Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,879 results for subject:"Cost benefit analysis"

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (8) + Bills (8) + Public bills (8) + Private members' bills (8)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (6)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Members' contributions (862)
-
Business questions (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (69)
+ Oral questions (74)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (4)
-
Proceeding contributions (719)
+ Parliamentary committees (36) + Committee proceedings (14)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (9)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (4)
-
Select Committee reports (15)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (5)
-
Select Committee written evidence (4)
+ Parliamentary papers (226)
-
Annual reports (8)
-
Command papers (4)
-
Consultation papers (25)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (15)
-
Deposited papers (179)
-
House of Commons papers (20)
-
House of Lords papers (4)
-
Impact assessments (55)
-
Unprinted papers (7)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (63) + Debates (32)
-
Adjournment debates (2)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (14)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (9)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (4)
-
Debates on select committee reports (5)
+ Legislative debates (19)
-
Debates on bills (18)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
-
Questions for short debate (2)
+ Statements (24)
-
Written statements (24)
+ Written corrections (4)
-
Ministerial corrections (4)
+ Parliamentary questions (787)
-
Business questions (2)
+ Oral questions (74)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (4)
-
Written questions (711)
+ Research briefings (10) + Commons Briefing papers (4)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)
-
POSTbriefs (1)
-
POSTnotes (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government what value for money assessment they have made of the use of polygraph tests by police forces.

Asked by
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 August 2026
Reference
HL2374
House
House of Lords

I. Emergency Services Mobile Communications Programme (ESMCP): 2025 Programme business case (PBC) summary. 12p. II. Letter dated 30/07/2026 from Lord Hanson of Flint to the Deposited Papers clerk regarding the ESMCP Programme business case summary for deposit in the House libraries. 1p.

Deposited by
Home Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
30 July 2026
Reference
DEP2026-0529
House
House of Lords

From October 2027, it will be possible for some drink containers to be recycled in exchange for money, as part of the UK’s new deposit return schemes (DRSs).

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
CBP-10453

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, with reference to the Green Paper entitled Watch this space, published on 23 June 2026, whether her Department has undertaken a cost-benefit assessment of proposals relating to the prominence of public service media content.

Asked by
Rupert Lowe (Restore Britain)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
17869
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 8 July 2026 to Question 14435 on Aviation: Alternative Fuels, whether the cost-benefit analysis for the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Mandate modelled the potential impact of SAF compliance costs on (a) package holiday prices and (b) demand for...

Asked by
Jerome Mayhew (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
17405
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the answer of 26 June 2026 to Question 11220 on Aviation: Alternative Fuels, what assumptions were made in the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Mandate cost-benefit analysis on the proportion of increased ticket prices that would be passed through by airlines to...

Asked by
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 July 2026
Reference
15002
House
House of Commons
Department
Treasury
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
9 July 2026
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will publish a list of road and rail infrastructure projects sponsored by her Department for which (i) strategic outline, (ii) outline full and (iii) full business cases have been completed, including (a) current status, (b) most recent benefit-cost ratio, (c)...

Asked by
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
13933
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent assessment she has made of the benefit-cost ratio of the Lower Thames Crossing scheme.

Asked by
James McMurdock (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 July 2026
Reference
14200
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what is the projected cost-benefit ratio of completing the East Birmingham tram extension.

Asked by
Liam Byrne (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
12065
House
House of Commons

Lords committee stage fourth day. Clauses 20 to 22 agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Stockwood
Answering member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe; Lord Altrincham
Department
Treasury
Type
Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Notes
Northern Ireland and Scottish legislative consent sought.
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc465-522GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sure everyone has reread the Hansard transcript and is fully on top of the debate that took place on Monday, so I will attempt to keep my remarks brief.

I am tempted to engage with the challenge from the noble Lord, Lord Bridges, on this group of...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc465-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, for me, the group speaks to the essential balance which underpins the purpose and function of effective financial regulation. Of course regulation must promote safety, stability and confidence in the system, but regulation must also support growth, competitiveness and innovation. It must help ensure that the United Kingdom...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc466-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government share the views of many in this debate, particularly on the importance of ensuring that the secondary growth and competitiveness objectives are comprehensively embedded in the work of the regulators. That is why the Bill legislates to extend the requirement for the regulators to produce annual...

Member
Lord Stockwood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc468-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken today and the previous day. These amendments all relate to the secondary competitive and growth objective. I think that we share the same desire to have an effective secondary competitive and growth objective, which my lead amendment, in particular, was...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c469GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Neville-Rolfe

105: Clause 21, page 26, line 3, leave out “changing” and insert “reducing”

Member’s explanatory statement

These amendments ensure that the Treasury has the power to reduce various time limits for regulatory approvals, but not to increase them.

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c470GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise enthusiastically —we have to get going for the football—to move Amendment 105, in my name and the name of my noble friend Lord Altrincham. I will also speak to the other amendments in the group.

I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Holmes for his amendments,...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc470-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what a pleasure it is to follow my noble friend Lady Neville-Rolfe. I agree with everything she said, with all the principles she set out and with the amendments in this group.

I shall speak to Amendment 106 and the other amendments in my name. We are asking a...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c471GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my interest as an employee of Marsh, an FCA-regulated entity. These amendments in the names of my noble friends Lady Neville-Rolfe, Lord Altrincham and Lord Holmes concern Clause 21, which I very much welcome in principle. The improvements to regulators’ approval timelines are a positive step,...

Member
Lord Ashcombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc471-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should like to speak briefly and, in so doing, declare my interest as an adviser to and shareholder in Banco Santander. I very much support these amendments. I think that we would all agree that we want our regulations and the entire process to be simple and...

Member
Lord Bridges of Headley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c473GC
House
House of Lords