Skip to main content

1-20 of 35 results for subject:"DBS Bridge Bank"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Sassoon on 18 November (WA 226–7), what are the total and particular costs expended to date in relation to the rescue of the Dunfermline Building Society (DBS) and the DBS bridge bank; what amount of those monies has...

Asked by
Lord Laird (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
4460; 722 c453WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government who were the professional advisers for the Bridge Bank that took over part of the Dunfermline Building Society in March 2009; what were their charges; what those charges consisted of; and whether they have been fully paid.

Asked by
Lord Laird (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 2010
Reference
2715; 721 c313-4WA
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
HC 417 2010-11
House
House of Commons

Today the Treasury has laid in both Houses of Parliament copies of the accounts for the Dunfermline Resolution Account for the year ending 31 March 2010. The accounts have been prepared in relation to the operation of the Dunfermline Resolution Account established in accordance with article 6(1) of, and schedule...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Department
Treasury
Type
Written statements
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c27WS
House
House of Commons

My honourable friend the Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Mark Hoban) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement. Today the Treasury has laid in both Houses of Parliament copies of the accounts for the Dunfermline resolution account for the year ending 31 March 2010. The accounts have been prepared...

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Department
Treasury
Type
Written statements
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
720 c85-6WS
House
House of Lords

DBS Bridge Bank Limited Supplemental and Onward Property Transfer Instrument 2009. (No parliamentary procedure).

Type
Unprinted papers
Date
13 July 2009
House
House of Commons

My Lords, we spent a long time during the passage of the Banking Bill discussing Section 75. It was argued by a number of noble Lords on the Conservative Benches that we should not have it at all and that the Government should just do things and then be sued...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c628
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have participated in this debate for their useful and at times challenging contributions. The noble Lord, Lord Goodlad, asked a broad but important question: do we in Government believe that the use of Section 75 powers here was in accordance with the...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c628-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on a point of clarification, I did not quite understand why those members of the pension scheme might have a preference ahead of others. Can the Minister briefly develop that point for me?

Member
Lord Kirkhill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c629
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the answer relates to the nature of the deposit account holders of a building society, the shareholders also effectively being unsecured depositors and subordinate to the preferred creditors and the pension fund in respect of having a deficit, counting as a preferred or senior creditor in that respect.

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c629
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is this the only case to date—including Northern Rock, Bradford & Bingley and, now, the Dunfermline—where a pension fund liability is effectively being left to go into the Pension Protection Fund if there is not enough money? I understand that this is the only one that has been...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c629
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am endeavouring to suggest to your Lordships—and I will correct this if I am myself misdirected—that there is considerable security in the situation of the defined benefit pension scheme of the Dunfermline in terms of its members’ access to additional funding in respect of any deficit. Put...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c629-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I asked about the property transfer instrument.

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c630
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall write to the noble Baroness on that. Motion agreed.

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c630
House
House of Lords

SI 2009/814. Lords debate on a motion to approve. Agreed to on question. [Relevant documents: 12th report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments and 14th report from the Merits Committee]

Lead member
Lord Myners
Answering member
Baroness Noakes
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c623-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do approve the third draft order standing in my name. In speaking to this order, I am mindful of the concerns raised by Members of this House regarding Section 75 during the passage of the Banking Bill, including the welcome contributions...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c623-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in his opening remarks, the Minister referred to the report of your Lordships’ Select Committee on the Constitution on what is now the Banking Act, particularly on its Section 75. At the time of the debates that were held then, nobody quite had in mind the circumstances that...

Member
Lord Goodlad (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c626
House
House of Lords

That the order laid before the House on 30 March be approved. Relevant Documents: 12th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments and 14th Report from the Merits Committee

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c623
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister will be pleased that I do not have quite as much to say on this order as on the previous two that we debated, but he will also be aware that I asked for this order to be debated separately from them, specifically because of it...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
710 c626-8
House
House of Lords

SI 2009/814; SI 2009/805; SI 2009/807. Considered by Delegated Legislation Committee.

Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Date
5 May 2009
Reference
1st DLC
House
House of Commons