Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,395 results for subject:"Contact orders"

Type

-
Early day motions (2)
+ Legislation (10) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Bills (2) + Public bills (2)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (7)
-
Statutory instruments (7)
+ Members' contributions (1,096)
-
Business questions (29)
-
Oral answers to questions (29)
+ Oral questions (29)
-
Prime Minister's questions (5)
-
Topical questions (5)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,038)
+ Parliamentary committees (16) + Committee proceedings (14)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (6)
-
Select Committee reports (1)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
+ Parliamentary papers (16)
-
Command papers (3)
-
Consultation papers (2)
-
Deposited papers (11)
-
House of Lords papers (1)
-
Unprinted papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (52) + Debates (32)
-
Adjournment debates (4)
+ Committee proceedings (14)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (6)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (22)
-
Debates on bills (22)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Paper petitions (2)
+ Statements (17) + Oral statements (1)
-
Business statements (1)
-
Written statements (16)
+ Written corrections (1)
-
Ministerial corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (273)
-
Business questions (29)
+ Oral questions (29)
-
Prime Minister's questions (5)
-
Topical questions (5)
-
Written questions (215)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Paper petitions (2)
+ Research briefings (4)
-
Commons Briefing papers (4)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion that this House has considered children in child contact arrangements. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Alison Hume
Answering member
Catherine Atkinson
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates
Date
10 June 2026
Reference
787 cc158-165WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered children in child contact arrangements.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Dr Murrison, and to lead a debate on putting children first in child contact arrangements, an issue that is of great importance to me, to my constituents and to...

Member
Alison Hume (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2026
Reference
787 c158WH
House
House of Commons

I commend the hon. Lady for securing this debate on a very complex issue. There were elements of the Courts and Tribunals Bill that were impossible to support, but it also sought to address the issue of a child’s consent in contact arrangements and, importantly, the need for the child’s...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2026
Reference
787 c158WH
House
House of Commons

I completely agree that the child’s voice must be heard and is too often overlooked.

Some of these so-called experts lack proper qualifications and are not regulated by the Health and Care Professions Council. Changes proposed in 2025 to address the issue of unregulated psychologists have been criticised as too weak...

Member
Alison Hume (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2026
Reference
787 c158WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for bringing this debate to the House and for mentioning the so-called experts. We know that accusations of so-called parental alienation are too often used against mothers who are trying to protect their children, but because so few family law cases are publicly available, we...

Member
Kirith Entwistle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2026
Reference
787 c159WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for her work on the issue. I completely agree that unfortunately we are seeing far, far too many mothers who are disbelieved and have had their children removed from them without any basis for doing so at all. Lives are being destroyed.

If a parent complains,...

Member
Alison Hume (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2026
Reference
787 cc159-162WH
House
House of Commons

I completely endorse the hon. Lady’s calls. I have talked about how we need reform to the family courts. Will she support my calls for the Government to support family contact centres? In my constituency, the Woking Family Contact Centre has been run by volunteers for 25 years, which is...

Member
Will Forster (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2026
Reference
787 c162WH
House
House of Commons

I have raised with Baroness Levitt not only the lack of access to child contact centres but the cost of access. It appears that many of them are unregulated, so I thank the hon. Gentleman for raising that issue.

To conclude, everybody wants to see the family justice system evolve to...

Member
Alison Hume (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2026
Reference
787 c162WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Dr Murrison. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Scarborough and Whitby (Alison Hume) and commend her for securing such an important debate.

I want to start by reflecting on the stories that she shared—stories of children feeling unheard and of...

Member
Catherine Atkinson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2026
Reference
787 cc162-3WH
House
House of Commons

It is true that the Government do not recognise parental alienation and the syndrome, but courts too often do. In fact, a report released just yesterday by the campaign group Right to Equality that analysed language used in family court judgments found that over 70% of those judgments used victim-blaming...

Member
Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2026
Reference
787 c163WH
House
House of Commons

I was discussing that report with Baroness Levitt yesterday, so it is one that I am conscious of and one that we will be looking at.

The Family Justice Council has published guidance to assist courts in handling cases of this nature. Importantly, the guidance recognises that there can be entirely...

Member
Catherine Atkinson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2026
Reference
787 cc163-5WH
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Clerk of the House
Department
Domestic Abuse Commissioner
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
13 October 2025
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps she is taking to prevent people who have committed sexual offences from obtaining parental responsibility or contact orders for children conceived as a result of their crimes; and whether she plans to introduce amendments to the Children Act to close...

Asked by
Alex Barros-Curtis (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 September 2025
Reference
72715
House
House of Commons

Last month, a devastating report by Women’s Aid revealed that a total of 67 children have been killed over a 30-year period by a known domestically abusive parent, in circumstances related to the courts’ use of the principle of the presumption of contact. Two of those children, Jack and Paul Sykes, are the sons of my formidable constituent, Claire Throssell. All these deaths were preventable. Will the Minister update the House on the progress of the Government’s review of the presumption of contact?

Asked by
Marie Tidball (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 July 2025
Reference
770 cc796-7
House
House of Commons

The killings of Jack and Paul were horrendous crimes and I would like to pay tribute to my hon. Friend and to her constituent, Claire, for their tireless campaigning on these issues. I am sure that she would agree that the guiding principle for any reform must be children’s welfare. That is why we have requested a review of the presumption of contact. We will be publishing findings and next steps very shortly.

Answered by
Sarah Sackman (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 July 2025
Reference
770 c796
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member for Penistone and Stocksbridge (Dr Tidball) raised the issue of the presumption of contact. I have a constituency case where one parent has abused their children and the other parent has had to pay for the supervision of those children. The presumption of contact is not working in cases where domestic abuse has happened, so I echo the calls from the hon. Member for Penistone and Stocksbridge for an urgent review of it.

Asked by
Helen Morgan (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 July 2025
Reference
770 cc798-9
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member will know that a staggering 60% of cases that go through our family courts involve some form of domestic abuse or allegation thereof. That is why consideration of the operation of the presumption of contact and wider consideration of domestic abuse allegations in our family courts are so important. It is why officials and Ministers are taking the process really seriously.

Answered by
Sarah Sackman (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 July 2025
Reference
770 c798
House
House of Commons

I pay tribute to my hon. Friend, and to my hon. Friend the Member for Calder Valley (Josh Fenton-Glynn), who have both raised this critical issue. I particularly pay tribute to Claire. Her courage and strength are outstanding. Family courts must never be a tool that domestic abusers can use to continue their appalling abuse. We are expanding a number of Pathfinder courts to protect the welfare of children and are reviewing the presumption of involvement that she raises.

Answered by
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
5 March 2025
Reference
763 c30
House
House of Commons

Forty-eight children that we know of have been killed by known domestically abusive parents during court-permitted contact visits, including Paul and Jack Sykes, who were tragically murdered at the hands of their father in a house fire. Their mother, and my constituent, Claire Throssell has campaigned against the presumption of contact, which allows such abusers to have unsupervised contact with their children. Will the Prime Minister meet Claire and me to discuss the urgent need to remove the presumption of contact in law?

Asked by
Marie Tidball (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 March 2025
Reference
763 c30
House
House of Commons

I know that the Justice Secretary is aware of the tragic case of my constituent Sara Sharif. Will she consider reforming family courts and ending the presumption in favour of parental contact despite the fact that there were safeguarding concerns?

Asked by
Will Forster (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 January 2025
Reference
761 c154
House
House of Commons