Skip to main content

1-20 of 70 results for subject:"Dearing Review"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

This briefing considers the financial contribution made by students to higher education, including the recently announced increases to undergraduate fees in England.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
23 February 2026
Reference
CBP-10155

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment, what plans he has to implement recommendation 66 of the Dearing Report.

Asked by
Helen Jones (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education and Employment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 February 1998
Reference
26799; 305 c612W
House
House of Commons

Letter from Roger Dawe to Prof Brian Fender CMG on the governments plans for higher education funding for 1998-99. DFEE. 1997.

Deposited by
Department for Education and Employment
Type
Deposited papers
Date
10 December 1997
Reference
Dep/3 5653
House
House of Commons

Research in higher education: advice to the government on issues arising from the Dearing Report. OST/DTI. 1997.

Deposited by
Council for Science and Technology
Type
Deposited papers
Date
8 December 1997
Reference
Dep/3 5640
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion for the adjournment on education for 16 to 19 year olds.

Lead member
Eric Forth
Answering member
Lord Davies of Oldham
Department
Department for Education and Employment
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
17 May 1996
Reference
277 c1175-246
House
House of Commons

Whether following the review of education at 16 to 19, they have specific plans to ensure that the necessary new books and teaching materials are provided for students and libraries.

Asked by
Baroness David (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 May 1996
Reference
572 c23-4WA
House
House of Lords

Equipping young people for working life: a consultative document on improving employability through the 14-16 curriculum. DfEE. 1996.

Deposited by
Department for Education and Employment
Type
Consultation papers; Deposited papers
Date
2 May 1996
Reference
Dep/3 3281
House
House of Commons

Why, in commissioning Sir Ron Dearings report on education for 16 - 19 year olds, HMGovt failed to ask him to consider Continental practice of having separate institutions and distinct examinations for academic and vocational courses, and advise if this pattern might be applicable to England and Wales. - Includes...

Asked by
Lord Pilkington of Oxenford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 April 1996
Reference
571 c138-9WA
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Education and Employment Committee
Date
24 April 1996
Reference
HC 359-i 1995/96
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lang of Monkton (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 April 1996
Reference
275 c698
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lang of Monkton (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 April 1996
Reference
275 c698
House
House of Commons
To comment on engineering investment, exports and profitability. -
Asked by
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
17 April 1996
Reference
275 c698; 23919
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on Dearing review and quality of training for 16-19 year olds.
Asked by
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 April 1996
Reference
275 c698
House
House of Commons

Whether, in commissioning Sir Ron Dearing's report on education for 16 to 19 year-olds, HMG asked him to consider the Continental practice of there being separate institutions and examinations for academic and vocational courses for students over the age of 16. - Including terms of reference and fact that final...

Asked by
Lord Pilkington of Oxenford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 1996
Reference
571 c64WA
House
House of Lords

Statement on education and training for 16 to 19 year olds (includes announcement of Sir Ron Dearings report on the framework of qualifications).

Lead member
Baroness Shephard of Northwold
Department
Department for Education and Employment
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
27 March 1996
Reference
274 c1031-42
House
House of Commons

Business question on debate on Intergovernmental Conference, cold weather payments, report of ombudsman on Child Support Agency and Dearing report.

Member
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour)
Type
Business questions
Date
14 March 1996
Reference
273 c1117-8
House
House of Commons

What contribution he has made to the review by Sir Ron Dearing of qualifications for 16 to 19 year olds; and if he will place it in the Library.

Asked by
Tony Worthington (Labour)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 March 1996
Reference
20284; 273 c644-5W
House
House of Commons

What was the cost of the Dearing Review of the National Curriculum. - Including figures.

Asked by
Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 1995
Reference
257 c359W;257 c356-7W
House
House of Commons

If she has received Sir Ron Dearing's report on his investigation into awarding procedures in this year's mathematics and science GCSEs. - Inc statement on interim proposals to strengthen and clarify existing arrangements underpinning consistency of grading across GCSE examining groups.

Asked by
James Clappison (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 October 1994
Reference
248 c786-7W;248 c788-9W
House
House of Commons

If he will publish a table outlining the costs of implementing the National Curriculum; what are the costs so far of the current review procedure; and what is the forecast cost of the National Curriculum subjects to be implemented in September 1995. - Inc table and figs.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 1994
Reference
245 c751-2W;245 c745-6W
House
House of Commons