I rise very briefly to support the probing Amendments 89 and 90, in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, about the role of local government and the NHS. I speak as somebody who has been an NHS manager—I think I said previously that the noble Lord,...
My Lords, very briefly, because time presses, my name is attached to the stand part debates on Clauses 58 and 59. I do not seek to repeat what has been said already about those two clauses, but I hope the Minister will give clear evidence for the need for both...
My Lords, very briefly, because time presses, my name is attached to the stand part debates on Clauses 58 and 59. I do not seek to repeat what has been said already about those two clauses, but I hope the Minister will give clear evidence for the need for both...
My Lords, this is another really important group of amendments to do with the extent of devolution: what are the limits that the Government are putting on that? The only areas we have explored, very important though they are, are the National Health Service, policing, transport services—buses, in particular—and general...
My Lords, this is another really important group of amendments to do with the extent of devolution: what are the limits that the Government are putting on that? The only areas we have explored, very important though they are, are the National Health Service, policing, transport services—buses, in particular—and general...
My Lords, as others have said, this has certainly been a mixed bag of amendments, but clearly they all look at the extent of devolution, the powers and the different functions involved. We have two probing amendments in this group. First, in Clause 19, my Amendment 91 probes
“whether the Government...
My Lords, as others have said, this has certainly been a mixed bag of amendments, but clearly they all look at the extent of devolution, the powers and the different functions involved. We have two probing amendments in this group. First, in Clause 19, my Amendment 91 probes
“whether the Government...
Has the noble Baroness given any consideration to one of the provisions here about the statement that the mayor must make on consent by the constituent councils? I think she said that it would be only if they gave their unanimous consent but, on page 51 of the Bill, subsection...
Has the noble Baroness given any consideration to one of the provisions here about the statement that the mayor must make on consent by the constituent councils? I think she said that it would be only if they gave their unanimous consent but, on page 51 of the Bill, subsection...
Absolutely; the noble Lord is completely correct. I was trying to get across that there should be unanimous consent for anything as serious as that matter; I thank the noble Lord for drawing attention to it.
6.45 pm
Absolutely; the noble Lord is completely correct. I was trying to get across that there should be unanimous consent for anything as serious as that matter; I thank the noble Lord for drawing attention to it.
6.45 pm
My Lords, this group of amendments covers a number of matters relating to combined county authorities, combined authorities and local authorities, including NHS functions,
the conferral of additional functions on combined authority mayors, the fair funding review, trade union liaison and bus services.
I start with Amendments 89 and 90, tabled...
My Lords, this group of amendments covers a number of matters relating to combined county authorities, combined authorities and local authorities, including NHS functions,
the conferral of additional functions on combined authority mayors, the fair funding review, trade union liaison and bus services.
I start with Amendments 89 and 90, tabled...
I am sorry to interrupt the Minister. I thank her for what she has said so far, but I want to ask her why there is no need for consultation of any kind under Clause 59. She praised the consultation that was necessary under Clause 58 and made it part...
I am sorry to interrupt the Minister. I thank her for what she has said so far, but I want to ask her why there is no need for consultation of any kind under Clause 59. She praised the consultation that was necessary under Clause 58 and made it part...
My Lords, that is because, as I said, the role of the PCC does not impinge on the roles of the constituency councils. It is purely a role for the mayor. When you are looking at things to do with health, you are probably including the care roles of many...
My Lords, that is because, as I said, the role of the PCC does not impinge on the roles of the constituency councils. It is purely a role for the mayor. When you are looking at things to do with health, you are probably including the care roles of many...